3495

Simultaneous T1, T2 and T2* Quantification with MR Fingerprinting Using Dual-Echo Echo Planar Imaging
Di Cui1, Xiaoxi Liu1, Peng Cao2, Angela Jakary1, Jing Liu1, Janine Lupo1, Yan Li1, and Duan Xu1
1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States, 2The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

Synopsis

An MR fingerprinting method using dual echo EPI was developed in this study for simultaneous quantification of T1, T2, T2*, proton density and off resonance. In vivo evaluations performed in patients with lower grade glioma tumor demonstrated the ability of the technique to acquire multiple reflexivity maps within a clinically manageable scan time with each slice using 16 seconds and achieving total brain coverage in approximately four minutes.

Introduction

Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) [1] is a novel multi-parametric quantitative MRI approach, where quantification maps and images of multiple contrasts can be acquired in a single scan. In this study, an MRF strategy for simultaneous T1, T2 and T2* quantification of human brain is proposed using dual-echo echo planar imaging (EPI) readout and validated in brain tumor patients.

Methods

Acquisition: An IR-GRE-SSFP MRF sequence is developed, shown in Figure 1. Half scan is used for the first echo for shorter echo time (TE), rendering improved T2 weighting in its signal evolution. Each echo is from one of a 16-shot readout, and a Blip Up and Down Acquisition (BUDA)-like [2] sampling strategy is utilized. Both the shot index and phase encoding polarity are alternated between the 2 echoes, and among consecutive time frames, ensuring better k-space coverage and incoherence of image artifacts along time axis. Variable flip angle (maximum 70 degree) and constant repetition time (TR) are used. RF spoiling is added in the first 100 time frames, making the sequence a concatenation of inversion recovery gradient echo (IR-GRE) and steady-state free precession (SSFP). The flip angle train and rf phase train are shown as Figure 2.
Reconstruction: Images for each individual lobe are reconstructed with a time-resolved [3] approach. A low rank subspace reconstruction method [4,5] is used to solve:$$\mathop{\arg \min}\limits_{\alpha}\frac{1}{2}{\parallel}FSφU_k^Hα-y{\parallel}_2^2+λ∑_r{\parallel}R(α)\parallel_*\qquad(1)$$. where $$$y$$$ is the acquired data, $$$F$$$ is Fourier transform, $$$S$$$ is coil sensitivity profile which can be self-estimated from the data by temporal sharing. $$$φ$$$ is phase increment term of off resonance map times the echo time of each lobe. The off resonance map is calculated from the phase change of 2 echoes with smooth spatial variation as a priori. $$$U_k$$$ is suppressed from singular value decomposition (SVD) of pre-calculated dictionary, with the first k singular vectors as subspace bases. $$$α={U_k}x$$$ is the subspace representation of image series $$$x$$$. A locally low rank (LLR) term is used as regularization for better conditioning. Eq (1) is iteratively solved in reconstruction using alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) [6].
The dictionary was calculated using extended phase graph (EPG) [7] with parameters T1 within 200~5000ms, T2 within 20~3000ms and T2* within 10~100ms, yielding 332672 dictionary entries of all 23 EPI lobes at 500 timeframes. A comparison of the signal evolutions of different EPI lobes was shown in Figure 3 for the dictionary entry with T1 = 800ms, T2 = 80ms and T2* = 40ms. By SVD, the first 5 singular vectors were selected to ensure <0.2% error after compression, thus $$$23\times500=11500$$$ time points were represented by 5 subspace bases. Since T1 and T2 affect the signal evolution across different TRs, T1 and T2 maps as well as proton density were presented by dictionary matching. However, T2* weighted the images within each TR, so T2* was estimated by parameter fitting of the straightforward $$$e^{-t/T_2^*}$$$ decay term.
Experiments: All the in-vivo data were acquired on a GE 3T scanner (MR750, Waukesha, WI) with a 32-channel head coil. Other parameters included: TR = 33ms, TE1 = 4.4ms, TE2 = 20ms, FOV = 224mm2, resolution = 1 mm2 and EPI echo spacing = 1.2ms. 500 timeframes were acquired for each slice, and the scan time is 16s per slice. Patients with lower grade glioma were consented for evaluating the performance of the sequence. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board.

