Hongxi Yang1, Ankang Gao2, Yida Wang1, Xu Yan3, Jingliang Cheng2, Jie Bai2, and Guang Yang1
1Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China, 2Department of MRI, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China, 3MR Scientific Marketing, Siemens Healthineers, Shanghai, China
Synopsis
We
had retrospectively enrolled 371 glioma patients in this study to develop an
automated scheme to predict epilepsy in patients with WHO II-IV grade cerebral
gliomas from multi-parametric MRI (mp-MRI). Gliomas tumor was segmented by a
segmentation model trained with nnU-Net. Then a classification model based on
ResNet-18 using segmented tumor region as anatomical attention was used to
predict epilepsy from mp-MRI images. In the independent test cohort, the segmentation
model achieved a mean dice of 0.899, while the classification model achieved an
AUC of 0.890, better
than the baseline ResNet-18 model with a test AUC of 0.783.
Introduction
The
cerebral gliomas are the most common primary tumors in adults. Half of all
glioma patients and up to 89% low grade glioma (LGGs) patients have epilepsy
experience1-2. Glioma-associated epilepsy (GAE)
greatly impairs the patients’ life quality, and the patients could develop status
epilepticus and multiple seizures without regaining consciousness. Early diagnosis
of epilepsy is vital for protecting neurocognitive function, limiting
progression and improving patients’ quality of life.
Multi-parametric
magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) is an essential preoperative examination
for patients with glioma3 and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have
been used in glioma-related tasks, such as tumor segmentation and
classification4-5. Thus, in this study, we aimed to develop a fully-automated
approach to predict epilepsy in patients with WHO II-IV grade cerebral gliomas, with
a segmentation model to outline gliomas tumor and an attention-guided
classification model for epilepsy diagnosis. Methods
We
had enrolled 371 consecutive glioma patients who underwent MRI scanning before
surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from August 2016
through August 2019. MR images of patients were scanned on 3T MRI scanners
(Magnetom Trio TIM/Prisma, Verio or Skyra, Siemens Healthcare; Discovery 750,
GE Medical Systems). The dataset was divided into 298 (163 epilepsy/135 no
epilepsy) training cohort and 73 (40 epilepsy/33 no epilepsy) test cohort. For each
patient, T2-weighted (T2W) images, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps (calculated
with diffusion-weighted images b=0, 1000s/mm2) and post-contrast
T1-weighted (T1Gd) images were aligned onto T2 Fluid Attenuated Inversion
Recovery (T2-FLAIR) images with Elastix. All images were resampled to a
resolution of 0.688mm×0.688mm×6.500mm (inter-slice)
and padded to 360×360×20. Volumes of
interest (VOIs), including
the entire tumor and peritumoral edema, were manually drawn slice-by-slice on T2-FLAIR images by a radiologist with 5 years of experience in
neuro-oncology and were reviewed and modified (if necessary) by a
neuroradiologist with 20 years of experience in neuroradiology.
A modified nnU-Net6 based on T2-FLAIR images was trained
to accomplish automated
segmentation of the tumor and
peritumoral edema. The nnU-Net framework is a convenient and effective
segmentation method designed to deal with diverse dataset. We used 5-fold cross
validation to train the model, using stochastic gradient descent (SGD) as
optimizer, with a learning rate of 0.01, momentum of 0.99, and the max epoch of
300.
Our classifier for epilepsy prediction was derived
from the well-known 18-layer ResNet architecture and a novel anatomical
attention gate7 (Figure 1). 3D T2-FLAIR, T2W, T1Gd images, and ADC
maps were concatenated in the channel dimension. Then the multi-channel image and tumor segmentation
were parallelly fed into 7×7×7 convolution and through an anatomical gate to fuse feature maps generated
by MR images and tumor region. The proposed model contained four residual
blocks and each block included two 3×3×3 convolutional layers follow by BN and ReLU. We used Adam as optimizer,
with an initial learning rate of 0.001. Prediction of epilepsy was mean ensembled
by five models selected through a 5-fold cross validation.
