Georgios Batsios1, Meryssa Tran1, Celine Taglang1, Anne Marie Gillespie1, Sabrina Ronen1, Joseph Costello2, and Pavithra Viswanath1
1Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States, 2Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
Synopsis
Metabolic reprogramming is a fundamental hallmark of
cancer, which can be exploited for non-invasive tumor imaging. Deuterium
magnetic resonance spectroscopy (2H-MRS) recently emerged as a
novel, clinically applicable method of non-invasively monitoring flux from 2H-labeled
substrates to metabolic products. However, to date, preclinical studies have
been performed in vivo, an endeavor that suffers from low-throughput and
potential waste of animal lives, especially in treatment response studies. Here, we demonstrate the ability to
quantify metabolism of 2H-MRS probes in live cell suspensions. Our
studies will expedite the identification of novel 2H-MRS probes for
imaging brain tumors and potentially other cancers.
Introduction
Metabolic
reprogramming is a fundamental hallmark of cancer, which can be exploited for
non-invasive tumor imaging1,2. Deuterium magnetic
resonance spectroscopy (2H-MRS) recently emerged as a novel,
non-invasive, translational method of interrogating flux from 2H-labeled
substrates to metabolic products3. However, to date,
preclinical studies have been performed in vivo3-8, an endeavor which suffers
from low-throughput and potential wastage of animal lives, especially when longitudinal
studies of treatment response are needed. Developing cell-based assays for
monitoring metabolism of 2H-labeled substrates will enhance
throughput, lead to the rapid evaluation of new 2H-based probes, and
enable identification of treatment response biomarkers, thereby allowing the
best 2H-labeled probes to be translated for further in vivo
assessment. The goal of this study was to develop a preclinical cell-based
platform for quantifying metabolism of 2H-labeled probes in brain
tumor models and evaluate the ability of this platform to detect metabolic
changes associated with treatment response.Methods
Cell studies: We examined normal
human astrocytes (NHACONTROL), patient-derived glioblastoma (GBM1),
patient-derived oligodendroglioma (BT88) and patient-derived pediatric diffuse
midline glioma (SF7761). All cells were maintained as previously described9-13.
Treatment: GBM1 and BT88 cells
were treated with a combination of irradiation (10Gy) and temozolomide (TMZ; 100μM) for 72h before
the MRS experiment. SF7761 cells were treated for 72h with 2μM ONC20614-16.
2H-MRS of live cells: Cells
were incubated in media containing 10mM [U-2H]-pyruvate or 12.5mM
[6,6’-2H]-glucose or 5mM [2,3-2H]-fumarate for 72h. Live
cells were harvested, suspended in saline in 12mm glass vials and 2H-MR
spectra acquired using a 16mm 2H single loop surface coil (DOTY
Scientific) on a Varian 14.1T vertical MR scanner (Agilent Technologies). A
pulse-acquire sequence (TR=260ms, NA=2500, complex points=512, flip angle=64o,
spectral width=2kHz) was used. Corrected amplitudes (for saturation) of fitted
water and lactate peaks were converted to concentration in millimolar using the
natural abundance HDO signal (12.8mM) collected from a similar vial containing
only saline. The latter was determined assuming a 55.5M water concentration and
a deuterium natural abundance of 0.0115%3. Data
analysis was performed using MestReNova.
Statistical analysis: All
results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance
was assessed using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test with p<0.05
considered significant.Results and Discussion
2H-lactate production is higher in glioma
cells vs. normal astrocytes Since the Warburg effect, which is characterized by elevated glycolytic flux
to lactate, is a metabolic phenotype of cancer17,18, including gliomas, we examined metabolism
of [6,6’-2H]-glucose or [U-2H]-pyruvate in patient-derived
glioblastoma (GBM1), oligodendroglioma (BT88) or pediatric diffuse midline
glioma (SF7761) cells and compared to immortalized normal human astrocytes (NHACONTROL).
Following incubation in media containing [U-2H]-pyruvate or [6,6’-2H]-glucose (Fig.1A),
2H-MR spectra obtained from live cell suspensions showed significantly
higher 2H-lactate production in GBM1, BT88 and SF7761 cells relative
to NHACONTROL (Fig.1B-E).
2H-lactate production is reduced in response
to therapy Having established our ability
to monitor metabolism of 2H-labeled agents in glioma cell models, we
examined whether 2H-MRS reports on response to combined radiation
and TMZ (TMZ+IR), which is the standard of care for adult glioma patients19,20. We found that 2H-lactate
production from [U-2H]-pyruvate or from [6,6’-2H]-glucose
was significantly reduced in GBM1 or BT88 cells subjected to irradiation and
temozolomide (88.1% drop, p<0.001; N=4 and 86.5% drop, p=0.002; N=3 for GBM1
and BT88 labeled with [U-2H]-pyruvate respectively; 92.6% drop,
p=0.006; N=3 and 89.9% drop, p=0.006; N=3 for GBM1 and BT88 labeled with [6,6’-2H]-glucose
respectively). These results point to the utility of our cell-based platform for
detecting response to chemoradiotherapy (Fig. 2A-D).
