Zixuan Lin1, Chantelle Lim2, Dengrong Jiang1, Anja Soldan3, Corinne Pettigrew3, Kumiko Oishi1, Peiying Liu1,4, Marilyn Albert3, and Hanzhang Lu1
1Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States, 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States, 3Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States, 4Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
Synopsis
Oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) has
been suggested to be differentially affected by Alzheimer’s and vascular
pathology in older adults. We aimed to investigate age-related OEF change with
a longitudinal study design. 138 elderly participants were recruited with a
2-year follow-up. Individuals with higher vascular risks showed significant
elevation in OEF but not those with lower vascular risks. Higher OEF was also
associated with a faster growth in white matter hyperintensities, but not with
any Alzheimer’s pathology or APOE gene. The results suggested a prominent
effect of vascular pathology on OEF in aging.
INTRODUCTION
Cerebral oxygen extraction fraction
(OEF) is a physiological biomarker that reflects the balance between the
brain’s energy consumption and blood supply1. Alzheimer’s
disease (AD) and vascular cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID) are two of the
most common types of contributors to cognitive impairment2. Previous
cross-sectional studies have suggested that OEF is differentially affected by AD
and VCID. Decreased OEF has been reported in AD-related impairment, which was
attributed to reduced energy consumption associated with neurodegeneration in
the presence of normal blood supply3. On the other hand, elevated OEF was
reported in participants with higher vascular risks4, presumably
because of a pronounced reduction in blood supply in these patients.
However, longitudinal changes in OEF
in older adults have not been investigated. Thus, in this study, we measured
OEF in a cohort of 138 elderly participants with a two-year follow-up using T2-relaxation-under-spin-tagging
(TRUST) MRI. We also investigated the dependence of the longitudinal OEF change
on AD and vascular pathology.METHODS
Participants
A
total of 138 participants (69.6±7.1yrs, 85 F), including 120 cognitively normal individuals
and 18 Mild-Cognitive-Impairment (MCI) patients, were recruited from the
cohort of a longitudinal, HIPAA-compliant, IRB-approved study, titled
Biomarkers for Older Controls at Risk for Dementia (BIOCARD)5. Data from two
visits were used (wave 1 and wave 2), with a follow-up interval of 2.16±0.30
years.
MRI experiment and image processing
All MRI experiments were acquired on
a 3T Philips system. Global venous oxygenation (Yv) was measured
with TRUST MRI noninvasively at the superior sagittal sinus to calculate OEF as
$$$OEF=(Y_a-Y_v)/Y_a$$$ (Figure 1)6, where Ya
is arterial oxygenation (assumed to be 98%). TRUST MRI is based on the
principle that T2 relaxation time of the blood has a well-known and
calibratable relationship with Yv. The imaging parameters follows a
recent study7 and the scan
duration was 1min12s. A Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) MRI scan
was acquired to assess white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume quantitatively
using a Bayesian based method8.
Vascular
risks, CSF biomarkers and genotype
Vascular risk composite
scores (VRS) were obtained for both time points by evaluating five vascular
risks: hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, current smoking and obesity9. CSF specimens
were obtained through lumbar puncture from 99 participants (68.9±7.1yrs, 63F) and
AD biomarkers were measured with Lumipulse fully automated assay at both time
points, including total tau (t-tau), phosphorylated tau (p-tau), β-amyloid-42
(Aβ42) and β-amyloid-40 (Aβ40). APOE genotyping was also performed following
standard procedures.
