Yucai Bai1, Jian LI1, Xiaocheng Wei2, Yaoxing Ma1, and Bing Chen1
1General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Ningxia yinchuan, China, 2GE Healthcare, Beijing, China
Synopsis
The
purpose of this study is to explore the value of different quantitative
parameters derived from Synthetic MRI and combined with DWI in the diagnosis of
hippocampal sclerosis. It was concluded that the
values of T1, T2 and ADC in the hippocampal sclerosis were significantly higher
than those in the normal control group .In
addition, the AUC of the combined model of T2 and ADC was 0.96, which was
higher than that of ADC (AUC 0.884) or
T2 alone (AUC 0.952). Its sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value
and negative predictive value were 0.95,0.91,0.81,0.98 respectively.
Introduction
Medial
temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) is the most common type of refractory temporal
lobe epilepsy, and its most common cause is hippocampal sclerosis[1], which is characterized by
massive loss of neurons in the hippocampus and reactive proliferation of glial
cells[2]. Surgical resection of epileptogenic foci is an effective
method to cure medial temporal lobe epilepsy[3], but how to
effectively locate the side and focus before operation is a big challenge. In clinic, the diagnosis of
MTLE and the evaluation of the efficacy of drug treatment mainly rely on
clinical symptoms and EEG[4]. Quantitative MRI and DWI have been
widely used in the localization of hippocampal sclerosis[5-7]. In
recent years, with the emerging novel synthetic MRI technology (MAGiC), which
is based on the multi-delay saturated multi-echo
(multiple-delaymultiple-echo,MDME) fast spin echo pulse sequence, absolute
quantification of T1, T2, and PD maps can be generated simultaneously in a
single scan. Contrast-weighted images can then be reconstructed based on the
measurement of tissue physical properties with this technique. The purpose of this study
is to explore the value of different quantitative parameters derived from Synthetic
MRI in the diagnosis of hippocampal sclerosis and to further evaluate the
diagnostic efficacy of synthetic MRI parameters combined with diffusion-weighted
imaging in epileptic foci of hippocampal sclerosis.Material and Methods
Our Institutional
Review Board approved the protocol and written informed consent was obtained
from each subject. From October 2020 to October 2021, on the
basis of clinical history, manifestation, interictal scalp
electroencephalography and radiologic image
features (hippocampal atrophy and higher signal intensity of hippocampi on
T2-weighted images), a total of 22 hippocampal sclerosis
patients, along with 1 pathologically confirmed hippocampal sclerosis
patient, were included in the study (HS group). As a control group, 56 age
matched subjects were recruited from the
local community. All subjects underwent MRI examination
on a 3.0T scanner (Signa Architect, GE Healthcare) with a 48-channel phased
array head coil. Briefly, imaging protocol include traditional epilepsy MRI
protocol (3D T1 weighted imaging, 3D T2 weighted and T2FLAIR imaging),
diffusion weighted imaging and MAGiC. Detailed MAGiC scan parameters are as
follows: TR:4417ms, two echoes (TE1: 22.9 msec, TE2: 97.8 msec) were acquired
under four different delay times (176, 680, 1850, and 3855 msec), slice
thickness: 3.0mm, slice spacing: 0mm, number of excitation times 1, bandwidth:
22.73Hz. Quantitative measurements, including T1, T2, and PD maps, were
generated from the raw data produced by the MAGiC imaging sequence using a
vendor-provided program (MAGiC, v. 100.1.1). For ADC, T1, T2 and PD maps, 3 ROIs
are drawn manually at the head, body and tail of hippocampus to form an average
value. Differences in the parameters between HS group and control group were
compared with an independent Student’s t-test. Quantitative parameters with
significant differences between HS and control groups were further combined for
