Thomas Welton1,2, Amadis Aliya Ong3, Septian Hartono1,2, Yao-Chia Shih4, Amanda Lee3, Eng-King Tan1,5, and Ling Ling Chan1,3
1National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore, 2Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore, 3Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore, 4Graduate Institute of Medicine, Yuan Ze University, Taiwan, Taiwan, 5Neurology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
Synopsis
Differential diagnosis of essential tremor and Parkinson’s disease can be
challenging due to overlapping clinical presentations, but these diseases
differ in neuropathological features, which may be detected using diffusion
spectrum imaging. We identified parts of a tremor-related cerebello-thalamo-cortical
network based on diffusion spectrum imaging that differed among a cohort comprising
essential tremor and Parkinson’s patients, and healthy-controls. The patient
groups had minimally-overlapping areas of abnormal microstructure in the
tremor-network, and these were significantly correlated with clinical and
kinetic measures of tremor severity. A future DSI-based marker of
tremor-network microstructure may aid in differential diagnosis of essential
tremor and Parkinson’s disease.
Introduction
Essential
tremor (ET) is characterized by upper limb action tremor in the absence of
other neurological signs1, while Parkinson’s disease (PD) is
characterized by rest tremor and bradykinesia. Clinical differentiation of ET
from PD can be challenging, especially in patients who display no evidence of
dopaminergic deficit.
While both ET
and PD are associated with dysfunctional oscillation of a common “tremor
network” (Fig. 1), they have contrasting neuropathological profiles. ET
is not regarded as neurodegenerative, but shows cerebellar morphological
changes in some patients1. On the other hand, PD is
neurodegenerative and is associated with Lewy body inclusions.
Diffusion
spectrum imaging (DSI) is an MRI technique that can model complex intravoxel
fiber orientation distributions, allowing more detailed assessments of
microstructure than conventional diffusion tensor imaging2.
We aimed to
identify differential patterns of aberrant tremor network microstructure using
DSI among the following groups: (1) ET, (2) PD, (3) healthy controls and (4)
patients who were initially diagnosed with ET but whose diagnosis was later
changed to PD.Methods
Subjects were
recruited from neurology clinics at Singapore General Hospital between September
2018 and February 2020.
Tremor
severity was scored using The ET Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS), the Unified
PD Rating Scale (UPDRS) and Kinesia One (Great Lakes NeuroTechnologies,
Cleveland, OH), a wearable motion sensor device providing quantitative
real-time motion data3.
DSI data were
acquired on a 3T Siemens PRISMA scanner (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen,
Germany) using a 32-channel head coil with the following parameters:
simultaneous multislice factor = 2, TR = 3943ms, TE = 110ms, flip angle = 60°, 129 diffusion weighted volumes, 13 shells, scan time= 9 minutes
24 seconds, max b-value = 3000, matrix = 120 x 120, FOV = 240 x 240, number of
slices = 81, slice thickness = 2mm.
DSI data were
reconstructed using the generalized q-sampling approach in DSI Studio (version 2021
May)4. Tremor network regions (motor cortex, thalamus and
cerebellum) were mapped to the diffusion data. Fiber tract connections between the motor
cortex and cerebellum were generated. From each tremor network region and
generated tract, we extracted the following metrics: fractional anisotropy
(FA), mean diffusivity (MD), normalized quantitative anisotropy (NQA),
isotropic diffusion component (ISO), restricted diffusion index (RDI) and
non-restricted diffusion index (NRDI).
We first
compared the patient groups to the control group on each combination of the DSI
metrics and tremor network regions while controlling the false discovery rate
(α=0.1). We then used principal components analysis to extract the dominant
pattern of disease-specific tremor network microstructure within the ET and PD groups.
Using this, we tested how strongly each pattern was expressed in the other
groups, and whether it correlated with tremor severity.Results
We included 26
ET, 22 healthy controls, 8 PD, and 6 ET-to-PD patients (Table 1). The groups
did not differ on age (one-way ANOVA, p=0.22). Fig. 1 shows an example
subject with regions and generated tracts overlaid.
Both PD and ET
groups had significant differences from controls, which only minimally
overlapped. ET patients had higher MD in the right cerebellum and right
precentral gyrus, lower FA in the left thalamus and right precentral gyrus, and
lower RDI in the right thalamus (p-values: 0.008, 0.003, 0.006, 0.002, 0.008).
PD patients had higher MD in the right thalamus, lower FA in the left and right
thalamus, lower ISO in the left precentral gyrus, lower NRDI in the right
precentral gyrus and right motor tract (p-values: 0.007, 0.005, 0.006, 0018,
0.003, 0.009).
Patterns of
disease-specific tremor network microstructure were extracted for the PD and ET
groups, explaining 42% and 49% of variance, respectively. The ET-like pattern
was most strongly weighted toward NQA and ISO in the cerebellum bilaterally and
NRDI in the motor tract bilaterally. Conversely, the PD-like pattern was
strongly weighted toward NRDI in the cerebellum, thalamus and motor tract
bilaterally. Fig. 2 shows a comparison between the four groups for the
disease-specific tremor network microstructure pattern scores, which had
significant differences (one-way ANOVA p-values: 0.011, 0.031 for ET and PD,
respectively). The likeness expression
of the ET-to-PD group was closer to PD than ET.
In the ET group, the ET tremor network likeness
score was significantly correlated with the TETRAS (p=0.011; Fig. 3),
the UPDRS motor parts II (p=0.046) and III (p=0.018) and also with the
real-time motion sensor measures: “rapid-alternating-movements-amplitude”
(p<0.001) and “hand-movement-amplitude” (p=0.027). In the PD group, the PD
tremor network likeness score was significantly correlated only with the speed
of finger tapping (p=0.003).Discussion
We present the
first study of DSI in ET. We identified patterns of tremor network microstructure
that differed between ET and PD, and correlated with multiple measures of
clinical severity. This supports the presence of microstructural changes in the
ET brain and a greater relevance of the implemented tremor-network
microstructure approach for ET than for PD. Differentiation of ET and PD by DSI
is supported by the non-overlap of significant differences and by variation across groups in the expression of ET and PD network
likeness.Conclusion
These findings
support the notion of MRI-based markers to aid clinical differential diagnosis
of ET and PD. Future work will refine such a marker and test its classification
performance in larger samples.Acknowledgements
TW acknowledges the support of the National Medical Research Council (OFYIRG20nov-0032).References
1. Welton T, Chan L, Carr J, Cardoso F, Deutchl G, Jankovic J
& Tan EK, 2021. Essential Tremor. Nature Reviews Disease Primers.
(accepted).
2. Wedeen VJ, Hagmann P, Tseng WYI, Reese TG and Weisskoff
RM, 2005. Mapping complex tissue architecture with diffusion spectrum magnetic
resonance imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 54: 1377-1386.
3. Giuffrida JP, Riley DE, Maddux BN & Heldman DA, 2009.
Clinically deployable Kinesia technology for automated tremor assessment.
Movement Disorders 15; 24(5):723-30.
4. Yeh FC, 2021. DSI Studio (Version 2021 May). Zenodo.
http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4764264