Esther Rong1, Jason Matakas1, Steven Shamah1, Jenna Le1, Karen Sperling1, Can Wu2, and Qi Peng1
1Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States, 2Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
Synopsis
T1ρ
and T2 contrasts provide complementary information on tissue properties. Therefore, their transient recovery after
exercise to pre-exercise equilibria is potentially a functional biomarker for muscle
disorder diagnosis and treatment evaluation. In this pilot study, we
implemented and tested a high-temporal-resolution dynamic MRI sequence for
simultaneous T1ρ and T2 mapping immediately after exercise. T1ρ and T2 contrasts
presented unique transient recovery time courses in different skeletal muscles.
Dynamic information derived from our imaging
approach could potentially lead to greater sensitivity and specificity in
evaluating muscle conditions compared with traditional methods with either T1ρ or T2 contrast alone.
Introduction
Quantitative
biochemical MRI techniques including T1ρ and T2 mapping have been applied to
characterize biochemical microenvironment alterations in muscle tissues.1, 2 For example, muscle fibrosis is associated with loss
of macromolecules such as proteoglycans with excessive collagen. T1ρ contrast
is sensitive to interactions related
to the chemical exchange between extra-cellular water and macromolecules (such
as proteoglycans in muscles), while T2 contrast is sensitive to water content
and collagen content and structure.3 Therefore,
T1ρ and T2 contrasts
provide complementary information on tissue properties. Previous research studies
have utilized only one of the contrast mechanisms, typically under a static
setting. It has been shown that exercise
transiently increases the skeletal muscle water, and the associated T1ρ and/or T2
changes. Therefore, their transient recovery to pre-exercise equilibria is
potentially a functional biomarker for muscle disorder diagnosis and
treatment evaluation.4, 5 In this pilot study, we implemented
and tested a high-temporal-resolution dynamic MRI sequence for simultaneous T1ρ
and T2 mapping on a cohort of healthy young volunteers to investigate the
transient biochemical recovery of skeletal muscles post-exercise to: 1) demonstrate
the technical feasibility; 2) compare the T1ρ and T2 recovery response
characteristics for different muscle groups; and 3) identify possible
quantitative biomarkers for muscle tissue evaluation. Methods
Six healthy volunteers (5 male,
1 female, ages 27-33)
with no known
muscle-related conditions were recruited. Participants avoided
strenuous activity for 24 hours, prior to 20 min of stair-climbing activity.
Subjects were immediately scanned (<2.5 min post-exercise) on a 3T whole-body MR scanner
(Philips Ingenia Elition) with a 1Tx/16Rx knee coil. Both adiabatic T1ρ (adb-T1ρ)
and T2 mapping were integrated into a single MAPSS sequence
using an unpaired
phase-cycling scheme to improve imaging speed (Figure 1).6-8 The sequence schematic is shown in Figure 1. The
adb-T1ρ preparation had an RF train of adiabatic pulses (HS1), B1max = 26.19µT, ωmax=1.27kHz,
and R=6.9 The adb-T1ρ and
T2 preparations had 3D acquisitions with TSL=96+, 96- and TE = 40+, 40- ms
acquired in an interleaved fashion with alternating phase-cycling, in addition to sharing the
same TSL/TE=0ms acquisition.6, 7 Other parameters included
Tsr=2.5s, TI=1480ms, GRE readout train length=128, and compressed SENSE
factor of 4. The 3D dynamic sequence had ~1 min temporal resolution
with 0.4×0.7×4mm3 spatial resolution for ~25 minutes. Dynamic T1ρ
and T2 maps were generated simultaneously using a moving window approach
sequentially along the dynamic (temporal) direction after motion correction using Elastix.7 In each curve fitting, complex-valued images were
used in an optimization algorithm based on Powell minimization function in IDL. Seven regions-of-interest (ROIs) were drawn on five muscles
around the knee joint (medial and lateral heads of gastrocnemius, short head of
biceps femoris, semimembranosus, and vastus medialis) (Figure 2A). T1ρ changes
over time of these ROIs were curve-fitted using a mono-exponential recovery
model to obtain the characteristic recovery time. Similarly, T2 changes over
time were fitted with a linear model to obtain the recovery rate (defined as
the slope). The T1ρ and T2 recovery characteristics were compared for different
muscle groups. Results
Representative
T1ρ and T2 maps at ~3 min and ~28 min post-exercise are shown in Figures 2B-2E.
