Myung-Ho In1, Norbert G Campeau1, Joshua D Trzasko1, Daehun Kang1, Kirk M Welker1, John Huston III1, Yunhong Shu1, and Matt A Bernstein1
1Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
Synopsis
Echo-planar
based diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the brain is prone to local image distortion
which can lead to misdiagnosis or nondiagnostic image quality in areas prone to
susceptibility effects. A novel distortion-free imaging scheme, termed DIADEM
(Distortion-free Imaging: A Double Encoding Method) was recently introduced and
optimized for brain imaging on a high-performance experimental Compact 3T
system. In this study, we fully implement the DIADEM DWI technique on two 510-k
cleared, whole-body 3T scanners and explore the clinical feasibility for its
use in routine clinical practice.
Introduction
Clinical diffusion-weighted
imaging (DWI) is commonly based on echo-planar imaging (EPI) and suffers from susceptibility-
and diffusion-gradient-direction-oriented eddy-current-induced image distortions,
which often results in nondiagnostic image quality in local high susceptibility
areas of the brain and potentially lead to misdiagnosis (e.g., a false negative
or false positive result).
Recent technical advances such as parallel
imaging1, reduced FOV DWI2, and multi-shot approaches3,4 are improvements over routine
EPI-based DWI, however, the degree of distortion remains prominent at 3T,
especially in proximity to air-tissue interfaces. A novel distortion-free
imaging scheme, termed DIADEM (Distortion-free Imaging: A Double Encoding
Method) was recently introduced and optimized on a high-performance Compact 3T scanner5,6
and showed robust diffusion imaging in susceptibility prone regions. In this study, we implemented
DIADEM-DWI on two clinical 3T scanners and further characterized its
performance relative to conventional EPI-based DWI of the brain.Methods
Implementation
of online DIADEM reconstruction: The flowchart of online DIADEM reconstruction
pipeline is presented in Fig. 1. Due to its new imaging strategy that is not
supported by vendor reconstruction, the automatic DIADEM reconstruction
pipeline has been developed and is performed under MATLAB compiler runtime (MCR)
environment on a secure external high-performance reconstruction server located
outside the MRI network segment utilized with 16 multicore computing
processors. All network communications are initiated scanner-side and utilize
outbound communication pathways only to avoid any security issue – i.e., the server
is incapable of initiating a connection to the scanner. Sequential
reconstruction is conducted on the server to reconstruct all the DIADEM scans
from multiple scanners. As provided in vendor EPI-DWI reconstruction, a trace (i.e.,
combined DW images) and apparent-diffusion-coefficient (ADC) map are also calculated
in the DIADEM-DWI reconstruction.
Feasibility study for routine clinical practice:
DIADEM-DWI was first
evaluated for clinical use on a commercially available
(60 cm) whole-body 3T scanner with
a gradient performance of 50 mT/m and 200 T/m/s (MR750, GE Healthcare) and a
standard 8-channel coil (Invivo Corp). Under IRB-approved
protocols, first ten patients scheduled
for a clinical brain MRI exam with standard diffusion (i.e., EPI-DWI) were recruited
to additionally obtain the DIADEM-DWI scan for comparison. Next, the
comparison study was translated to a wide-bore (70 cm) 3T scanner with a lower gradient performance of 33 mT/m and 120 T/m/s (MR750W, GE Healthcare) using a 32-channel head coil (Nova
Medical). Clinical EPI-DWI scan was obtained on both whole-body 3T scanners with
following imaging protocols: FOV=220×220 mm2, matrix size
(readout×phase-encoding)=128×256, image resolution=1.72×0.86, 38 slices, slice
thickness=4 mm, one non-DW (i.e., T2) and three DW images with b=1000 mm2/s,
and scan time=1:00~1:10. The identical protocols were applied in DIADEM-DWI
scans on MR750/MR750W 3T scanners, except for the matrix size=220×120/200×200,
image resolution=1×1.83/1.1×1.1 mm2, multiband=1/2, and scan
time=4:00/3:59.Results and Discussion
Strong
local distortions are clearly visible in EPI-DWI near boundaries of temporal
and frontal lobes on a clinical whole-body 3T scanner (Fig. 2). In distinction,
negligible distortion was observed in DIADEM and the images matched very well
to the geometrically correct reference (i.e., fast-spin-echo) image. Since this
approach is immune to both T2* blurring and eddy-current-induced distortions
varying according to the applied (i.e., three) diffusion directions, the images
were visually much sharper than
EPI even though the intrinsic image resolution in EPI was slightly higher (Fig.
