Guruprasad Krishnamoorthy1, Matthew M Willmering2, Jason C Woods2,3, and James G Pipe4
1MR R&D, Philips Healthcare, Rochester, MN, United States, 2Center for Pulmonary Imaging Research, Divisions of Pulmonary Medicine and Radiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States, 3Departments of Pediatrics, Radiology, and Physics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States, 4Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
Synopsis
FLORET
(Fermat looped, orthogonally encoded trajectories) is an efficient center-out
3D spiral trajectory, and it supports ultra-short echo times. In this work, a new
trajectory ordering scheme and FLORET balanced steady-state free precession
(FLORET-bSSFP) were developed at 1.5T with inline reconstruction. Simulations,
phantom, and human lung imaging were performed to compare the performance of
the proposed trajectory ordering with standard ordering. The proposed
trajectory ordering scheme minimized artifacts caused by the changing gradient
moments while improving temporal stability and motion robustness. High-quality
free-breathing lung images were obtained using FLORET-bSFFP and spoiled
gradient echo-based UTE FLORET.
Introduction
FLORET
(Fermat looped, orthogonally encoded trajectories) is an efficient center-out
3D spiral trajectory1 and it supports ultra-short echo times2. It is based on a single Fermat spiral
waveform which is relatively easier to design when compared to a stack-of-cones3 trajectory requiring the design of multiple
waveforms. FLORET spoiled gradient echo-based UTE sequence (FLORET-SPGR) has
been shown to have applications in sodium imaging of the brain4 and knee2,5, morphological6, and functional7 imaging of the lungs. This work developed a
new trajectory ordering scheme and FLORET balanced steady-state free precession
(FLORET-bSSFP). Eddy current effects and motion robustness of the proposed
trajectory ordering and the conventional trajectory ordering1 was compared with both FLORET-bSSFP and FLORET-SPGR
sequences. The proposed method was fully implemented in the scanner platform
for inline reconstruction of images.Methods
In
the FLORET sequence as proposed by Pipe et al.1., a single Fermat spiral waveform is rotated on
the fly in a spherical coordinate system to cover 3D k-space based on the
following equations, $$α(h, n) = α0*[1 - (2*n) / (N-1)]$$ $$β(h, n) = π*(3-√5)*n$$ where, $$$h = 0, 1, ...H-1$$$ hubs, $$$n = 0,1,..N-1$$$ arms to satisfy Nyquist
criteria within each hub, α is the
polar angle, β is the
azimuthal angle, and α0 is the
polar coverage within a hub. The distribution of each spiral arm within a hub
follows sunflower head pattern8 due to the golden angle $$$(π*(3-√5)≈137.5°)$$$ used. K-space can be critically sampled with a single hub with α0of 90⁰ , two orthogonal hubs with α0 ≥ 45⁰, or three orthogonal hubs with α0 ≥ 36⁰ within each hub. The trajectory ordering, as mentioned above, will be called linear ordering henceforth.
The proposed trajectory ordering makes use of the inherent property of the
golden angle similar to9,10 and formulates an interleaved ordering as follows, $$α(i, h, f) = α0*[1 - (2*(i+f*i)) / (N-1)]$$ $$β(i,h,f) = π*(3-√5)*(i+f*i)$$ where, $$$i = 0, 1, 2,... I-1$$$ Fibonacci number of interleaves, $$$f={0,1,2...F-1,if iseven(i), F-1,F-2,…0,otherwise}$$$, f is FLORET arms per interleave. I and F and are chosen such
that $$$I*F≈N$$$. The data
acquisition is performed by first looping through f followed by h and then finally i. The proposed trajectory ordering will be
called Fibonacci ordering hereafter in this article.
The base Fermat spiral arm was
generated with a modified version of the numerical solution described in 11. Figure 1 shows the pulse sequence
diagrams and animations of different trajectory schemes used in this work. The
angular distance between the successive FLORET arms was calculated through simulations
assuming that the angular distance is proportional to the changing gradient
moments caused by the trajectory ordering scheme. These changing gradient
moments can cause long-term eddy currents and can lead to image artifacts.
