Sadeq S Alsharafi1, Haile Baye Kassahun1, Ahmed M Badawi1, and AbdEl-Monem M El-Sharkawy1
1Systems and Biomedical Engineering, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
Synopsis
Eddy-currents are generated in MRI scanners’ metallic structures due to
the rapid switching of gradient coils. They may result in image distortions and
induce acoustic-noise particularly for fast/spiral sequences. Transient eddy-currents computations can be used to understand the extent of such effects. In this
work, a numerical framework was devised to compute transient eddy-currents induced by an amplitude-modulated sinusoidal pulse for a longitudinal gradient
coil configuration. Stream functions representation of eddy-currents, Multilayer Integral Method, and an excitation current with amplitude-modulated sinusoidal function
are used to solve the circuit equation and efficiently compute transient eddy-currents
generated in the cryostat.
Introduction
Rapid
switching of gradient coils generates undesirable eddy-currents in the
surrounding metallic structures of the MRI scanner including spiral K-space
acquisition. It is noted that gradient pulse functions used for spiral imaging
may involve amplitude-modulated sinusoidal functions1. Harmonic
and transient eddy-currents analysis have been previously described2,3. In both the network analysis (NA) method2 and Multilayer Integral Method (MIM)3, the eddy-currents problem is reduced to a
circuit equation representation (differential equation of the first order). The
circuit equation in the NA method represents directly eddy-currents while it
represents stream functions in the MIM method (eddy-currents are calculated
using stream functions). Only transient eddy-currents computations for a
trapezoidal gradient pulse have been performed in a previous study2. In this work, we compute transient eddy-currents
induced by an amplitude-modulated sinusoidal pulse in the scanner’s cryostat. As we have
previously shown, we now use an adapted MIM computational framework for generality4 where we solve here the circuit equation in the time domain for an amplitude-modulated sinusoidal excitation current.Methods
Same dimensions of a
self-shielded unconnected z-gradient coil and cryostat as in references2,4 are used in
this work. The cryostat is meshed into a single layer of triangular elements, (Fig.1). Each triangle node is locally
numbered from 1 to 3 and globally labeled by a unique number3,5,6.
The current density flowing inside a triangle is given as follows:$$\vec J_e=\vec e_1\phi_1+\vec e_2\phi_2+\vec e_3\phi_3$$ where $$$\vec e_1,\vec e_2$$$ and $$$\vec e_3$$$ are the vectors facing the triangle nodes divided
by the double area of the triangle, $$$\Phi_1,\Phi_2$$$ and $$$\Phi_3$$$
are the stream function values at the
triangle nodes. The source coil is considered as a thin wire coil carrying a
time-varying current s(t). In
the time domain, the circuit equation is given as:$$R_{nm}\Phi+M_{nm}\frac{d\Phi}{dt}=-M_{n0}\frac {ds(t)}{dt}$$ where $$$\Phi$$$ is a vector that contains the stream function
of all nodes in the conducting structure. $$$M_{n0}$$$
is a vector containing the mutual inductance
between the arbitrary nodes š on the metallic structure and the segments of
the source coil. $$$R_{nm}$$$ and $$$M_{nm}$$$ are the resistance and inductance matrices due
to the interaction of any arbitrary nodes n and m.
The matrices $$$M_{n0},R_{nm}$$$ and $$$M_{nm}$$$
are constructed as in
references3,4,7. For
transient solution, the current source s(t) is represented by amplitude-modulated
sinusoidal function which
is described as $$$s(t)=At\ sin(2\pi ft+\theta)$$$ and its derivate is given as: $$\frac {ds(t)}{dt}=A\ sin(2\pi ft+\theta)+2Af\pi t\ cos(2\pi ft+\theta)$$ where A is a scalar (At represents the time-dependent
current magnitude), f is the frequency of the pulse, and θ is a
general phase term. The circuit equation above is a first-order differential
equation and its solution is given as:$$\Phi(t)=\Phi(0)\ e^{(-λt)}+U[\frac {1}{(4π^2 f^2+λ^2)^2}AQ[[2πfλ (4π^2 f^2 t+λ^2 t-2λ)]\ cosā”(2πft+θ)+(16π^4 f^4t +4π^2f^2λ^2 t-4π^2f^2λ+λ^3)\ sinā”(2πft+θ)+4πfλ^2e^{(-λt)}]]$$ where $$$Q=-U^{-1}M_{nm}^{-1}M_{n0}$$$ , $$$\Phi(0)$$$ is the initial value of the stream functions. λ and U are the eigenvalue vector and eigenvector
matrix respectively of $$$M_{nm}^{-1}R_{nm}$$$. The z-gradient used in our simulations has a
primary coil radius of 330mm and a secondary coil radius of 420 mm with 116
total turns. The cryostat is a stainless-steel cylinder with 450mm radius,1700mm
height, 3.18mm thickness, and 96x10-8 resistivity.