Statistical analysis
Longitudinal change in OEF between
the two waves was assessed by paired t-test. The effect of age and sex on the
change in OEF was examined using linear regression. Participants were divided
into low and high VRS groups (by median split) and the OEF changes were
compared between two groups. Regression analyses were also performed to investigate
the relationship between OEF and longitudinal changes in WMH, AD pathology and APOE-ε4 status. In all analyses, a two-tailed p
value of 0.05 or less was considered statistically significant.RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Among 120 cognitively normal participants,
5 progressed to MCI over the follow-up period, resulting in a total of 23 MCI
at wave 2. Cross-sectional analysis revealed a modest positive association
between age and OEF that was significant at wave 1 (β=0.14±0.061% per year,
p=0.023), but not wave 2 (β=0.096±0.071% per year, p=0.18). Longitudinally, wave
2 OEF was significantly higher than that of wave 1 (∆OEF =1.14±0.50%, p=0.025,
Table 1). The change in OEF was not significantly associated with baseline age
(β=-0.049±0.072%
per year; p=0.50) or sex (β=0.21±1.05%; p=0.84).
Out of the entire cohort, 111
participants had a low VRS (values of 0, 1, or 2) and 27 had a high VRS (values
of 3, 4, or 5)
(Table 2). The high VRS group demonstrated a significant increase in OEF from
wave 1 to wave 2 (∆OEF=3.40±1.02%, p=0.0025). In contrast, the low VRS group
revealed a much slower OEF change (∆OEF=0.59±0.56%, p=0.30). ∆OEF in the
high VRS group was significantly higher than that in the low VRS group
(p=0.025).
In addition, we found a positive
association between longitudinal changes in logWMH and wave 2 OEF (β=0.0087±0.0032;
p=0.0075) with age as a covariate, suggesting that there is an association
between OEF (a functional marker) and white matter structural integrity. No
significant association was found between changes in logWMH and wave 1 OEF or
change of OEF.
There were no significant
associations between OEF and the change of p-tau or t-tau or Aβ42/Aβ40 from
wave 1 to wave 2. We did not observe an association between APOE4 and change of
OEF either.
Similar analyses were performed among
the cognitively normal participants only and yielded similar results.CONCLUSION
In conclusion, this study showed that
OEF increases longitudinally in older adults and this increase is primarily
related to vascular risks and white matter integrity, instead of AD pathology. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Buxton
RB, Uludag K, Dubowitz DJ, Liu TT. Modeling the hemodynamic response to brain
activation. Neuroimage 2004;23 Suppl 1:S220-233.
2. Stevens T, Livingston G, Kitchen G,
Manela M, Walker Z, Katona C. Islington study of dementia subtypes in the
community. Br J Psychiatry 2002;180:270-276.
3. Thomas BP, Sheng M, Tseng BY, Tarumi
T, Martin-Cook K, Womack KB, Cullum MC, Levine BD, Zhang R, Lu H. Reduced
global brain metabolism but maintained vascular function in amnestic mild
cognitive impairment. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2017;37:1508-1516.
4. Jiang D, Lin Z, Liu P et al. Brain
Oxygen Extraction Is Differentially Altered by Alzheimer's and Vascular
Diseases. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2020;52:1829-1837.
5. Marilyn A, Anja S, Rebecca G et al.
Cognitive Changes Preceding Clinical Symptom Onset of Mild Cognitive Impairment
and Relationship to ApoE Genotype. Current Alzheimer Research 2014;11:773-784.
6. Lu H, Ge Y. Quantitative evaluation
of oxygenation in venous vessels using T2-Relaxation-Under-Spin-Tagging MRI.
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2008;60:357-363.
7. Lin Z, Sur S, Soldan A et al. Brain
Oxygen Extraction by Using MRI in Older Individuals: Relationship to
Apolipoprotein E Genotype and Amyloid Burden. Radiology 2019;292:140-148.
8. DeCarli C, Fletcher E, Ramey V,
Harvey D, Jagust WJ. Anatomical Mapping of White Matter Hyperintensities (WMH).
Stroke 2005;36:50-55.
9. Gottesman RF, Schneider ALC, Zhou Y
et al. Association Between Midlife Vascular Risk Factors and Estimated Brain
Amyloid Deposition. JAMA 2017;317:1443-1450.