2H-malate production from [2,3-2H]-fumarate
report on cell death Previous
studies indicate that the imipridone drug ONC206 induces apoptosis in tumors,
including diffuse midline gliomas14-16. Studies have also shown that 2H-malate
production from [2,3-2H]-fumarate is a sensitive marker of cell
death induced by chemotherapy5. We, therefore, examined whether our cell-based
assay allows detection of ONC206-mediated cell death in pediatric diffuse
midline glioma SF7761 cells. As shown in Fig. 3A-3B, we were able to detect 2H-malate
production from [2,3-2H]-fumarate in ONC206-treated cells but not in
vehicle controls.Conclusions
We have, for the first
time, developed an assay that allows quantification of the metabolism of 2H-MRS
probes in live cell suspensions. Importantly, we have validated the utility of
our assay to differentiate glioma cells from normal astrocytes and to assess
response to therapy in patient-derived glioma models. Our studies will expedite
the identification of novel 2H-MRS probes for imaging brain tumors
and potentially other types of cancer.Acknowledgements
This
study was supported by NIH R01CA239288, Department of Defense W81XWH201055315
and UCSF Brain Tumor Center Loglio and NICO initiatives.References
[1] Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. Hallmarks of cancer:
the next generation. Cell 144, 646-674,
doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 (2011).
[2] Kim,
M. M., Parolia, A., Dunphy, M. P. & Venneti, S. Non-invasive metabolic
imaging of brain tumours in the era of precision medicine. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology 13, 725, doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.108 (2016).
[3] De
Feyter, H. M. et al. Deuterium
metabolic imaging (DMI) for MRI-based 3D mapping of metabolism in vivo. Sci Adv 4, eaat7314, doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat7314 (2018).
[4] Lu,
M., Zhu, X. H., Zhang, Y., Mateescu, G. & Chen, W. Quantitative assessment
of brain glucose metabolic rates using in vivo deuterium magnetic
resonance spectroscopy. Journal of
cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International
Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 37, 3518-3530 (2017).
[5] Hesse,
F. et al. Monitoring tumor cell death
in murine tumor models using deuterium magnetic resonance spectroscopy and
spectroscopic imaging. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118, doi:10.1073/pnas.2014631118
(2021).
[6] Kreis,
F. et al. Measuring Tumor Glycolytic
Flux in Vivo by Using Fast Deuterium MRI. Radiology
294, 289-296,
doi:10.1148/radiol.2019191242 (2020).
[7] Veltien,
A. et al. Simultaneous Recording of
the Uptake and Conversion of Glucose and Choline in Tumors by Deuterium
Metabolic Imaging. Cancers (Basel) 13, doi:10.3390/cancers13164034 (2021).
[8] von
Morze, C. et al. Comparison of
hyperpolarized (13) C and non-hyperpolarized deuterium MRI approaches for
imaging cerebral glucose metabolism at 4.7 T. Magn Reson Med 85,
1795-1804, doi:10.1002/mrm.28612 (2021).
[9] Kelly,
J. J. et al. Oligodendroglioma cell
lines containing t(1;19)(q10;p10). Neuro-oncology
12, 745-755, doi:10.1093/neuonc/noq031
(2010).
[10] Mancini,
A. et al. Disruption of the beta1L
Isoform of GABP Reverses Glioblastoma Replicative Immortality in a TERT
Promoter Mutation-Dependent Manner. Cancer
cell 34, 513-528.e518,
doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2018.08.003 (2018).
[11] Sarkaria,
J. N. et al. Use of an orthotopic
xenograft model for assessing the effect of epidermal growth factor receptor
amplification on glioblastoma radiation response. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American
Association for Cancer Research 12,
2264-2271, doi:10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-05-2510 (2006).
[12] Hashizume,
R. et al. Characterization of a
diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma cell line: implications for future
investigations and treatment. J
Neurooncol 110, 305-313,
doi:10.1007/s11060-012-0973-6 (2012).
[13] Sonoda,
Y. et al. Formation of intracranial
tumors by genetically modified human astrocytes defines four pathways critical
in the development of human anaplastic astrocytoma. Cancer research 61,
4956-4960 (2001).
[14] Bonner,
E. R., Waszak, S. M., Grotzer, M. A., Mueller, S. & Nazarian, J. Mechanisms
of imipridones in targeting mitochondrial metabolism in cancer cells. Neuro-oncology 23, 542-556, doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaa283 (2021).
[15] Ishida,
C. T. et al. Metabolic Reprogramming
by Dual AKT/ERK Inhibition through Imipridones Elicits Unique Vulnerabilities
in Glioblastoma. Clinical cancer research
: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 24, 5392-5406,
doi:10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-18-1040 (2018).
[16] Wagner,
J. et al. Preclinical evaluation of
the imipridone family, analogs of clinical stage anti-cancer small molecule
ONC201, reveals potent anti-cancer effects of ONC212. Cell Cycle 16,
1790-1799, doi:10.1080/15384101.2017.1325046 (2017).
[17] Vander
Heiden, M. G., Cantley, L. C. & Thompson, C. B. Understanding the Warburg
effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 324, 1029-1033,
doi:10.1126/science.1160809 (2009).
[18] Venneti,
S. & Thompson, C. B. Metabolic Reprogramming in Brain Tumors. Annual review of pathology 12, 515-545,
doi:10.1146/annurev-pathol-012615-044329 (2017).
[19] Stupp,
R. et al. Radiotherapy plus
concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. The New England journal of medicine 352, 987-996, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa043330 (2005).
[20] Weller,
M. et al. EANO guidelines on the
diagnosis and treatment of diffuse gliomas of adulthood. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, doi:10.1038/s41571-020-00447-z (2020).