The parameters of the excitation pulse are set as A=104, f=1KHz, and θ=0. The resolution of the cryostat meshes has edge lengths less than 30mm and the
coil tracks is divided into 20mm segments. Computations are performed using MATLAB
(MathWorks, MA).Result and Conclusion
Eddy-currents
induced by an amplitude-modulated sinusoidal function are calculated for a time
interval from 0 to 11 ms with a 2μs time step. The implemented
framework shows high efficiency in terms of time and memory relative to other
commercial EM computational tools4 as was previously shown. The whole simulation including the
constructions of the matrices and solving the circuit equation takes around
20mins while the memory used is approximately 2GB. Fig.2 shows the magnitude of
eddy-currents density distribution on the cryostat at selected ten-time points
labeled in the figure. The magnitude of eddy-currents at arbitrary points A and B on the
cryostat (depicted in Fig.1) are plotted along with the excitation amplitude-modulated sinusoidal pulse versus time in Fig.3. The results show the ability of the framework to
perform temporal eddy-currents computations for an amplitude-modulated sinusoidal
function which, up to our knowledge has not been previously shown. The computational
framework achieved in this work may be further developed applying more
realistic gradient pulses used during spiral imaging sequences to compute
resultant eddy-currents as well as analyzing their effect on MR imaging
associated distortions. Also, the computation can be performed using transverse
gradient coil configurations. Acknowledgements
Sadeq S. Alsharafi is partially financially supported for his Ph.D program at Cairo
University by the Yemeni ministry of higher education. Haile Kassahun is financially supported by the African Biomedical Engineering Mobility (ABEM) for his Ph.D. program at Cairo University. The ABEM project is funded by the Intra-Africa Academic Mobility Scheme of the Education, Audiovisual, and Cultural Executive Agency of the European Commission.References
- Brown RW, Cheng YCN, Haacke EM,
Thompson MR, Venkatesan R. Magnetic
Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design. John Wiley
& Sons; 2014.
- Kidane TK, Edelstein WA, Eagan TP, et
al. Active-passive shielding for MRI acoustic noise reduction: Network
analysis. IEEE transactions on magnetics.
2006;42(12):3854-3860.
- Sanchez Lopez H, Freschi F, Trakic A,
et al. Multilayer integral method for simulation of eddy currents in thin
volumes of arbitrary geometry produced by MRI gradient coils. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2014;71(5):1912-1922.
- Alsharafi SS, Badawi AM, El-Sharkawy
AM. A Comparative Study for Evaluating Passive Shielding of MRI Longitudinal
Gradient Coil. 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in
Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC); 2021.
- Kameari A. Transient eddy current
analysis on thin conductors with arbitrary connections and shapes. Journal of Computational physics. 1981;42(1):124-140.
- Lemdiasov RA, Ludwig R. A stream
function method for gradient coil design. Concepts
in Magnetic Resonance Part B: Magnetic Resonance Engineering: An Educational
Journal. 2005;26(1):67-80.
- Alsharafi SS,
Badawi AM, El-Sharkawy AM. Design of a Self-Shielded Transverse MRI Gradient
Coil Taking into Account Track Width. Paper presented at: 2020 IEEE 5th Middle
East and Africa Conference on Biomedical Engineering (MECBME)2020.