3811

Brain T1ρ quantification at the first 5T whole-body MR system: a pilot study
Yuanyuan Liu1,2, Lanlan Gao3, Shuheng Zhang3, Zhuoxu Cui4, Qingyong Zhu4, Haifeng Wang1, Dong Liang1, and Yanjie Zhu1
1Paul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging,Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China, 2National Innovation Center for Advanced Medical Devices, Shenzhen, China, 3United Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai, China, 4Research Center for Medical AI,Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China

Synopsis

MR quantitative T mapping has gained increasing attention due to its capability in studying low-frequency motional processes and chemical exchange in biological tissues. At ultra-high fields, the chemical exchange and proton diffusion in biological tissues should be more prominent. In this study, for the first time, we aim to test the feasibility of T mapping of brain at 5T and evaluate the T values estimated from datasets using both 3T and 5T scanners.

INTRODUCTION

T quantification has been successfully applied in detecting low-frequency motional processes and chemical exchange in biological tissues [1]. Recent studies have shown that the ultra-high magnetic field is helpful to detect the exchange from certain molecules such as glutamine and glucose [2, 3]. However, T quantification of humans at ultra-high magnetic fields has been rarely reported. This year, the first 5T whole-body MR system (uMR Jupiter, United Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai, China) was delivered. We implemented the T mapping sequence at this system, using a spin-lock preparation pulse followed by a gradient recalled echo (GRE) readout. The sequence was applied to the human brain. In this study, we report the T quantification of the human brain at 5T for the first time and compare the results with 3T.

METHODS

An adiabatically prepared constant-amplitude on-resonant spin-lock approach was used for T preparation to compensate for the B0 and B1 inhomogeneities [4] and was embedded to a 3D GRE sequence on both 3T and 5T MR scanners (uMR 890/3T, uMR Jupiter/5T, United Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai, China). Table 1 illustrates the imaging parameters for both 3T and 5T experiments. Five healthy volunteers (age 30±5) were recruited (IRB proved). The T measurements were estimated using the monoexponential model [5, 6]: $$M=M_0exp{(-TSL_n/T_{1\rho})_{n=1,2,...,N}} $$
where M is the image intensity obtained at varying spin lock times (TSLs), M0 is the baseline image intensity without the application of the spin-lock pulse. N is the total number of TSLs.The T values in three manually drawn ROIs for each volunteer were calculated at 5T and compared with that calculated at 3T using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Statistical significance was set as P < 0.05.

RESULTS and DISCUSSION

Figure 1 shows the T-weighted images at different TSLs from one volunteer collected at 3T and 5T scanners, respectively. The corresponding Tmaps are shown in Figure 2. Visible noise can be seen in T-weighted images at 3T, especially for the images with a relatively high TSL (e.g., TSL = 65ms). Hereby, the corresponding T maps of 3T are also noisier compared with the maps at 5T. This observation is consistent with the expectation that images acquired at 5T have higher SNR than 3T. Table 2 shows the mean T values of gray matter and white matter in selected ROIs at 3T and 5T. For the data presented in the current study, no significant difference is observed between T values at 3T and 5T for all the selected ROIs (all P > 0.05). T values are in the same range as previous literature, in which the obtained T values are in the order of 40 ms ~ 100 ms for gray matter and white matter at 7T and 9.4T [4, 7].

CONCLUSION

The SNRs of T-weighted images and T maps were improved at 5T, which benefits the analysis and dispersion-related studies. The T values at 5T show no significant difference with those obtained at 3T.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant nos. 61771463,81971611, National Key R&D Program of China nos. 2020YFA0712202, 2017YFC0108802.

References

1. Wang YX, Zhang Q, Li X, Chen W, Ahuja A, Yuan J. T magnetic resonance: basic physics principles and applications in knee and intervertebral disc imaging. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2015;5(6):858-885.

2. Jin T, Iordanova B, Hitchens TK, Modo M, Wang P, Mehrens H, Kim SG. Chemical exchange-sensitive spin-lock (CESL) MRI of glucose and analogs in brain tumors. Magn Reson Med 2018;80(2):488-495.

3. Paech D, Schuenke P, Koehler C, Windschuh J, Mundiyanapurath S, Bickelhaupt S, Bonekamp D, Baumer P, Bachert P, Ladd ME, Bendszus M, Wick W, Unterberg A, Schlemmer HP, Zaiss M, Radbruch A. T-weighted Dynamic Glucose-enhanced MR Imaging in the Human Brain. Radiology 2017;285(3):914-922.

4. Herz K, Gandhi C, Schuppert M, Deshmane A, Scheffler K, Zaiss M. CEST imaging at 9.4 T using adjusted adiabatic spin-lock pulses for on- and off-resonant T-dominated Z-spectrum acquisition. Magn Reson Med 2019;81(1):275-290.

5. Zhu Y, Liu Y, Ying L, Peng X, Wang YJ, Yuan J, Liu X, Liang D. SCOPE: signal compensation for low-rank plus sparse matrix decomposition for fast parameter mapping. Phys Med Biol 2018;63(18):185009.

6. Zhu Y, Liu Y, Ying L, Qiu Z, Liu Q, Jia S, Wang H, Peng X, Liu X, Zheng H, Liang D. A 4-minute solution for submillimeter whole-brain T quantification. Magn Reson Med 2021;85(6):3299-3307.

7. Schuenke P, Koehler C, Korzowski A, Windschuh J, Bachert P, Ladd ME, Mundiyanapurath S, Paech D, Bickelhaupt S, Bonekamp D, Schlemmer HP, Radbruch A, Zaiss M. Adiabatically prepared spin-lock approach for T-based dynamic glucose enhanced MRI at ultrahigh fields. Magn Reson Med 2017;78(1):215-225.

Figures

Table 1. Imaging parameters for T mapping of the human brain with different field conditions at 3T and 5T.

Figure 1. T-weighted images for datasets of one volunteer collected at 3T and 5T with different TSLs (TSL= 0 ms, 65 ms) .

Figure 2. The corresponding Tmaps estimated from datasets collected at 3T and 5T for the same volunteer in figure 1.

Table 2. Average T values of selected ROIs and the corresponding P-value at 3T and 5T.

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 30 (2022)
3811
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58530/2022/3811