Stefan Zbyn1,2, Abdul Wahed Kajabi1,2, Ariel N. Rodriguez3, Gregory J. Metzger1, Robert F. LaPrade3, and Jutta M. Ellermann1,2
1Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States, 2Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States, 3Edina-Crosstown Surgery Center, Twin Cities Orthopedics, Minneapolis, MN, United States
Synopsis
Although T2 mapping allows noninvasive evaluation of meniscus
degeneration, its application at 7T requires spin echo sequences with
relatively long repetition times to meet the specific absorption rate (SAR) limits
which can restrict the resolution of maps. This 7T
study evaluates the potential of T2* mapping for the assessment of
meniscal degeneration in six patients with arthroscopically verified posterior root
tears of the medial meniscus and in healthy volunteers. Increased T2* in degenerated
meniscus regions suggest T2* mapping is sensitive to meniscus degeneration. T2*
mapping is a promising biomarker of early meniscal degeneration which is less SAR-demanding
than T2 mapping.
Purpose
Meniscal root tears are one of the highest risk factors for
the development and progression of knee osteoarthritis (1). The
ability to detect and quantify early changes in meniscal composition, prior to
the appearance of morphological changes, will improve the ability to monitor development
and progression of meniscus degeneration and study its relationship to knee
osteoarthritis. Recent studies have demonstrated a relationship between T2
relaxation times and meniscus degeneration (2, 3). Increased
meniscal T2 values were related to collagen network disorganization and
decreased collagen content (4). T2 mapping
of the meniscus at 7T requires spin echo sequences with relatively long
repetition times to meet specific absorption rate (SAR) limits which can limit the
spatial resolution.
The goal of this 7T study was to evaluate the potential
of T2* mapping for the evaluation of meniscal degeneration using multi-echo
gradient echo acquisition which is much less SAR demanding. Therefore, we
evaluated patients with arthroscopically verified posterior root tears of the medial
meniscus and compared T2* between: (i) different meniscus regions, (ii) and between
patients and healthy volunteers.Methods
This prospective, ongoing, IRB-approved study compares T2* and
arthroscopic results in medial meniscus. Six patients with a Type II posterior
root tear of the medial meniscus (mean age, 47 years; 4 women) received 7T MRI
and subsequently underwent arthroscopic repair of the root attachment.
Additionally, one volunteer with no knee symptoms and no suspicious MRI findings
was imaged with an identical protocol. Demographic details are listed in Figure 1.
All images were acquired on a 7T MRI (Siemens, Erlangen,
Germany) using a birdcage transmit / 28-channel receive phased-array knee coil
(Quality Electrodynamics, Mayfield Village, OH). The protocol included T1- and
T2-weighted turbo-spin echo sequences and a T2-weighted 3D SPACE acquisition with
fat suppression for the morphological evaluation of the knee joint (Figure 2A-D). Additionally, a 3D multi-echo
gradient recalled echo (GRE) sequence with seven TEs (3.1 - 21.4 ms) was acquired
to calculate T2* relaxation times in the menisci. MRI acquisition parameters
are listed in Figure 3.
Arthroscopic evaluation of cartilage and meniscus integrity
was performed during the repair of the posterior root attachment of medial
meniscus (Figure 2E). All chondral
lesions were classified according to the ICRS grading system (5, 6).
Meniscus degeneration was assessed by evaluating the surface integrity of i)
femoral surface, ii) tibial surface, and
iii) inner rim as described in the Pauli grading system (7).
T2* maps were calculated by fitting a
mono-exponential decay to the multi-echo data using a two-parametric least-square
fitting routine in Matlab (MathWorks) (Figure
4C). For the evaluation of the goodness of fit, the root means square error
(RMSE) was normalized to an estimated signal at a TE of 0 ms. Mean T2* was calculated in four 3D-regions
segmented on T2*-weighted images (TE= 6.1 ms) using ITK-SNAP (Figure 2F-H). Each medial meniscus, between
the anterior attachment and tear, was segmented into four regions: (i) anterior
horn, (ii) anterior body, (iii) posterior body, and posterior horn (Figure 2I). For statistical analyses, linear
mixed models, with age and body mass index as covariates, followed by Tukey’s
post-hoc tests were used to evaluate T2* differences between meniscal regions.
All p-values were adjusted for multiple pair-wise comparisons using Bonferroni
correction.Results
T2* mapping. More
than 5000 pixels per meniscal region were evaluated in each subject (Figure 5). We found significantly
higher T2* in the posterior horn of medial meniscus, in the region adjacent to the
root tear, when compared to the anterior horn (p<0.001) and anterior body (p<0.001)
regions. Additionally, T2* in the posterior body was also significantly higher
than T2* in the anterior horn (p=0.028) and anterior body (p=0.011) of the medial
meniscus. Furthermore, all mean T2* values were higher in patients than in a
healthy volunteer (Figure 5). All
mean normalized RMSEs were lower than 7% showing reasonable reliability of the fitted
results.
Arthroscopy. All evaluated medial menisci had complete
posterior root tears. Only one meniscus showed slight fibrillation at the inner
surface. The rest of meniscal surfaces were smooth. Two to five cartilage lesions
per patient were found, and each knee showed a lesion on the medial femoral
condyle and patella.Discussion
We found higher T2* in the posterior compared to the anterior
portion of the meniscus in patients with a posterior root tear of the medial
meniscus. Assuming that the posterior portion of the meniscus in these patients
is more degenerated than the anterior portion of meniscus, our results suggest
that T2* mapping is sensitive to meniscal degeneration. This conclusion also
agrees with the observation of lower T2* in all meniscal regions of a healthy
volunteer when compared to patients with meniscal root tears. Finally, our
observation is in line with previous studies reporting increased T2 in
degenerated menisci albeit with a higher spatial resolution and less SAR
intensive acquisition (2-4).
In conclusion, in vivo T2* mapping at 7T seems to be sensitive to changes in meniscal
composition and thus may provide a less SAR-demanding biomarker of early
meniscal degeneration when compared T2 mapping. Future studies with healthy
volunteers and with follow-up of patients after meniscal repair are needed to
verify this promising preliminary results.Acknowledgements
This
study was supported by the NIH NIBIB grant (P41 EB027061).References
1.) Floyd ER, et al. The Natural History
of Medial Meniscal Root Tears: A Biomechanical and Clinical Case Perspective.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021; 9: 744065.
2.) Son M, et al. Regional variation in
T1rho and T2 times in osteoarthritic human menisci: correlation with mechanical
properties and matrix composition. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013; 21(6): 796-805.
3.) Wang A, et al. MR T1rho and T2 of
meniscus after acute anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Osteoarthritis
Cartilage. 2016; 24(4): 631-9.
4.) Eijgenraam SM, et al. T2 mapping of
the meniscus is a biomarker for early osteoarthritis. Eur Radiol. 2019; 29(10):
5664-72.
5.) Brittberg M, Peterson L.
Introduction of an articular cartilage classification. ICRS Newsletter. 1998; 1(1):
5-8.
6.) Hjelle K, et al. Articular cartilage
defects in 1,000 knee arthroscopies. Arthroscopy. 2002; 18(7): 730-4.
7.) Pauli
C, et al. Macroscopic and histopathologic analysis of human knee menisci in
aging and osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011; 19(9): 1132-41.