Zhengshi Yang1,2, Jessica Z.K. Caldwell1, Jeffrey L Cummings2, Aaron Ritter1, Jefferson W Kinney2, and Dietmar Cordes1,2,3
1Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas, NV, United States, 2University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, United States, 3University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, United States
Synopsis
Resting-state fMRI was used to investigate the
aging effect on caudate function in mild cognitively impaired participants,
with the focus of sex-dependent effect. Graph theory analysis was conducted to
derive caudate nodal strength, which was then input to linear mixed effect
model to evaluate its association with age. A striking aging effect was
observed only in women with MCI but not in men with MCI, which was closely
related to cognitive decline in woman participants. This finding suggests that caudate
may be critical for alleviating cognitive decline in women with MCI.
INTRODUCTION
Brain aging is characterized by considerable
heterogeneity, including the differences between regions and the variability
induced by demographic factors and symptomatic or presymptomatic pathology. Mild
cognitive impairment (MCI) is known to be a heterogeneous condition [1]. While episodic memories are established and
maintained by an interplay between the medial temporal lobe and other cortical
regions, the aging-related degradation of the frontostriatal system is
suggested to be a driving factor of episodic memory decline in older adults [2]. Furthermore,
emerging evidence suggests that women differ from men in multiple neurological
aspects, including brain function, cognitive domains, cognitive decline [3, 4]. In this study, we focused on investigating
aging effect on caudate, one important region in frontostriatal system, among mild
cognitive impairment (MCI) participants using resting-state functional magnetic
resonance (fMRI) data and evaluating the role of sex in the process.METHODS
277 functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)
sessions from 163 cognitive normal (CN) older adults and 309 sessions from 139
participants with MCI were included as the main sample in our analysis.
Pearson’s correlation was used to characterize the functional connectivity (FC)
between caudate and each brain region in the AAL atlas (94 regions of
interests). Weighted FC networks were used in the graph theoretical analysis to
derive the caudate nodal strength, which characterizes the overall connectivity
strength of all regions with caudate. Association analysis between caudate
nodal strength and age was carried out in MCI and CN separately using linear
mixed effect (LME) model with both women and men included (education,
handedness, sex, Apolipoprotein E4 and intra-subject effect as covariates). LME
model was then applied to women and men separately within MCI group to evaluate
aging effects on caudate nodal strength. Similar association analysis was
conducted between age and individual region’s connectivity with caudate to
unveil which region’s connectivity with caudate substantially contributes to
aging effect on caudate nodal strength. With the fMRI subset having amyloid positron
emission tomography (PET) scans available in the same visits, the role of
amyloid burden in the association of age with caudate nodal strength was
examined using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Furthermore, the pair-wise correlation
analysis of cognitive scores with age and caudate nodal strength was conducted.
The same statistical analysis with an independent fMRI dataset acquired with
fast fMRI acquisition protocol was used to further validate the sex-dependent
aging effects observed in the main sample.RESULTS
With both women and men included in the
analysis, the MCI group had significantly stronger age-related increase of
caudate nodal strength (Left: p =
0.0017; right: p = 6.2x10-5, see
Figure 1) than the CN group (Left: p
= 0.16; right: p = 0.02, see Figure
1). Analyzing women and men separately revealed that the aging effect on
caudate nodal strength among MCI participants was significant only for women (Figure
2, left: P=6.23x10-7, right: P=3.37x10-8), but not for men (Figure 2, P>0.3
for bilateral caudate). Similar sex-dependent aging effects on caudate nodal
strength were observed with the independent sample. ANCOVA showed that the
aging effects on caudate nodal strength were not significantly mediated by
brain amyloid burden. Sex-dependent aging effects on caudate nodal strength
were consistently observed in both amyloid positive and amyloid negative MCI participants
(Figure 3). Caudate connectivity with ventral prefrontal cortex substantially
contributed to the aging effect on caudate nodal strength in women with MCI
(Figure 4). While older age was associated with worse cognition for both women
and men with MCI, higher caudate nodal strength was significantly associated
with worse cognition in women but not in men with MCI (Figure 5).DISCUSSION
While age-related change in the caudate is
recognized as an important factor to predict cognitive decline over the life