We compared the performance of proposed classifier
with the baseline ResNet-18, which only used multi-channel images as input. The
receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and confusion matrix were
utilized to evaluate the classification performance.Results
The
segmentation model achieved a mean dice of 0.890±0.118 and 0.899±0.064 in the training
and independent test cohort, respectively. Figure 2 shows the segmentation
results and ground truth from three patients in the test cohort.
Our
attention-guided classification model achieved a training AUC of 0.991 (95% confidence
interval (CI): 0.982-0.997) and a test AUC of 0.890 (95%
CI: 0.803-0.955), while baseline model obtained a training AUC of 0.929 (95%
CI: 0.900-0.957) and a test AUC of 0.783 (95% CI: 0.666-0.882). The ROC curves of
our attention-guided model and baseline model were plotted in Figure 3. The
confusion matrix of two models were shown in Figure 4 and statistics analysis was
listed in Table 1.Discussion and Conclusion
In
this study, we proposed a fully automated approach to diagnose epilepsy for
patients with different grade glioma from mp-MRI, with a segmentation model and
a classification model. Manual segmentation requires a lot of expertise and
skills, while automatic segmentation reduced workload and improved consistency.
Although our segmentation was not
perfect, it could still help to improve diagnosis via attention mechanism. The
anatomical attention gate fusing glioma tumor region and mp-MRI feature maps can
be employed as the guidance to improve the prediction. Hence, our method outperformed
baseline ResNet-18 in the prediction of epilepsy with a higher AUC and accuracy
on the same test cohort. Compared with previous work8, this study covers
not only LGG but also high grade of glioma with a better performance in
diagnosis of epilepsy.
Since the preoperative diagnosis of GAE was
made based on clinical signs, electroencephalography (EEG) and imaging findings,
a neuroradiologist is hard to diagnosis epilepsy only on MRI9. However,
our work showed that mp-MRI has the potential to diagnosis epilepsy without
other information, making diagnosis a non-invasive, automated and easy-to-use process. In the future, this
study will be extended to incorporate radiomics feature to the deep learning
classification model, and software integrating the whole pipeline will be
developed so that the approach can be test further in a multi-institutional,
clinical environment.Acknowledgements
This project is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (61731009).References
1. Englot DJ, Chang EF, Vecht CJ. Epilepsy and brain
tumors. Handb Clin Neurol. 2016; 134: 267–85.
2. Pallud J,
Audureau E, Blonski M, et al. Epileptic seizures in diffuse low-grade gliomas
in adults. Brain. 2014; 137(2): 449–462.
3. Upadhyay N, Waldman
AD. Conventional MRI evaluation of gliomas. Br J Radiol. 2014; 84(2): 79-226.
4. Korfiatis P, Erickson
B. Deep learning can see the unseeable: predicting molecular markers from MRI
of brain gliomas. Clin Radiol. 2019; 74(5): 367-373.
5. Naser MA, Deen MJ.
Brain tumor segmentation and grading of lower-grade glioma using deep learning
in MRI images. Comput Biol Med. 2020; 121.
6.
Isensee F, Jaeger PF, Kohl SA, et al. nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for
deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nat Methods. 2020; 18(2): 203–211.
7.
Sun L, Shao W, Zhang D, et al. Anatomical Attention Guided Deep Networks for ROI
Segmentation of Brain MR Images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2020; 39(6):
2000-2012.
8.
Liu Z, Wang Y, Liu X, et al. Radiomics analysis allows for precise
prediction of epilepsy in patients with low-grade gliomas.
Neuroimage Clin. 2018; 19: 271–278.
9. Liang S, Fan X,
Zhao M, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of
adult diffuse glioma-related epilepsy. Cancer Med. 2019; 8(10): 4527-4535.