Rajat Thawani1, Lina Gao2, Ajay Mohinani2, Alina Tudorica2, Xin Li2, Zahi Mitri1, and Wei Huang2
1Division of Hematology and Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States, 2Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States
Synopsis
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is considered standard of
care for locally advanced breast cancer. Pre- and post-NAC MRI is routinely
used to assess response. This study aims
to investigate pre- and post-NAC quantitative DCE-MRI parameters, alone and in
combination with clinico-pathologic variables, for prediction of breast cancer recurrence
following NAC. 47 patients underwent DCE-MRI studies pre- and post-NAC. The
results show that quantitative pharmacokinetic DCE-MRI parameters, whether
alone or in combination with clinico-pathologic variables, outperformed tumor
size measurement by conventional imaging in prediction of recurrence. Furthermore, DCE-MRI parameters provided
added value in predictive performance when combined with clinico-pathologic
variables.
Introduction
Neoadjuvant
chemotherapy (NAC) is considered standard of care for locally advanced breast
cancer. 1 A recent
meta-analysis reported a 15-year local recurrence rate of 21.4% in patients who
received NAC. 2 Clinico-pathologic
factors associated with risk of recurrence include clinical N2 status, estrogen
receptor (ER) negative staining, and failure to achieve pathological complete
response to NAC. 3 Accurate identification of patients predicted
to recur post NAC may help select for appropriate treatment escalation and
de-escalation strategies to improve outcomes.
Pre- and post-NAC MRI is routinely used in clinical practice to assess response
to NAC. This study aims to investigate
pre- and post-NAC quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI parameters, alone
and in combination with clinico-pathologic variables, for prediction of
recurrence in patients treated with NAC. Methods
Breast cancer patients treated with standard of care NAC
were consented to the study. Clinico-pathologic variables [residual cancer
burden (RCB), tumor type, tumor grade, ER status, progesterone receptor (PR)
status, Her2 status, clinical nodal disease, stage, and age] were collected.
These patients underwent research DCE-MRI exams at visit 1 (V1) - before NAC,
V2 - after first NAC cycle, V3 – midpoint of NAC, and V4 - after NAC completion
but prior to surgery. Axial bilateral
and full-coverage breast DCE-MRI was performed using a 3T Siemens system with
14-20 s temporal resolution and ~ 10 min acquisition time. 4 Other acquisition parameters included 10o
flip angle, TE/TR = 2.7/6.2 ms, 30-36 cm FOV, 320x320 in-plane matrix size, and
1.4 mm slice thickness. Tumor regions of interest (ROIs) were manually drawn by
experienced radiologists on all post-contrast image slices covering the
contrast-enhanced tumor, and the tumor size in the longest diameter (LD) was
measured according to the RECIST guidelines. 5 Within the ROIs, the voxel DCE time-course
data were subjected to the Shutter-Speed model (SSM) pharmacokinetic analyses
to extract the Ktrans, ve, Kep (= Ktrans/ve),
and τi (mean intracellular water lifetime) parameters. 4 The τi parameter is unique to the
SSM which accounts for the cross cell membrane water exchange kinetics. 4,6 The whole tumor mean parameter value was
calculated by averaging the voxel parameter values. To align with routine clinical practice of
performing pre- and post-NAC MRI, only the MRI parameters obtained at V1 and V4
were used in this study for recurrence prediction. Pathologic response to NAC and RCB ranks were
determined from the post-NAC resection specimens. 7
Independent t-test was used to compare means of continuous
variables between recurrence and no-recurrence groups, and Fisher’s exact test
for the distribution of categorical variables. Univariate logistic regression C
statistics value, which is equivalent to the area under the ROC curve (ROC
AUC), was reported for prediction of recurrence using MRI parameters.
To mitigate potential bias caused by rare events and
accommodate quasi-complete separation in the data, Firth logistic regression
(FLR) was used to build multivariate prediction models for recurrence. Clinical
variables with a p-value < 0.2 from the univariate analysis (RCB, stage, and
age) were used to build the initial FLR model, followed by an automated
stepwise model selection procedure using AIC (Akaike information criterion) to
select a parsimonious main effect only model that accomplished a desired level
of prediction without over-fitting the current data. The final model included
RCB and age. Then, MRI parameters were added to this model one at a time to
examine the predictive performance presented as ROC AUC.Results
Among 47 participating patients, 7 patients experienced a
recurrence. Table 1 lists the mean and
SD values of the MRI parameters for the recurrence and no-recurrence groups, as
well as the ROC AUC values for prediction of recurrence. At V4 (post-NAC), the quantitative DCE-MRI
parameters of Ktrans, Kep, and τi outperformed LD
in prediction of recurrence. It is
interesting to note that, at V1 (pre-NAC), Ktrans showed good
predictive performance with an AUC > 0.7.
The final FLR model with the two clinical variables of RCB and age had
an ROC AUC of 0.900. Table 2 summarizes the
ROC AUC values when each MRI parameter was added to this model. While the addition of LD did not improve
predictive performances, several quantitative DCE parameters at both V1 and V4
provided added value on top of the clinical variables for prediction of
recurrence. As an example, Figure 1
shows the ROC curves for clinical variables only and additions of LD and Ktrans
at V4, respectively. Discussion and Conclusion
Our
study shows that quantitative DCE-MRI parameters, whether alone or in
combination with clinico-pathologic variables, outperformed tumor size measurement
by conventional imaging in prediction of breast cancer recurrence following
NAC. Quantitative DCE parameters
provided added value in predictive performance when combined with clinico-pathologic
variables. Patients with recurrence
tended to have higher perfusion/permeability as measured by Ktrans
and Kep, and higher metabolic activity as measured by τi6 both pre- and post-NAC. Improved predictive accuracy for recurrence
using clinical data and DCE-MRI parameters may allow clinicians to adjust
therapy regimens to augment response to NAC and reduce recurrence risk. This
study is limited by the small sample size and the moderate imbalance of the
small recurrence group. Acknowledgements
NIH
grant R01 CA248192References
1. Caudle AS, Yu T-K,
Tucker SL, Bedrosian I, Litton JK, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, et al. Local-regional
control according to surrogate markers of breast cancer subtypes and response
to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving
therapy. Breast Cancer Res. 2012 May 23;14(3):R83.
2. Asselain
B, Barlow W, Bartlett J, Bergh J, Bergsten-Nordström E, Bliss J, et al.
Long-term outcomes for neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast
cancer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials.
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;19(1):27–39.
3. Chou
H-H, Chung W-S, Ding R-Y, Kuo W-L, Yu C-C, Tsai H-P, et al. Factors affecting
locoregional recurrence in breast cancer patients undergoing surgery following
neoadjuvant treatment. BMC Surg. 2021 Mar 23;21(1):160.
4. Tudorica
A, Oh KY, Chui SY-C, Roy N, Troxell ML, Naik A, et al. Early Prediction and
Evaluation of Breast Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using
Quantitative DCE-MRI. Transl Oncol. 2016 Feb;9(1):8–17.
5. Eisenhauer
EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response
evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).
Eur J Cancer Oxf Engl 1990. 2009 Jan;45(2):228–47.
6. Springer
CS, Li X, Tudorica LA, Oh KY, Roy N, Chui SY-C, et al. Intratumor mapping of
intracellular water lifetime: metabolic images of breast cancer? NMR Biomed.
2014 Jul;27(7):760–73.
7. Symmans
WF, Peintinger F, Hatzis C, Rajan R, Kuerer H, Valero V, et al. Measurement of
residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant
chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2007 Oct 1;25(28):4414–22.