span [5], compared to
the medial temporal lobe system, far less attention has been paid to the
involvement of the caudate in dementia, and most of these prior MRI studies
focused on volumetric changes of caudate with diverse conclusions [6-8]. Our analysis revealed a striking aging
effects on caudate nodal strength in women with MCI but not in men with MCI. In
addition, we showed that caudate was closely related to cognitive decline in
women with MCI, suggesting that caudate may be sensitive to the pathology
experienced in the woman participants. A
previous fMRI study showed differing brain functional alteration between MCI
and CN in women and men, based on multiple global network metrics [9]. These
observations together suggest that the alteration of brain function in MCI is
sex-dependent. CONCLUSION
Sex modulates the pathological aging effects on
caudate in MCI regardless of amyloid status. Caudate nodal strength may be a
sensitive biomarker of pathological aging in women with MCI. Sex could be a
critical factor for developing personalized medication strategy to alleviate
cognitive decline in MCI. Acknowledgements
This research project
was supported by the NIH (Grant No. 1RF1AG071566, COBRE 5P20GM109025 and NeVADRC;
P20-AG068053), Cleveland Clinic Keep Memory Alive Young Investigator Award, The
Women's Alzheimer's Movement, a private grant from Stacie and Chuck Matthewson,
a private grant from Peter and Angela Dal Pezzo, and a private grant from Lynn
and William Weidner. Part of the data collection and sharing for this study was
funded by the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (National
Institutes of Health Grant U01 AG024904) and DOD ADNI (Department of Defense
award number W81XWH-12-2-0012). ADNI is funded by the National Institute on
Aging, the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, and
through generous contributions from the following: AbbVie, Alzheimer’s
Association; Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation; Araclon Biotech;
BioClinica, Inc.; Biogen; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; CereSpir, Inc.;
Cogstate; Eisai Inc.; Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Eli Lilly and Company;
EuroImmun; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and its affiliated company Genentech, Inc.;
Fujirebio; GE Healthcare; IXICO Ltd.; Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy Research
& Development, LLC.; Johnson &Johnson Pharmaceutical Research &
Development LLC.; Lumosity; Lundbeck; Merck & Co., Inc.; Meso Scale
Diagnostics, LLC.; NeuroRx Research; Neurotrack Technologies; Novartis
Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Pfizer Inc.; Piramal Imaging; Servier; Takeda
Pharmaceutical Company; and Transition Therapeutics. The Canadian Institutes of
Health Research is providing funds to support ADNI clinical sites in Canada.
Private sector contributions are facilitated by the Foundation for the National
Institutes of Health (www.fnih.org). The grantee organization is the Northern
California Institute for Research and Education, and the study is coordinated
by the Alzheimer’s Therapeutic Research Institute at the University of Southern
California. ADNI data are disseminated by the Laboratory for Neuro Imaging at
the University of Southern California.References
1. Lambon
Ralph, M.A., et al., Homogeneity and
heterogeneity in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: a cross‐sectional and longitudinal
study of 55 cases. Brain, 2003. 126(11):
p. 2350-2362.
2. Fjell, A.M., et al., Brain Events Underlying Episodic Memory
Changes in Aging: A Longitudinal Investigation of Structural and Functional
Connectivity. Cereb Cortex, 2016. 26(3):
p. 1272-1286.
3. Li, R. and M. Singh, Sex differences in cognitive impairment and
Alzheimer’s disease. Frontiers in neuroendocrinology, 2014. 35(3): p. 385-403.
4. Holland, D., et al., Higher rates of decline for women and
apolipoprotein E ε4 carriers. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 2013. 34(12): p. 2287-2293.
5. Greven, C.U., et al., Developmentally stable whole-brain volume
reductions and developmentally sensitive caudate and putamen volume alterations
in those with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and their unaffected
siblings. JAMA psychiatry, 2015. 72(5):
p. 490-499.
6. Ryan, N.S., et al., Magnetic resonance imaging evidence for
presymptomatic change in thalamus and caudate in familial Alzheimer’s disease.
Brain, 2013. 136(5): p. 1399-1414.
7. Barber, R., et al., Volumetric MRI study of the caudate nucleus
in patients with dementia with Lewy bodies, Alzheimer's disease, and vascular
dementia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 2002. 72(3): p. 406-407.
8. Persson, K., et al., Finding of increased caudate nucleus in
patients with Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 2018. 137(2): p. 224-232.
9. Cieri, F., et al., Sex Differences of Brain Functional Topography
Revealed in Normal Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease Cohort. Journal of
Alzheimer's Disease, 2021. 80: p.
979-984.