Shanshan Shan1,2, Paul Liu1,2, David Waddington1,2, Bin Dong2, Mingyan Li3, Fangfang Tang3, Gary Liney2, Feng Liu3, Paul Keall1,2, and Brendan Whelan1
1ACRF Image X Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, 2Ingham Institute For Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia, 3School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Synopsis
MRI-Linac systems require high fidelity geometric
information to localize and track tumors during radiotherapy treatments. B0 field
inhomogeneity causes image distortions and can provide inaccurate tumor anatomy.
Here, we develop a high-order spherical harmonic method to correct for B0 inhomogeneity
induced geometric distortions. Experimental data acquired from a 1T open bore
MRI-Linac was used to validate the proposed method.
Introduction
MRI-Linac systems have been developed for
radiotherapy treatments to enable adaptive tracking and localization of tumors
[1]. The Australian 1T open bore MRI-Linac uses a split magnet with a 50 cm gap
to facilitate treatment beam delivery and patient positioning [2]. However, the
split bore configuration inevitably compromises B0 field homogeneity, which can
cause image distortions and potentially misplaced radiation doses [3]. Spherical
harmonic (SH) models can be used to characterize and correct geometric
distortions [4]. However, the split magnet design exhibits more complex B0
inhomogeneity field, which requires higher SH terms compared with conventional
MRI scanners. In this work, we develop a high-order SH model to correct B0
inhomogeneity induced distortions. A reverse gradient technique with a grid
phantom was used to measure image deformation and SH coefficients describing
the B0 field were iteratively calculated from measured phantom marker
positions. Evaluated using phantom data acquired
from Australian MRI-Linac scanner, a 10th order SH model reduces geometric
displacement to less than 2 mm.Methods
Due to gradient nonlinearity (GNL) and B0
inhomogeneity, the undistorted position L of an object can be found at location L+ with a positive encoding gradient
and at location L- with a negative encoding
gradient, governed by the equations [5] below: $$\begin{equation}\begin{aligned}&L^{+}=L+\frac{d B_{L}(x, y, z)}{G_{L}}+\frac{d B_{0}(x, y, z)}{G_{L}}\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;(1)\\&L^{-}=L+\frac{d B_{L}(x, y, z)}{G_{L}}-\frac{d B_{0}(x, y, z)}{G_{L}} \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;(2)\end{aligned}\end{equation}$$ where dBL and dB0 represent gradient and B0 field
perturbations, respectively. GL denotes the gradient strength
along L axis. The sign of spatial distortion $$$\frac{d B_{0}(x, y, z)}{G_{L}}$$$ caused by B0 field inhomogeneity
is affected by gradient polarity differences and thus B0 inhomogeneity
distortions can be extracted by averaging the displacements:$$\frac{L^{+}-L^{-}}{2}=\frac{d B_{0}(x, y, z)}{G_{L}}\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;(3) $$ The inhomogeneous B0 field over the whole field of
view (FOV) can be described by an SH model [6]:$$d B_{0}(L)=\sum_{n=0}^{N} \sum_{m=0}^{n} r^{n}(L) P_{n m}(\cos (\theta(L)))\left[A_{n m}^{k} \cos (m \emptyset(L))+B_{n m}^{k} \sin (m \emptyset(L))\right]\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;(4)$$ where N and m represent the order and degree of SH
models, respectively. $$$P_{n m}(\cdot)$$$ denotes the associated Legendre
function. $$$A_{n m}^{k}$$$ and $$$B_{n m}^{k}$$$ are unknown SH coefficients of
order N and degree m, which can be inversely calculated by the equation below:$$\underset{\left(A_{n m}^{k}, B_{n m}^{k}\right)}{\operatorname{argmin}}\left\|C\left\{L_{d i s}, (A_{n m}^{k},B_{n m}^{k})\right\}-L\right\|_{F}^{2} \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;(5)$$ Where Ldis represents the distorted position
caused only by B0 inhomogeneity which can be calculated by Eq. (3) and C{·} denotes the distortion-corrected
position using our previously developed GNL-encoding method [7] based on the SH
model. The Gauss-Newton (GN) [5]
iteration was used to solve the minimization problem.
