Margaret Caroline Stapleton1, Philipp Boehm-Sturm2, Stefan Koch2, Susanne Mueller2, Devin Raine Everaldo Cortes1, and Yijen Wu1
1Developmental Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States, 2Department of Experimental Neurology, Charite University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Synopsis
Allelic
difference in Apolipoprotein-E
(APOE) is a well-known risk factor for the late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD) but
how APOE affects brain functions and the subsequent cognitive declination
remains unclear. Diffusion MRI followed by network topology analysis found that APOE
deficiency in knockout mice resulted in altered neuronal network in the brain
regions known to be affected by Alzheimer’s Disease. This study suggests the possible role of APOE
in neuronal network organization, which might predispose brains to differential
AD vulnerability.
Introduction
It is estimated that over
5.8 million Americans have Alzheimer’s disease (AD) making it the fifth leading
cause of death in people over 65 years of age, a number increasing with time.
It is a national concern, as patients and families face the increased
emotional, physical and monetary stress of long term care as the disease’s
onset is slow [1]. Apolipoprotein E (APOE), a class of
lipoproteins involved in lipid and lipoprotein metabolism, is the strongest genetic risk factor
for the late-onset Alzheimer Disease (LOAD) [2, 3] with allelic differences [4].
However, how APOE influences brain function and subsequent cognitive
declination is unknown. We hypothesize
that APOE, known to affect synaptic plasticity [5], is important for establishing neuronal network. APOE
deficiency might lead to neuronal network remodeling which can attenuate
vulnerability for AD. The aim of this
study is to test this hypothesis in APOE knockout (KO) mice, using diffusion
MRI and graph theory to characterize the neuronal network topology. Method
A.
Animal
Model: 10 male APOE KO mice and
age-matched wild-type (WT) C57BL/6J controls were subjected to diffusion MRI
followed by topological analysis with graph theory.
B.
Diffusion
Tractography: Diffusion MRI was acquired
at 7-Tesla (Bruker Biospec USR 70/30) with the following parameters: 156-micrometer isotropic resolution, 30
diffusion directions, diffusion gradient length 4 msec, diffusion separation 8
msec, b = 1200 s/mm2. Neuronal
fiber tracking without assigning any region of interest (ROI) or region of
avoidance (ROA) were conducted using generalized deterministic fiber tracking
with 100,000 seeding points using the open source DSI Studio with a q-space
diffeomorphic reconstruction method.
C.
Segmentation
and Parcellation: Allen brain atlas was
used to register the 3D T2WT anatomical imaging with 78-micrometer isotropic
resolution and DTI as previous described [6] to parcellate
the whole brain into 72 regions.
D.
Network
analysis: Connectivity matrices
counting the connecting tracts between brain regions, graph theoretical
analysis, and diffusion parameters were calculated using DSI studios, then
averaged for 8 APOE KO and 8 WT mice. Only connecting regions that contributed
greater than 3% of the total tracts were including in connectivity matrices.
Statistics were calculated using student’s t-test. Network parameters were calculated based on
graph theory [7]. Results
Analysis of the left hemisphere
showed differences in the distribution of connections between regions. Visually,
a representative image of each animal shows that the majority of tract direction
differs, with wildtype mice fiber organization in the anterior/posterior
direction and APOE KO fiber in the medial/lateral direction. Differences in
fiber organization are prevalent in connections between the rest of the brain
and hippocampus or amygdala. Connectivity in the hippocampus, which plays a
role in learning and memory, differs in number of fiber connections, with
wildtype averaging 115,858 connections while APOE0 KO averaged 111,131
connections. Number of connections in the amygdala, a region also known for
memory processing as well as emotional response and decision making, differed
with wildtype averaging 25,628 connections and APOE KO averaging 20,147. Differences
in the distribution of these fibers for left brain, hippocampus, and the
amygdala are visible in the circular tables. (Figure 1)
Deeper analysis into the
amygdala proved that the number and distribution of fiber connections as well
as network measures were different between APOE KO and wildtype. Network
measures represent various conditions of the fiber tractography, such as the
likelihood that connections cannot be attributed to random chance, potential for
information flow between regions, and local connectedness. Wildtype mice were
found, on average, to have significantly higher network measures in the
amygdala than APOE KO mice suggesting that connectedness between the amygdala
and other regions of the brain was more efficient, less random, and more
connected than APOE0 KO (Figure 2).
Fractional anisotropy (FA)
in each brain region provided an insight into the organization of diffusion in
fiber tracts. Higher FA values indicate that diffusion is less random in fiber
tracts, suggesting that the fiber tracts could be denser and more myelinated.
11 of 36 regions in wildtype brains had an average FA value significantly
higher than APOE KO. (Figure 3)Conclusion
Our study showed that the
APOE deficiency in mice resulted in altered neuronal network organization.
Compared to APOE KO, WT brain networks showed higher levels of fiber tracts in
brain regions relevant to AD, more organized fiber distribution and higher
fractional anisotropy. Our study
suggests the potential role of APOE in neuronal network organization which may
influence AD vulnerability. Acknowledgements
MCS and YLW are supported by funding from NIH-R21-EB023507, AHA-18CDA34140024, and
DoD-W81XWH1810070. Funding to SM, SPK
and PBS was provided by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
under the ERA-NET NEURON scheme (BMBF 01EW1811), and the German Research
Foundation (DFG, Project BO 4484/2-1 and EXC NeuroCure).References
1. 2020 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.
Alzheimer's & Dementia, 2020. 16(3):
p. 391-460.
2. Hersi, M., et al., Risk factors associated with the onset and
progression of Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review of the evidence.
Neurotoxicology, 2017. 61: p.
143-187.
3. Yu, J.T., L. Tan, and J. Hardy, Apolipoprotein E in Alzheimer's disease: an
update. Annu Rev Neurosci, 2014. 37:
p. 79-100.
4. Holtzman, D.M., et al., Expression of human apolipoprotein E reduces
amyloid-beta deposition in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. J Clin
Invest, 1999. 103(6): p. R15-r21.
5. Kim, J., et al., Apolipoprotein E in synaptic plasticity and
Alzheimer's disease: potential cellular and molecular mechanisms. Mol
Cells, 2014. 37(11): p. 767-76.
6. Koch, S., et al., Atlas registration for edema-corrected MRI
lesion volume in mouse stroke models. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2019. 39(2): p. 313-323.
7. Rubinov, M. and O. Sporns, Complex network measures of brain
connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage, 2010. 52(3): p. 1059-69.