Results

Figure 3 shows the multiple-contrast images of a grade 2, post-surgical resection, glioma patient based on the dynamic images of different time frames (namely 5th, 48th, 258th and 400th timeframes). Intensity changes due to T2* decay was shown with the comparison of 2 readout lobes of each selected TR#. Tumor area can be observed in the images and an area with increased susceptibility due to surgery is observed in the 16th lobe.
Figure 4 shows the quantitative maps of T1, T2, and T2* after dictionary matching. Tumor area is delineated in each of the 3 maps and the area with severe susceptibility is observed in the T2* map. Results of clinical protocols of pre/post-gadolinium T1 weighted images from an IR-GRE sequence, and T2 weighted image from fast spin echo (FSE) sequence are also presented as references to show the consistency between MRF quantification maps and clinical images.

Discussion

In this study, the T2* weighting, better k-space sampling coverage and off resonance estimation from the two echoes contribute to subsequent reconstruction and parametric mapping. However, one dynamic image is reconstructed at every EPI lobe along the readout, providing more image contrasts and more accurate parameter mapping. Multiple quantitative maps including T1, T2, T2*, proton density, off resonance and multiple contrast images are acquired in a single scan. The various contrasts from this method are consistent with typical clinical scans. Off resonance and proton density maps from MRF reconstruction have shown potential to provide additional information. Further implementation would be improving the efficiency of the acquisition by using fewer time frames and 3D acceleration.

Conclusion

This application of MRF has demonstrated the potential to obtain quantitative relaxation maps of the brain simultaneously, saving valuable clinical scan time.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. Ma, Dan, et al. "Magnetic resonance fingerprinting." Nature 495.7440 (2013): 187-192.

2. Liao, Congyu, et al. "Distortion‐free, high‐isotropic‐resolution diffusion MRI with gSlider BUDA‐EPI and multicoil dynamic B0 shimming." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 86.2 (2021): 791-803.

3. Wang, Fuyixue, et al. "Echo planar time‐resolved imaging (EPTI)." Magnetic resonance in medicine 81.6 (2019): 3599-3615.

4. Assländer, Jakob, et al. "Low rank alternating direction method of multipliers reconstruction for MR fingerprinting." Magnetic resonance in medicine 79.1 (2018): 83-96.

5. Tamir, Jonathan I., et al. "T2 shuffling: sharp, multicontrast, volumetric fast spin‐echo imaging." Magnetic resonance in medicine 77.1 (2017): 180-195.

6. Boyd, Stephen, Neal Parikh, and Eric Chu. Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Now Publishers Inc, 2011.

7. Weigel, Matthias. "Extended phase graphs: dephasing, RF pulses, and echoes‐pure and simple." Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 41.2 (2015): 266-295.

Figures

Figure 1. Sequence diagram of consecutive time points of the dual-echo EPI MRF sequence. Half scan was used for the first echo for T2 weighting, and BUDA was utilized along the time points for better distributed k-space samplings.

Figure 2. Flip angle train (top) with the maximum flip angle of 70 degree, and RF phase train (bottom) for rf spoiling within the first 100 time frames

Figure 3. The top row shows the comparison of signal evolutions of 23 lobes with T1 = 800 ms, T2 = 80ms and T2* = 40ms. Some time frames were circled in the signal evolutions as the dynamic images of different contrast, as the bottom row. Arrow shows the tumor area for both echoes, and the area with severe susceptibility for the latter lobes. All the images are displayed in the same scale.

Figure 4. First row: Quantitative maps of T1, T2 and T2* after MRF reconstruction. Tumor area was pointed out for all 3 maps and the area with severe susceptibility was pointed out in T2* map. (unit: s) Second row: pre-gadolinium T1 weighted image, T2 weighted image and post-gadolinium T1 weighted image from clinical scan as reference. Third row: off resonance (unit: Hz) map and proton density map from MRF reconstruction.

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 30 (2022)
3495
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58530/2022/3495