Miyuki Takasu1, Konagi Takeda1, Saki Kawai1, Nobuko Tanitame1, Akihisa Tamura1, Makoto Iida1, Yuji Akiyama2, and Kazuo Awai2
1Diagnostic Radiology, Hiroshima City Hiroshima Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan, 2Diagnostic Radiology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
Synopsis
We established and validated the feasibility of an
MRI-based radiomics nomogram to differentiate between multiple myeloma (MM) and
bone metastasis
of breast cancer (BC). Regions of interest were drawn for the largest bone
lesion per patient on T1- and T2-weighted images of patients with MM (n = 85) and
BC (n = 70) from two institutions. The machine learning model with logistic
regression resulted in the best performance for differentiating MM from BC with
both sequences in the test cases. Our proposed clinical
radiomics analysis shows promise in differentiating MM from bone metastasis of BC.
Introduction
Multiple lytic bone lesions during
diagnostic imaging workup, suggesting either metastatic lesions or primary bone
tumors, clinically constitute a diagnostic dilemma in patients without a relevant
clinical history. Multiple myeloma (MM) is the most common type of primary bone
tumor, annually affecting approximately 50,000 patients in the United States. Breast
cancer (BC) is known to show late recurrence (more than 10 years after initial
treatment), and to favor bone as a metastatic site.1
Radiomics is an advanced
radiological imaging analysis that utilizes quantitative features extracted
from MRI together with machine learning for the diagnosis and prediction of
bone lesions.2,3 However, to our knowledge, no previous study
concerning the differentiation MM from BC using MRI-based radiomics nomogram has
been reported.
The
purpose of this study was to establish and validate an MRI-based radiomics
nomogram using T1-weighted and T2-weighted images for differentiation between MM
and bone metastasis
of BC.Methods
We retrospectively analyzed MRIs
of 155 patients with MM (n = 85) and bone metastasis of BC (n = 70) treated
from 2001 to 2021 at two institutions.
MRI included 2D T1-weighted
spin-echo and T2-weighted spin-echo sequences using either a 3-T system (n = 65)
or a 1.5-T system (n = 90). Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn for the
largest bone lesion per patient using a semiautomatic segmentation method by a
radiologist with 28 years' experience in musculoskeletal imaging.
A total of 851 texture features,
including first-order features, morphological features, second-level GLCM
(Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix) and GLDM(Gray-Level dependent Matrix)texture features were extracted
automatically from the T1-weighted and T2-weighted images using radiomics plugin
(http//:www.slicer.org). The mean decrease in Gini was used to reduce
overfitting in the model and highly correlated features were removed using the
Pearson correlation coefficient. Finally, the 10 most important features for
establishing the radiomics model were determined.
For data classification and
model building, a graphical user-interface-based software (Orange Data Mining)
was used. We compared the effectiveness of five machine learning approaches: a
logistic regression (LR) classification algorithm, a random forest classifier,
a support vector machine, a multi-layer perceptron algorithm and a Naive Bayes
(NB) algorithm.
We trained the models using 145 data
for T1-weighted images and 115 data for T2-weighted images. The validation
fraction was 10% of the training data. Next, we tested the model on
data from the five most-recent independent patients from each type of pathology.
A nomogram was drawn for the test data sets.
Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were
used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the radiomics model and a
calibration curve was drawn to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the models.
Measures of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and areas under the curve (AUC)
were estimated.Results
For the
T1-weighted images, the highest AUC value for differentiation between MM
and BC in the training set was 0.925 by NB, and its accuracy,
specificity and sensitivity were 0.892, 0.83 and 0. 892, respectively (Fig. 1).
For the T2-weighted images, the highest AUC value for differentiation between MM
and BC in the training set was 0.963 by NB, with accuracy,
specificity and sensitivity of 0.908, 0.908 and 0.916, respectively (Fig. 2).
The highest
value of AUC in the test set was 0.920 by LR, with accuracy, specificity and
sensitivity of 0.800, 0.800 and 0.800, respectively for T1- and T2-weighte
images (Fig. 3). AUC values obtained by NB-based nomogram were almost similar
to those obtained by other algorithms except for LR and NB-based nomogram did
not improve diagnostic accuracy for differentiation between these entities.
Figure 4 shows the diagnostic
performance of the radiomic features derived using T1- and T2-weighted images to distinguish between MM and BC. The radiomic features for T1-weighted images had a slightly
better predictive value than for T2-weighted images, with the highest AUC value
of 0.942 for wavelet- HHHfirstorderVariance.Discussion
This preliminary analysis showed
that our radiomics analysis could non-invasively distinguish between bone
lesions due to MM and metastatic BC.
The results from the test cohort
and the predictive performance with the dataset were comparable between
T1-weighted and T2-weighted images, which is contrary to expectations because signal
intensity within bone lesions is typically more homogenous on T1-weighted images
than on T2-weighted images. This could probably be because subtle changes in
signal intensity or texture within the lesion can be observed by the radiomics
method but not
by visual interpretation by a human reader.
The study protocol using independent test
cohorts in this study demonstrated that our machine learning model has the potential
for generalization to test data set, although more training datasets are necessary
to achieve stable performance.Conclusion
Our radiomics-based machine
learning model allowed differentiation of bone lesions due to MM and BC. Routine
incorporation of automated feature extraction algorithms into basic sequences in
clinical radiology practice might have potential in the non-invasive diagnosis
of MM and BC when the patients’ clinical history is unavailable. Our NB-based nomogram did not improve diagnostic accuracy
for differentiation between these entities.
Validation
of this initial study with larger patient cohorts and in combination with sequences
such as diffusion-weighted imaging might offer additional radiomic features and
improve the performance of the model.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.
Nishimura R, Osako
T, Nishiyama Y, et al. Evaluation of factors related to late recurrence -later
than 10 years after the initial treatment- in primary breast
cancer. Oncology. 2013;9:100–110.
2.
Yin P, Mao N, Wang S
et al. Clinical-radiomics nomograms for pre-operative differentiation of sacral
chordoma and sacral giant cell tumor based on 3D computed tomography and
multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol. 2019; 92:20190155.
3.
Lang
N, Zhang Y, Zhang E, et al. Differentiation of spinal metastases originated
from lung and other cancers using radiomics and deep learning based on DCE-MRI.
Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;64:4-12.