Burcu Zeydan1,2,3, Nur Neyal1, Jiye Son2, Holly A. Morrison3, Elizabeth J. Atkinson4, John D. Port2,3, Kejal Kantarci2, and Orhun H. Kantarci1,3
1Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States, 2Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States, 3Center for Multiple Sclerosis and Autoimmune Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States, 4Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
Synopsis
Cervical spinal cord atrophy is an important MRI measure
that correlates with progressive MS. We have previously shown that the
cranio-caudal loss of cervical cord area correlates with the evolution in MS
disease continuum. In this prospective study, in addition to age, we showed
that thalamic volumes may correlate with cervical cord area measurements,
possibly through a Wallerian degeneration mechanism, while total brain lesion
volumes do not. Our findings suggest that spinal cord area measurements in MS
is potentially an independent metric from lesion load measurements but can be
complemented by thalamic volume measurements as imaging outcomes in clinical
trials.
Introduction
Progressive MS (PMS) is the main
determinant of disability worsening in MS. Caudal cervical spinal
cord atrophy is an important predictor of evolution to PMS, because it is
already present at the time of or right before the onset of clinically
confirmed progressive PMS.1 Moreover, caudal cervical spinal
cord atrophy, is used as a supportive imaging criterion in progressive MS
diagnosis.1-3
In clinical trials, where standardized MRIs are obtained,
semi-automated methods are often used to measure cervical spinal cord volume.
However, to generate these methods, manual approach remains as the gold
standard, which seems to be a better option for heterogeneously-sourced
clinical MRIs. In a previous retrospective study, we used a manual approach to
measure each segmental area from C2 to C7 level and averaged these areas to
calculate cervical spinal cord average segmental area (CASA) from
heterogeneously-sourced clinical MRIs and showed that CASA is an early
biomarker of progression.1 In another complementary
retrospective study, we utilized previously established manual1 and semi-automated4 methods to identify C5 level as the practical
single-level spinal cord area, which both represented CASA sufficiently and reflected
the cranio-caudal pattern of spinal cord atrophy.5
In addition to independent effects of sex and age at
MRI; common MRI metrics used in clinical trials such as brain structure volumes
and brain lesion volumes may impact CASA. To date, there have been inconsistent
results on the association of spinal cord volume with brain atrophy and brain
lesion volume.6,7
In the current study, conducted in an independent
prospective cohort, our objective was to; 1) assess if CASA is impacted by aging
as well as brain structure volumes and total brain lesion volume; 2) evaluate
and confirm the identification of a practical single caudal level of cervical
spinal cord area that reflects CASA. Methods
One hundred fifty-nine brain and 159 cervical spinal
cord MRIs (attained within 0-10 days), using a standardized clinical MS imaging
protocol from 106 consecutive patients with MS (age mean±SD=46.1±12.5 years, 75
women, 31 men) from a single center were included prospectively during routine
clinical visits.
For spinal cord area analysis, a previously published
and established manual method was used1 (Figure-1) and cervical
spinal cord areas at each level from C2 to C7 were measured twice and averaged
to calculate CASA. An automated method called LesionQuant (LQ) was used to
analyze brain structure and lesion volumes (Figure-2). LQ is a software,
which segments and measures brain structure volumes automatically and compares
them with established normative values.8,9 It is a software developed for the
assessment of brain atrophy and lesions in patients with MS to be used
uniformly across centers as a clinically available tool as opposed to
center-specific research protocols.8Results
All cervical spinal cord segmental areas correlated
with CASA, but the most significant correlations were between CASA and C4
(R=0.95, p<0.001), C5 (R=0.93, p<0.001) and C6 (R=0.93, p<0.001)
levels (Figure-3). All cervical spinal cord segmental areas and CASA
also correlated with age, and the most significant correlations existed between
age and C4 (R=-0.34, p<0.001), C5 (R=-0.39, p<0.001) and C6 (R=-0.34,
p<0.001) levels (Figure-4).
