Jun Wang1, Guangyao Liu1, Pengfei Zhang1, Kai Ai2, Laiyang Ma1, Wanjun Hu1, and Jing Zhang1
1Magnetic Resonance, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China, 2Philips Healthcare, Xi’an, China
Synopsis
Diagnosis and differential
diagnosis of Inflammatory
Bowel Disease (IBD) remains
challenge since the particularity of
small bowel. The objective of this study was to use the contrast enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) radiomics to distinguish subtypes of IBD patients. A total of 216 patients confirmed by pathology underwent small bowel CE-MRI.
After the pipeline of radiomics, it was found that wavelet transformed texture
features can effectively identify ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) with high
performance. This work
provides more detailed and microscopic details for the differential diagnosis
of IBD subtypes based on the preliminary results.
Introduction
Inflammatory
bowel disease (IBD) is a group of non-specific chronic and recurrent
inflammatory diseases of the bowel, characterized by abnormal intestinal edema and thickening caused by
immune response1. The diagnosis
and differential diagnosis of Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC),
is often challenging due to the limitations of small bowel visualization2. Traditional diagnostic methods of either
CD or UC are established based on the clinical manifestation, laboratory tests,
imaging techniques, endoscopy, and histopathology results3. The specific objective
of this study was to explore the radiomics features based on MR images as
potential biomarkers to distinguish between CD and UC objectively,
quantitatively, and reproducibly.Materials and Methods
In this retrospective study, a total of 216 patients (mean age 32, SD ± 4.52)
underwent MRI scanning, 100 of whom had been previously diagnosed with CD and
116 with UC who underwent colonoscopy and contrast enhanced MRI scans between
2012 and 2021 were included. The protocols of the contrast-enhanced T1-weighted
imaging based on mDixon: repetition time = 1100 ms, field of view = 374 × 132
mm2, time echo = 80 ms, 105 axial slices, slice thickness = 1.1 mm,
flip angle = 90°. Gadopentetate dimeglumine (0.1 mmol/kg) were taken as the
contrast agent. Radiomics features of MRI effectuated were retrospectively analyzed
to classify IBD by PyRadiomics4. Imaging was conducted on
both 3T MR scanner (Ingenia CX, Philips Healthcare, the Netherlands) and 1.5T
MR scanner (Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany). Data were extracted by
manually drawn regions of interest (ROI) in abnormally thickened intestinal
wall. Radiomics feature extraction was carried out in compliance with the image
biomarker standardization initiative (IBSI) guidelines. Amount to 1037 radiomics
features (for more detailed information, see table 1) were extracted from
regions of interest (ROIs) on MRI images after applying two
Laplacian-of-Gaussian (LoG) filters known as spatial scaling factors (SSFs)
(SSF = 4; SSF = 5) and wavelet transform. Then, calculating the consistency of
two expert extraction features, select the features with intra-class
correlation coefficient (ICC) >0.75 for subsequent feature screening. Lasso
regression model was utilized to pick 15 features and build radiomics signature5. In binary classification, patient labels were
determined through previous clinical diagnoses, where all patients had relevant
pathological examination reports before MRI scan. Subsequently, multiple
machine learning algorithms evaluate the accuracy of these features to classify
UC and CD based on scikit-learn6 with python (v3.6.5), together with univariate
and multivariate analysis. Within the model, tenfold cross validation was
implemented. In addition, supervised learning implementing SHapley Additive
exPlanations (SHAP) (https://github.com/slundberg/shap) allowed binary
classification of the patients to explain the weight of variables in the models
and to ensure their interpretability. Findings were validated through Logistic
Regression (LR), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Naïve Bayes (NB), Support Vector
Machine (SVM), Gradient Boosting Trees (GBT) and Decision Tree (DT) models with
10-fold cross validation. The proposed analysis workflow is illustrated in
Figure 1.Results:
The radiomics signatures were found highly efficient for machine
learning to differentiate UC from CD. The highest performance, with an area
under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.874 (95%
confidence interval: 0.81–0.91), 80.0, 81.0, and 78.0%, respectively, in the
test set to identify the two diseases by Logistic Regression model. The
performance of GBT and SVM model is similar. The detailed ROC curves are
illustrated in Figure 2.Discussion:
This study investigated the value of CE-MRI radiomics features for differential
diagnosis of IBD subtypes. The results show that the features extracted by the
imaging features can be used as effective biomarkers for disease differential
diagnosis. This is consistent with the previous results7. Radiomics can provide more details of images and help to evaluate the
disease more comprehensively and accurately. The study offers some important
insights into a deeper understanding of additional information on intestinal
thickening and enhancement in IBD. Another observation was that 9 of 15
significant predictors were calculated from decomposed MRI data after the
wavelet transform, which are often difficult to judge by the naked eyes of
junior radiologists. SHAP summary plot results indicated, among others, “10 Percentile”
from log-sigma 5mm 3D, “Contrast” from GLCM, and first-order “Mean” transformed
by wavelet as the strongest indicators to predict disease subtype (shown as
Figure 3). Above results indicates that wavelet image decomposition enhanced
the discriminatory power of radiomics, possibly due to the noise suppression
and identification of frequency bands that better capture the actual imaging
phenotype variability. Enhanced images can reflect intestinal inflammation more
valuable information on blood supply, internal lesions and more.Conclusion:
In our study, the MRI-based radiomics models demonstrated similar
performance with the machine learning model in differential diagnosis.
Radiomics texture features can serve as potential biomarkers for distinguishing
CD and UC. While the radiomics model established by logical regression showed
better diagnostic performance than others. The model interpretation of SHAP
shows that the characteristics of wavelet features can effectively distinguish
the two disease. The radiomics model centered on enhanced MRI shows its
robustness in the differential diagnosis of IBD. Radiological features may be a
potential source of biomarker-based disease classification and diagnosis.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Sands B E. Biomarkers of Inflammation in Inflammatory Bowel
Disease[J]. Gastroenterology, 2015, 149(5): 1275-1285.e1272.
2. Biernacka K B, Barańska D, Matera K, et al. The value of magnetic
resonance enterography in diagnostic difficulties associated with Crohn's
disease[J]. Pol J Radiol, 2021, 86: e143-e150.
3. Maaser C, Sturm A, Vavricka S R, et al. ECCO-ESGAR Guideline for
Diagnostic Assessment in IBD Part 1: Initial diagnosis, monitoring of known
IBD, detection of complications[J]. J Crohns Colitis, 2019, 13(2): 144-164.
4. Van Griethuysen J J M, Fedorov A, Parmar C, et al. Computational
Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype[J]. Cancer Res, 2017,
77(21): e104-e107.
5. Li Z, Sillanpää M J. Overview of LASSO-related penalized regression
methods for quantitative trait mapping and genomic selection[J]. Theor Appl
Genet, 2012, 125(3): 419-435.
6. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, et al. Scikit-learn: Machine
learning in Python[J]. the Journal of machine Learning research, 2011, 12:
2825-2830.
7. Li H, Mo Y, Huang C, et al. An MSCT-based radiomics nomogram combined
with clinical factors can identify Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis[J].
Ann Transl Med, 2021, 9(7): 572.