2). In addition, additional magnetic susceptibility artifacts induced by
metallic shunt components were effectively resolved in DIADEM imaging (Fig. 3).
Compared to the standard EPI-DWI, DIADEM-DWI
produced more reliable diffusivity
coefficients, even in local brain
structures with high susceptibility effects including internal auditory canal
(Fig. 4A), cisternal segment of the trigeminal nerve (Fig. 4A), and optic nerve
(Fig. 4B). Acquisition time for DIADEM-DWI was around 4 minutes compared to 1:10
minutes for EPI-based DWI, but still acceptable for clinical use. High image resolution on DIADEM was
possible using multiband imaging7 on the wide-bore 3T scanners,
even with the lower gradient performance MR750W scanner (Fig. 5). The
reconstruction time including the data transfer time over network were around 7
and 15 minutes, respectively without and with multi-band imaging protocol, which could be further reduced by translating the MATLAB- to C-based reconstruction algorithm
in future.
DIADEM-DWI provided improved depiction and conspicuity of brain structures compared to
standard EPI-DWI. DIADEM permitted more confident diagnosis
of small acute brain infarctions in local high-susceptibility areas that are commonly challenging to interpret, primarily because of fewer artifact-related false
positive and false negative results.
Visualization of cranial nerves, orbital and suprahyoid neck structures was
markedly improved with DIADEM. Evaluation of postoperative DWI changes was also
superior with DIADEM-DWI due to reduced image degradation related to
post-surgical susceptibility changes and areas of pneumocephalus.Conclusion
DIADEM
high-resolution distortion-free DWI was successfully implemented onto clinical 3T
scanners and demonstrated marked improvements in diffusion signal
characterization compared to the currently implemented EPI-based DWI,
especially in local high-susceptibility regions.Acknowledgements
This
work was supported by NIH U01 EB024450, NHI U01 EB026979, and Mayo Clinic
Imaging Biomarker Discovery Program.References
-
Bammer R, Keeling SL,
Augustin M, et al. Improved diffusion‐weighted single‐shot echo‐planar imaging
(EPI) in stroke using sensitivity encoding (SENSE). Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2001; 46(3): 548-54.
- Saritas EU, Cunningham CH,
Lee JH, Han ET, Nishimura DG. DWI of the spinal cord with reduced FOV
single‐shot EPI. Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine 2008; 60(2): 468-73.
- Chen N-K, Guidon A, Chang
H-C, Song AW. A robust multi-shot scan strategy for high-resolution diffusion
weighted MRI enabled by multiplexed sensitivity-encoding (MUSE). Neuroimage 2013; 72: 41-7.
- Holdsworth SJ, Skare S,
Newbould RD, Guzmann R, Blevins NH, Bammer R. Readout-segmented EPI for rapid
high resolution diffusion imaging at 3T. European
journal of radiology 2008; 65(1):
36-46.
- In MH, Posnansky O, Speck
O. High-resolution distortion-free diffusion imaging using hybrid spin-warp and
echo-planar PSF-encoding approach. NeuroImage
2017; 148: 20-30.
- In MH, Tan ET, Trzasko JD,
et al. Distortion‐free imaging: A double encoding method (DIADEM) combined with
multiband imaging for rapid distortion‐free high‐resolution diffusion imaging
on a compact 3T with high‐performance gradients. J Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 51(1):
296-310.
- Setsompop K, Gagoski BA, Polimeni JR,
Witzel T, Wedeen VJ, Wald LL. Blipped‐controlled aliasing in parallel imaging
for simultaneous multislice echo planar imaging with reduced g‐factor penalty. Magnetic resonance in medicine 2012; 67(5): 1210-24.