Suguru Yokosawa1, Toru Shirai1, Yoshitaka Bito2, and Hisaaki Ochi1
1Innovative Technology Laboratory, FUJIFILM Healthcare Corporation, Tokyo, Japan, 2Radiation Diagnostic Systems Division, FUJIFILM Healthcare Corporation, Chiba, Japan
Synopsis
Previously, we have proposed the method for characterizing the intra-voxel
spatial distribution of apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) by using texture analysis and
showed that texture features can provide different information from the
conventional diffusion tensor imaging. In this study, we extended our method to
the apparent kurtosis coefficients (AKC). We compared the features of the intra-voxel spatial
distribution of ADC with that of AKC. We found that there is no significant difference in the spatial
distribution of AKC from that of ADC, and a short scanning time with a single
b-value may be sufficient to obtain information on diffusion distribution.
Introduction
DWI (diffusion-weighted imaging)
is a promising method for characterizing microstructural changes or differences
in neuropathological features. Several approaches for apparent diffusion
coefficient (ADC) modeling and the estimation of the probability density function
(PDF) have been proposed to better understand tissue microstructures. Especially
for PDF, the spherical harmonic-based analysis, which is mainly used to map the
exact fiber orientation, is useful to improve the reliability of tractography1,
2. However, these techniques are not suited to extract information on non-fibrous
microstructures from diffusion orientation distribution. Previously, we
proposed the method for characterizing
the intra-voxel spatial distribution of diffusion by using texture analysis
with GLCM (gray level co-occurrence matrix) to extract non-fibrous
tissue information from the diffusion orientation distribution. We applied the
method on Gaussian diffusion model and found that texture features obtained
from the spatial distribution of
ADC can provide different information from the conventional DTI (diffusion
tensor imaging)3.
In this study, we extended our method to the
diffusion kurtosis model. This time we compared the features of the intra-voxel spatial
distribution of ADC with that of apparent kurtosis coefficients (AKC).Methods
Figure 1 shows the diagrammatic illustration
of characterizing the intra-voxel spatial
distribution of diffusion parameters by using texture analysis. First, triangular elements are created using the
Delaunay triangulation from the diffusion gradient directions used in the
measurement. Next, the diffusion parameters along the diffusion gradient directions
are calculated and normalized to M
gradation. Then GLCM is created, and texture features are calculated for each
voxel. In this study, we calculated the uniformity (ASM: angular second
moment), a local difference (IDM: inverse difference moment), contrast
(Contrast), randomness (Entropy), and local correlation (Correlation) as the
texture features.
As a measurement, two-dimensional
spin-echo diffusion-weighted echo planner imaging was performed on a healthy
volunteer brain using a 3 T MRI system. Images of 60 gradient directions and three
b-values (0, 1000, and 2500 s/mm2) were obtained. Other parameters
were as follows: TR/TE, 4000/86.7 ms; FOV, 240 mm; matrix, 128×96;
thickness/interval, 4/5 mm; a number of slices, 20. Figure 2 shows the data
processing flow. ADCs along the diffusion gradient directions, mean diffusivity
(MD) image and fractional anisotropy (FA) image were calculated using two
b-values (0 and 1000 s/mm2). AKC along the
diffusion gradient directions and mean
kurtosis (MK) image were calculated using three b-values (0, 1000, and 2500 s/mm2).
The regions were segmented into white matter (WM), gray matter (GM), and
cerebral spinal fluid (CSF), and the texture feature images of ADC and AKC were
calculated in each region, respectively. The segmentation was performed
according to the following rules: CSF is a region with MD ≥ 1.2×10-3 mm2/s,
WM is a region with MD < 1.2×10-3 mm2/s and FA ≥ 0.2,
GM is a region with MD < 1.2×10-3 mm2/s and FA <
0.2. This
study was approved by the ethics committee of FUJIFILM Healthcare Corporation. Data from volunteers were obtained following
the receipt of written informed consent.
Results
Figure
3 shows the MD, FA, and MK images and texture feature images (ASM, IDM,
Contrast, Entropy, and Correlation) of
ADC and AKC. Focusing on the regions of high FA in white matter, Contrast
accentuates the regions of high anisotropy. On the other hand, IDM and Entropy
show high signals even in the low FA regions including gray matter. In
addition, IDM and Entropy show different contrast from MD, FA, and MK. The texture
features images calculated from ADC and AKC are very similar. Figure 4 shows scatter
plots between texture features of ADC and that of AKC. Table 1 shows the
correlation coefficient between texture features of ADC and that of AKC. There
was a high correlation between the intra-voxel spatial distribution of the ADC
and that of AKC in all regions of WM, GM
and CSF.Discussion
The
texture features calculated from the spatial distribution of the diffusion
parameters have a different contrast from the conventional diffusion indices
MD, FA, and MK. The results suggest that texture features have different
information about the spatial distribution from MD, FA, and MK. On the other
hand, there was a high correlation between the texture features calculated from
the spatial distribution of ADC and those calculated from the spatial
distribution of AKC. This suggests that there is no significant difference in
the information on the spatial distribution of AKC from that of ADC. In other
words, the multi b-value measurement for non-Gaussian analysis may not be
necessary to obtain the information of spatial distribution. As a limitation,
the present study was conducted on healthy subjects. Previous studies have
suggested that MK is a promising indicator for the early diagnosis of neurodegenerative
diseases and the differentiation of high-grade and low-grade gliomas4,5,
and further studies in disease cases are needed.Conclusion
We
have investigated the
relationship between diffusion modeling and orientation distribution of
diffusion parameters by comparing the features of the intra-voxel spatial distribution of ADC and that
of AKC. It was shown that there
is no significant difference in the information on the spatial distribution of AKC
from that of ADC, and a short scanning time with a single b-value may be
sufficient to obtain information on diffusion distribution.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
- Tournier JD, Calamante F, Gadian DG, et al.
Direct estimation of the fiber orientation density function from
diffusion-weighted MRI data using spherical deconvolution, NeuroImage
2004;23(3):1176–1185.
- Descoteaux M, Angelino E, Fitzgibbons S, et
al. Regularized, Fast, and Robust Analytical Q-Ball Imaging, Magn Reson Med.
2007;58(3):497-510.
- Yokosawa S, Toru S, Bito Y, et al. Characterizing
intravoxel spatial distribution of diffusion based on texture analysis, proceedings
of ISMRM 2020, 4378.
- Arab A, Wojna-Pelczar A, Khairnar A, Szabó
N, Ruda-Kucerova J. Principles of diffusion kurtosis imaging and its role in
early diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders, Brain Res Bull. 2018;139:91-98.
- Abdalla G, Dixon L, Sanverdi E, et al. The
diagnostic role of diffusional kurtosis imaging in glioma grading and
differentiation of gliomas from other intra-axial brain tumours: a systematic
review with critical appraisal and meta-analysis, Neuroradiology. 2020;62:791–802.