Jing Wang1, Zhuo Wang1, Yi Zhu2, and Ke Jiang2
1Radiology, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China, 2Philips Healthcare, Beijing, China
Synopsis
The quality of commonly used fetal T1-weighed inversion recovery(IR) images
is relatively poor. Compressed SENSE(CS) technique allows shortening of scan time,
but the overall image quality has not been significantly improved. In this
study, Compressed-SENSE Artificial intelligence(CS-AI) framework was applied to
reduce the scan time and increase the spatial resolution. This study aims at
acquiring high-resolution fetal brain T1-weighted image with reduced scan time
and compare the image quality among images reconstructed with CS-AI, CS and
conventional SENSE.
Introduction
Magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) is an invaluable diagnostic tool for
assessing brain development, and has
been widely used in fetal imaging for diagnosis and research. Meanwhile, the
T2-weighted single-shot-fast-spin-echo(ssFSE) sequence is the backbone of fetal
brain MRI and is characterized by both high contrast and high quality. The
T1-weighted sequence plays an important role in evaluating fetal intracranial
hemorrhage which is related to neonatal outcome1. However, the
quality of commonly used fetal T1-weighed inversion recovery(IR) images with
high resolution is relatively poor2. Compressed SENSE(CS) technique
allows shortening of scan time, but the overall image quality has not been
significantly improved. Recently, deep learning AI algorithms have been
combined with CS to improve the quality of the final reconstructed image3.
In this study, Compressed-SENSE Artificial intelligence(CS-AI) framework was
applied to reduce the scan time and increase the spatial resolution. This study
aims at acquiring high-resolution fetal brain T1-weighted image with reduced
scan time and compare the image quality among images reconstructed with CS-AI,
CS and conventional SENSE.Materials and Methods
The study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board(IRB),and
written consent was obtained from all subjects. Six pregnant women(median
gestational age,30 weeks, gestational age range, 243/7-37 weeks) were
examined on a 3.0T system(Elition, Philips Healthcare) with body coil. The
inspection purposes were ventriculomegaly(2/6), blurry cavum septum pellucidum(2/6)
, small head circumference(1/6), and megacisternmagna(1/6). The T1-weighted
images were obtained by IR turbo-field-echo(TFE) and utilizing CS-SENSE or
CS-AI technology to reconstruction. According to the institutional standard
T1-weighted TSE sequence, SENSE technology with the acceleration of 2 was also
obtained as a reference. Following parameters were applied to all examinations:
FOV=375X306,Voxel=1.6X1.6, slice thickness(mm)/gap=4.0/0,
matrix=236X193, TR(ms)=12,
TE(ms)=2.3, CS acceleration factor=3, NSA=1, scan time=1’41’’(SENSE) or
1’10’’(CS and CS-AI). Reconstruction parameter denoising level was set to system
default for all cases. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)(SNR=mean signal
intensity(SI)/standard deviation(SD)of SI) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)
($$CNR_{tissure1-tissrue2}=\frac{|SI_{ROI1}-SI_{ROI2}|}{\sqrt{SD_{ROI1}^{2}+SD_{ROI2}^{2}}}$$ )(CNR1, between cortical and cerebrospinal
fluid(CSF), CNR2 between cortical and white matter ) of T1-SENSE were compared
with those of CS and CS-AI. Image quality of three sequences was analyzed by
two readers independently, who were blinded to any clinical information (8 years
of experience in MR imaging and 13 years of experience in MR imaging). The
statistical analysis was performed with Graphpad 9.0. The Friedman test and
Dunn‘s post-hoc analysis was performed to test for an influence of the
different sequences. P values< 0.05 were considered significant.Results
Representative high resolution T1W images using the SENSE, C-SENSE and
CS-AI reconstructions are shown in Figure 1. As Figure 2 showed, compared to
SENSE, the CS-AI produced higher SNR of CSF, cortical and white matter, and
they showed significant difference (p<0.05). Compared to CS, the
CS-AI images showed higher SNR too, while the SNR of cortical and white matter
demonstrated significant difference (p<0.05), but the SNR of CSF did
not show statistical difference(p=0.0742).
Figure 3 demonstrates the CNR comparison of the SENSE, CS, and CS-AI for
T1WI images. The CS-AI produced higher CNR of cortical/CSF, and cortical/white
matter, compared to SENSE(p=0.0066 and 0.0429 respectively) and CS(p=0.0429
and 0.0066 respectively). The CS images quality is comparable to that of the
SENSE(p>0.9999).
Conclusions
Overall, in this study, we found that the CS-AI technology can reduces the
scan time for the high resolution T1-IR sequence in fetal brain MR imaging
about 31 seconds as well as the image quality is improved (measured by physical
parameters such as SNR and CNR). This technology may be particularly useful in
patients whom unable to remain stationary for a long time. T1-IR-CS-AI
outperforms conventional SENSE sequence and CS sequence in fetal brain MR
imaging which is a reliable alternative for clinical use in fetal brain MR
imaging.In the future study, more patients will be enrolled in this study, and
more comprehensive subjective assessments and objective measurements will be
performed in different denose level for CS-AI.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.Malamateniou C, McGuinness AK, Allsop JM,
O'Regan DP, Rutherford MA, Hajnal JV. Snapshot inversion recovery: an optimized
single-shot T1-weighted inversion-recovery sequence for improved fetal brain
anatomic delineation. Radiology. 2011 Jan;258(1):229-35. doi:
10.1148/radiol.10100381. Epub 2010 Oct 27. PMID: 20980451.
2.Sun T, Jiang L, Zhang Z, Zhang C, Zhang H,
Wang G, Qian Z. Feasibility of free-breathing T1-weighted 3D radial VIBE for
fetal MRI in various anomalies. Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Jun;69:57-64. doi:
10.1016/j.mri.2020.03.004. Epub 2020 Mar 20. PMID: 32171775.
3.Knoll F, Murrell T, Sriram A, Yakubova N,
Zbontar J, Rabbat M, Defazio A, Muckley MJ, Sodickson DK, Zitnick CL, Recht MP.
Advancing machine learning for MR image reconstruction with an open
competition: Overview of the 2019 fastMRI challenge. Magn Reson Med. 2020
Dec;84(6):3054-3070. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28338. Epub 2020 Jun 7. PMID: 32506658;
PMCID: PMC7719611.