The proposed method was
fully implemented with inline reconstruction on a 1.5T Ambition-X system
(Philips, Best, The Netherlands). Phantom images were acquired with FLORET-SPGR
and FLORET-bSSFP sequences. Free-breathing volunteer lung imaging was performed
based on a study approved by the local institutional review board with written
informed consent. The data acquisition was limited to the end-expiratory state using
a motion-sensing camera (VitalEyeTM, Philips, Best, The Netherlands)
with a gating efficiency of 60%. A combination of 16-channel anterior and
12-channel posterior phased array coils was used for signal reception. The sequence
parameters used for the volunteer scan are outlined in Table 1. The signal-to-noise
(SNR) ratio of the lung parenchyma was estimated on images by dividing the mean
signal measured in lung parenchyma and standard deviation measured in a large
blood vessel.Results and Discussions
As shown in Figure 1b, Fibonacci
ordering samples k-space more uniformly than the linear ordering at any given
time interval. This ordering may be more suitable for applying advanced
reconstruction techniques like KWIC12 for dynamic imaging
applications. Fibonacci ordering with all configurations had a substantially
smaller angular distance than linear ordering, shown in Figure 2a. Fibonacci ordering
with the 1 Hub configuration generally had a smaller angular distance than the
3 Hub configurations due to the acquisition of orthogonal hubs in successive
interleaves with the 3 Hub configuration. Images acquired with linear ordering
showed visible artifacts in both sequences.
In contrast, the Fibonacci
ordering had no noticeable artifact even in a highly interleaved configuration,
shown in phantom scans in Figure 2b. The differences are likely due to the long-term
eddy currents caused by the changing gradient moments for the different
ordering schemes. Free-breathing lung images acquired with FLORET-bSSFP are
shown in Figure 3. Fibonacci ordering showed minimal B0 artifacts
compared to the linear ordering and increased robustness to motion artifacts
(bulk, cardiac and, residual respiratory motion) with an increased number of
interleaves. Representative lung images acquired with FLORET-bSSFP and
FLORET-SPGR sequences using the proposed arm ordering scheme are shown in
Figure 4. The SNR of lung parenchyma obtained with FLORET-SPGR was 11.6, while
the SNR obtained with FLORET-bSSFP was 2.9. This difference in SNR may be due
to the scan time difference between the sequences, and we believe FLORET-bSSFP
can significantly benefit from further scan parameter optimization.Conclusion
The proposed trajectory ordering
for FLORET minimizes eddy current artifacts in both SPGR and bSSFP sequences while improving temporal stability and robustness to motion artifacts.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.
Pipe JG, Zwart NR, Aboussouan
EA, Robison RK, Devaraj A, Johnson KO. A new design and rationale for 3D
orthogonally oversampled k-space trajectories. Magn Reson Med.
2011;66(5):1303-1311. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22918
2.
Robison RK, Anderson III AG,
Pipe JG. Three-dimensional ultrashort echo-time imaging using a FLORET
trajectory. Magn Reson Med. 2017;78(3):1038-1049.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26500
3.
Gurney PT, Hargreaves BA,
Nishimura DG. Design and analysis of a practical 3D cones trajectory. Magn
Reson Med. 2006;55(3):575-582. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20796
4.
Madelin G, Kline R, Walvick R,
Regatte RR. A method for estimating intracellular sodium concentration and
extracellular volume fraction in brain in vivo using sodium magnetic resonance
imaging. Sci Rep. 2014;4(1):4763. doi:10.1038/srep04763
5.
Brown R, Lakshmanan K, Madelin
G, et al. A flexible nested sodium and proton coil array with wideband matching
for knee cartilage MRI at 3T. Magn Reson Med. 2016;76(4):1325-1334.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26017
6.
Willmering MM, Robison RK, Wang
H, Pipe JG, Woods JC. Implementation of the FLORET UTE sequence for lung
imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2019;82(3):1091-1100.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27800
7. Willmering
MM, Niedbalski PJ, Wang H, et al. Improved pulmonary 129Xe
ventilation imaging via 3D-spiral UTE MRI. Magn Reson Med.
2020;84(1):312-320. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28114
8.
H V. A better way to construct
the sunflower head. Math Biosci. 1979;44:179-189.
9.
Piccini D, Littmann A,
Nielles-Vallespin S, Zenge MO. Spiral phyllotaxis: The natural way to construct
a 3D radial trajectory in MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2011;66(4):1049-1056.
doi:10.1002/mrm.22898
10.
Krishnamoorthy G, Smink J, Tourais
J, Breeuwer M, Kouwenhoven M. Variable anisotropic FOV for 3D radial imaging
with spiral phyllotaxis (VASP). Magn Reson Med. 2021;85(1):68-77.
doi:10.1002/mrm.28449
11.
Pipe JG, Borup DD. Generating
spiral gradient waveforms with a compact frequency spectrum. Magn Reson Med.
n/a(n/a). doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28993
12.
Song HK, Dougherty L. k-Space
weighted image contrast (KWIC) for contrast manipulation in projection
reconstruction MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2000;44(6):825-832.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2594(200012)44:6<825::AID-MRM2>3.0.CO;2-D