Wenting Luo1, Yue Zhang2, Xiaoyan Hou2, Menghan Feng1, Chengwei Fu1, Weicui Chen2, Xian Liu2, Zhaoxian Yan2, Kan Deng3, Biyun Xu4, and Bo Liu2
1The Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China, 2Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China, 3Philips Healthcare, Guangzhou, China, 4Department of Sleep Disorder, Fangcun Branch, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
Synopsis
The individual response to treatment with
the transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation ( taVNS ) in primary
insomnia varies greatly, while there is lack of objective markers for patient’s
treatment outcome. In this work, we demonstrated that the baseline functional
connectivity combined with machine learning algorithms can predict response to
treatment with taVNS in primary insomnia. The functional connectivity values
within and between brain networks such as the default mode network, affective
network, visual network, and cerebellar network maybe potential objective
markers of patient’s treatment outcome.
Introduction
Transcutaneous auricular vagus
nerve stimulation (taVNS) is effective to treat primary insomnia (PI), but the
individual response to taVNS treatment varies greatly. Therefore, it is
necessary to screen patients suitable for taVNS before treatment, however,
there is a lack of reliable objective markers. In this study, we used the
baseline resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) as features combined with
machine learning algorithms to predict the individual response to treatment
with taVNS in patients with chronic primary insomnia (CPI).Methods
Firstly, resting-state
functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) was performed in recruited
patients with CPI (n=77). After 4 weeks of taVNS treatment, these
patients’ outcomes were labeled as effective or ineffective according to
whether the efficacy score of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was
greater than 25%. Secondly, the rsFC matrix was calculated based on the
automatic anatomical marker map as the features, and the features with
distinguishing ability were screened out through the F-score and 10 - fold
cross-validation methods. Then the Multi-Voxel Pattern Analysis (MVPA) method
based on the logistic
regression classifier was used to predict the efficacy classification of
these patients, and the contingency degree of accuracy was evaluated by
permutation test. Finally, the performance of the prediction model was
evaluated by using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC),
accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.Results
When the edges of the rsFC
matrix were 300, the accuracy of the prediction model was the highest, achieved
a correct classification rate of 80% (permutation test, 5000 times, P<0.0002)
[sensitivity 80%, specificity 80%, and the AUC 0.7875] for differentiating
effective subjects (n=20) from ineffective subjects (n=20). Brain areas that
contributed most to the classification model were mainly located within the
right posterior cingulate gyrus, right angular gyrus, bilateral anterior
cingulate gyrus, right amygdala, right orbitofrontal gyrus, right calcarine,
and cerebellum. Furthermore, the consensus connections to distinguish effective
or ineffective patients were largely located within or between the default mode
network (DMN), affective network (AN), visual network (VN), and cerebellar
network (CE).Discussion
Previous neuroimaging studies [1-5]
have shown that the abnormal functional activities in DMN, AN, VN, and CE
networks are related to insomnia. Furthermore, our results show that the FC
within and between the DMN, AN, VN, and CE networks can predict the efficacy
of taVNS treatment in insomnia, indicating that the functional activities of
these networks are related to the response to treatment with taVNS in the
patients with PI and may be objective markers of the efficacy.Conclusions
These findings suggest that the
baseline rsFC within and between these brain networks, such as DMN, AN, VN, and
CE, combined with machine-learning algorithms, can provide crucial insights
into pathophysiological mechanisms, objective treatment outcome markers, and
the individual effectiveness of the taVNS in CPI.Acknowledgements
The authors thank the volunteers and the investigators who took part in the study. References
1. Wu X, Zhang Y, Luo W, et al. Brain Functional
Mechanisms Determining the Efficacy of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve
Stimulation in Primary Insomnia. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2021 Mar; 15: 186.
2. Ma X, Fu S, Yin Y, et al. Aberrant Functional
Connectivity of Basal Forebrain Subregions with Cholinergic System in
Short-term and Chronic Insomnia Disorder. J Affect Disord. 2021; 278: 481-487.
3. Dai XJ, Liu BX, Ai S, et al. Altered
inter-hemispheric communication of default-mode and visual networks underlie
etiology of primary insomnia: Altered inter-hemispheric communication underlie
etiology of insomnia. Brain Imaging Behav. 2020 Oct;14(5):1430-1444.
4. Gong L, Yu S, Xu R, et al. The abnormal reward
network associated with insomnia severity and depression in chronic insomnia
disorder. Brain Imaging Behav. 2021 Apr;15(2):1033-1042.
5. Wu Y, Zhou Z, Fu S, et al. Abnormal Rich Club
Organization of Structural Network as a Neuroimaging Feature in Relation with
the Severity of Primary Insomnia. Front Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;11: 308.