A 3D grid phantom was scanned on the Australian 1T
MRI-Linac system with normal and reversed gradient encoding polarities to
measure B0 inhomogeneity distortion, as shown in Figure 1. To cover the imaging
area over a large diameter of spherical
volume (DSV), the phantom center was shifted by 10cm from scanner
isocenter along y direction. A total
of 3289 markers were extracted from this measurement dataset in a FOV of 20 cm
× 20 cm × 30 cm. These measured marker positions were used to inversely
calculate SH coefficients with various orders based on Eq. (5). The sequence
was turbo spin echo (TSE), image size = 130 × 110 × 192, resolution = 1.8 mm × 2 mm × 1.8 mm, TE/TR
= 15 ms/5.1 s, and pixel bandwidth = 202 Hz. To test the proposed method, another
testing phantom dataset was acquired with same imaging parameters, where
the phantom was shifted by 2cm along y direction from the previous scan.Results
As shown in Figure 2, markers close to isocenter
have distortion within 2mm, however at the edge area, displacement over 8mm is
presented, indicating that B0 inhomogeneity is exacerbated with the distance
from the isocenter. Figure 3 shows the root mean square deviation (RMSD) values
and maximal error using SH models with different model orders. The RMSD value
and maximum error change dramatically for orders from 5th to 8th and the difference
is subtle for orders over 10th. Phantom images from the testing dataset
acquired with both normal (a-c) and reversed gradient (d-f) polarities are shown
in Figure 4. After GNL distortion correction using our previously developed EM model
[7], residual distortions in Figure 4b and Figure 4e are only caused by B0
inhomogeneity. Geometric differences between Figure 4b and Figure 4e
demonstrate that B0 inhomogeneity induced distortions are affected by gradient
polarities. After applying the proposed method, distortions are almost
invisible in Figure 4c and Figure 4f. Quantitatively, the maximal displacement is
reduced from 12.2mm to 1.7mm on phantom images from the testing dataset before
and after correction.Discussion
The SH order determines the accuracy of the
proposed method, and a 10th order model was utilized based on the RMSD and maximal error analysis in this study. B0 inhomogeneity distortion is dependent
on sequence parameters [8] but can be predicted since the magnitude of distortion scales inversely with readout gradient strength, as shown in Eq.
(1-2).Conclusion
In this work, an SH model of up to 10th order is developed
for B0 distortion correction on a 1T open bore MRI-Linac. Phantom results show
that the geometric inaccuracy is within 2mm after correction, which will be
used to improve the accuracy of MRI-Linac treatments. Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the financial support of the NHMRC grant(grant No. 1132471) — The Australian MRI-Linac Program:Transforming the Science and Clinical Practice of Cancer Radiotherapy.
Brendan Whelan is supported by NHMRC CJ Martin fellowship. David Waddington and Paul Liu are supported by the Cancer Institute NSW.
References
[1]
Pollard JM, Wen Z, Sadagopan R, Wang J, Ibbott GS. The future of image-guided
radiotherapy will be MR guided. The
British journal of radiology. 2017;90(1073):20160667.
[2]
Keall PJ, Barton M, Crozier S. The Australian magnetic resonance imaging–linac
program. Paper presented at: Seminars in radiation oncology2014.
[3]
Baldwin LN, Wachowicz K, Fallone BG. A two‐step scheme for distortion
rectification of magnetic resonance images. Medical
physics. 2009;36(9Part1):3917-3926.
[4]
Acquaviva, R., Mangione, S. and Garbo, G., 2018. Image-based MRI gradient
estimation. Magnetic resonance imaging, 49, pp.138-144.
[5]
Baldwin, L.N., Wachowicz, K., Thomas, S.D., Rivest, R. and Fallone, B.G., 2007.
Characterization, prediction, and correction of geometric distortion in MR
images. Medical physics, 34(2), pp.388-399.
[6]
Tao S, Trzasko JD, Gunter JL, et al. Gradient nonlinearity calibration and
correction for a compact, asymmetric magnetic resonance imaging gradient
system. Phys Med Biol. 2017;62(2):N18-N31.
[7]
Shan, S., Liney, G. P., Tang, F., Li, M., Wang, Y., Ma, H., ... & Crozier,
S. (2020). Geometric distortion characterization and correction for the 1.0 T
Australian MRI‐linac system using an inverse electromagnetic
method. Medical physics, 47(3), 1126-1138.
[8]
Walker, A., Liney, G., Holloway, L., Dowling, J., Rivest‐Henault, D. and
Metcalfe, P., 2015. Continuous table acquisition MRI for radiotherapy treatment
planning: distortion assessment with a new extended 3D volumetric
phantom. Medical physics, 42(4), pp.1982-1991.