CASA correlated with total brain volume both
unadjusted (R=0.38, p<0.001) and adjusted for age and sex (R=0.29,
p<0.001). CASA also correlated with thalamic volume both unadjusted (R=0.38,
p<0.001) and adjusted for age and sex (R=0.30, p<0.001). While total
brain and thalamic volumes correlated with CASA, there was no association found
between total brain lesion volume and CASA (unadjusted, R=-0.13, p=0.117;
adjusted for age and sex, R=-0.01, p=0.871). Total brain lesion volume did not
correlate with total brain volume either (unadjusted, R=-0.13, p=0.122;
adjusted for age and sex, R=-0.02, p=0.767), but a significant association was
found between total brain lesion volume and thalamic volume (unadjusted, R=-0.26,
p=0.002; adjusted for age and sex, R=-0.21, p=0.012). Discussion
In this prospective study C4,
C5 and C6 level segmental areas strongly correlated with CASA. In line with our
previous findings, in an independent clinical cohort, C5 level stood out as it
is the overlapping area between middle (C3-C4-C5) and lower (C5-C6-C7) segments
of the cervical spinal cord, reflecting the cranio-caudal pattern of atrophy.
As a subclinical progression
biomarker, cervical spinal cord atrophy is a clinically relevant MRI measure in
MS. Identifying potential factors that could be associated with cervical
spinal cord atrophy is important. Cervical spinal cord atrophy becomes more
evident with aging and it may be associated with total brain volume and
thalamic volume. However, total brain lesion volume does not seem to strongly
impact cervical spinal cord area measures suggesting the independence of
cervical spinal cord area measurements as a subclinical progressive MS
biomarker. Conclusion
When evaluating cervical spinal cord atrophy
measures; age, total brain volume and thalamic volume may need to be corrected
for, while brain lesion burden appears to be an independent metric. From a
practicality and ease of application standpoint in the clinic, single level area
measurements such as C5 level may be used as it reflects average cervical
spinal cord area in a cranio-caudal atrophy pattern in patients with MS. Acknowledgements
NIH (NIA:U54 AG44170) and Mayo Clinic CMSAN References
1. Zeydan
B, Gu X, Atkinson EJ, et al. Cervical spinal cord atrophy: An early marker of
progressive MS onset. Neurol Neuroimmunol
Neuroinflamm. 2018;5(2):e435.
2. Rocca
MA, Valsasina P, Meani A, et al. Clinically relevant cranio-caudal patterns of
cervical cord atrophy evolution in MS. Neurology.
2019.
3. Filippi
M, Preziosa P, Barkhof F, et al. Diagnosis of Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
From the Imaging Perspective: A Review. JAMA
Neurol. 2021;78(3):351-364.
4. Liu
W, Nair G, Vuolo L, et al. In vivo imaging of spinal cord atrophy in
neuroinflammatory diseases. Ann Neurol. 2014;76(3):370-378.
5. Zeydan
B, Ucem S, Dubuche T, et al. C5 level area can replace whole cervical spinal
cord area measurements in multiple sclerosis as a practical biomarker of
progression. ISMRM 2020.
6. Biberacher
V, Boucard CC, Schmidt P, et al. Atrophy and structural variability of the
upper cervical cord in early multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2015;21(7):875-884.
7. Bot
JC, Barkhof F. Spinal-cord MRI in multiple sclerosis: conventional and
nonconventional MR techniques. Neuroimaging
Clin N Am. 2009;19(1):81-99.
8. Brune
S, Hogestol EA, Cengija V, et al. LesionQuant for Assessment of MRI in Multiple
Sclerosis-A Promising Supplement to the Visual Scan Inspection. Front Neurol. 2020;11:546744.
9. Brewer JB. Fully-automated volumetric
MRI with normative ranges: translation to clinical practice. Behav Neurol. 2009;21(1):21-28.