multiparametric analysis with logistic regression. The area under the receiver
operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), sensitivity (Sen), specificity (Spe),
positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were
calculated at maximal Youden’s index. P < 0.05 was considered statistically
significant.Results
In
23 patients with hippocampal sclerosis, the values of T1, T2 and ADC in the
ipsilateral hippocampus were significantly higher than those in the normal
control group(Table1, Figure2). No significant difference observed for PD
between the 2 groups. The ROC analysis results are summarized in table 2. The ROC curves
plotted in Figure1. T2 value demonstrated best performance in univariable analysis,
with AUC 0.95, sensitivity 0.82,
specificity 0.98, PPV 0.95 and NPV 0.93 respectively. In addition, the AUC of the
combined model of T2 and ADC was 0.96, which was higher than that of ADC alone
(AUC 0.884) or T2 alone (AUC 0.952). its sensitivity, specificity, positive
predictive value and negative predictive value were 0.95,0.91,0.81,0.98
respectively(Table2, Figure1).Discussion and Conclusion
In
this study the difference of quantitative MR parameters including T1, T2, PD,
and ADCs, and the multiparametric strategies that contained more than one of
the parameters, were all evaluated between MTLE hippocampal sclerosis and
normal controls. The results demonstrated that the quantitative T1, T2, and ADC
values differ significantly in hippocampal sclerosis patients over controls.
However, PD was not statistically significant. Our findings was consistent with
the results of CongyuLiao et al[8]. This may be related to the loss
of neurons and cell proliferation in the hippocampus. The area under the ROC
curve of T2 combined with ADC (AUC 0.961) is higher than the area under ROC
curve of ADC alone (AUC 0.884), suggesting that the integrated MRI quantitative
metrics can be used as an important reference index of hippocampal sclerosis in
medial temporal lobe epilepsy. To conclude, Quantitative synthetic MRI might be
beneficial in the diagnosis of hippocampal sclerosis. The approach combining T2
relaxation time (T2) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from DWI demonstrates
highest AUC.Acknowledgements
This abstract would not have been possible
without the consistent and valuable reference materials that I received from my
tutor, whose insightful guidance and enthusiastic encouragement in the course
of my shaping this abstract definitely gain my deepest gratitude.References
[1] Blumcke I, Spreafico R, Haaker G, et
al. Histopathological Findings in Brain Tissue Obtained during Epilepsy
Surgery[J]. N Engl J Med, 2017, 377(17): 1648-1656.
[2] Peixoto-Santos J E, Kandratavicius L,
Velasco T R, et al. Individual hippocampal subfield assessment indicates that
matrix macromolecules and gliosis are key elements for the increased T2
relaxation time seen in temporal lobe epilepsy[J]. Epilepsia, 2017, 58(1):
149-159.
[3] Téllez-Zenteno J F, Dhar R, Wiebe S.
Long-term seizure outcomes following epilepsy surgery: a systematic review and
meta-analysis[J]. Brain, 2005, 128(5): 1188-1198.
[4] Tsougos I, Kousi E, Georgoulias P, et
al. Neuroimaging methods in Epilepsy of Temporal Origin[J]. Curr Med Imaging
Rev, 2019, 15(1): 39-51.
[5] Vos S B, Winston G P, Goodkin O, et
al. Hippocampal profiling: Localized magnetic resonance imaging volumetry and
T2 relaxometry for hippocampal sclerosis[J]. Epilepsia, 2020, 61(2): 297-309.
[6] Sato S, Iwasaki M, Suzuki H, et al. T2
relaxometry improves detection of non-sclerotic epileptogenic hippocampus[J].
Epilepsy Res, 2016, 126: 1-9.
[7] Forster A, Griebe M, Gass A, et al.
Diffusion-weighted imaging for the differential diagnosis of disorders
affecting the hippocampus[J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2012, 33(2): 104-15.
[8] Liao C, Wang K,
Cao X, et al. Detection of Lesions in Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy by Using MR
Fingerprinting[J]. Radiology, 2018, 288(3): 804-812.