The recovery time courses of T1ρ and T2 are shown in Figures 2F and 2G,
respectively. Both T1ρ and T2 values for all muscles decreased from the initial
values during the dynamic scan duration. However, T1ρ and T2 of different
muscles had unique recovery amplitudes and time characteristics. Among all, vastus
medialis had both high recovery amplitude and fast recovery (T1ρ characteristic
recovery time of 5.12 min, and T2 recovery rate -0.24ms/min). Biceps femoris
and lateral gastrocnemius had slower T1ρ recovery time of 20.5 and 25 min respectively, while those of semimembranosus and medial gastrocnemius were less
than 4 min. For T2 recovery, medial gastrocnemius and semimembranosus underwent
the smallest decrease in T2 values within the scan duration, while vastus
medialis had greatest reduction. T1ρ contrast showed much higher dynamic range
than T2 contrast, potentially leading to higher
sensitivity for muscle biochemical changes post-exercise. Discussion
We
demonstrate the technical feasibility for simultaneous T1ρ and T2 mapping
during the transient recovery phase post-exercise. The major novel finding was the different transient recovery characteristics
between T1ρ and T2 contrasts, as well as among different muscle
groups around the knee joint following 20-min stair-climbing. Notable, the T1ρ
and T2 recovery time courses seemed to follow exponential decay and linear decay respectively. Although T1ρ and T2 contrasts are correlated, this observation further
supports that they offer complementary information of tissue properties. Therefore,
imaging both simultaneously may provide synergistic information to unravel
the complicated biochemical, hemodynamic, and functional processes during the
transient recovery phase after exercise, especially in myopathic conditions. Dynamic
information derived from our
imaging approach could potentially lead to greater sensitivity and specificity
in evaluating muscle conditions compared with traditional methods with either T1ρ or T2 contrast alone.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Laakso
H, Wirth G, Korpisalo P, et al. T2 , T1rho and TRAFF4 detect early regenerative
changes in mouse ischemic skeletal muscle. NMR Biomed. 2018;31(5):e3909.
2. Zhao Y, Guo L, Jiang Y, et al.
Assessment of Calf Skeletal Muscle in Male Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients
with Different Courses Using T1rho Mapping. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021.
3. Noehren B, Hardy PA, Andersen A, et
al. T1rho imaging as a non-invasive assessment of collagen remodeling and
organization in human skeletal muscle after ligamentous injury. J Physiol.
2021.
4. Patten C, Meyer RA, Fleckenstein JL.
T2 mapping of muscle. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2003;7(4):297-305.
5. Tawara N, Nitta O, Kuruma H, et al.
T2 mapping of muscle activity using ultrafast imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci.
2011;10(2):85-91.
6. Peng Q, Wu C, Kim J, et al.
Efficient Phase Cycling Strategy for High Resolution 3D GRE Quantitative MRI
Mapping. NMR in Biomedicine. 2021;Under Review.
7. Peng Q, Wu C. High Spatial
Resolution Simultaneous Quantitative T1rho and T2 Mapping at 3T. AAPM Annual
Meeting. 2021.
8. Li X, Han ET, Busse RF, et al. In
vivo T(1rho) mapping in cartilage using 3D magnetization-prepared
angle-modulated partitioned k-space spoiled gradient echo snapshots (3D MAPSS).
Magn Reson Med. 2008;59(2):298-307.
9. Wu C, Peng Q. 3D MAPSS T1ρ Mapping
with Adiabatic Spin-Locking RF Pulses for Knee and Brain at 3T. Proc Intl Soc
Mag Reson Med 29. 2021.