Geoffrey J. Topping1, Enio Barçi2, Jiying Cheng2, Sandra Sühnel1, Rainer Glass2, Roland E. Kälin2, and Franz Schilling1
1Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany, 2Neurosurgical Research, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
Synopsis
Mice with orthotopically implanted glioblastoma were imaged during
contrast injection, with the goals of establishing semi-quantitative DCE in
this model and to investigate the impact of apelin-controlled tumour angiogenesis.
Wild-type mice with control U87 tumours showed higher initial contrast
accumulation but also faster washout compared to apelin knockout mice implanted
with apelin knockdown tumour cells, consistent with apelin contributing to tumour
vascularization. Control and apelin knockout mice had low contrast accumulation
with genetically engineered human glioma-initiating cells.
Introduction
Vascular density
and function are important factors affecting the treatment response in glioblastoma
(GBM). DCE MRI is used to characterize GBM clinically, based mainly on contrast
enhancing or non-enhancing regions, the molecular causes of which are poorly
understood(1).
Expression of the
secretory peptide apelin is upregulated in tumor vessels and radially oriented
neoplastic cells in GBM(2). Knockdown of apelin (AKD) expression in
tumor cells decreases tumor vessel density in GBM mouse models. The combination of apelin-depleted AKD tumor
cells with loss-of-vascular apelin expression in apelin-knockout mice (APLNKO) leads
to synergistic anti-angiogenic effects and blocked pathological
vascularization(3,4).
U87 is a
patient-derived GBM cell line that demonstrates high vascular density and compact tumour growth, but does not fully reproduce clinical
pathology. Control (U87NSC) and apelin knockdown (U87AKD) lines are available(4). Genetically-engineered human
glioma-initiating cells (hGICs) produce less angiogenic
but invasive GBM(3).
The goals of this
study are to establish preclinical semi-quantitative DCE MRI biomarkers for
vascularity and vessel leakiness in orthotopic GBM models in mice, to
characterize the difference between U87 and hGIC tumours, and to investigate how
apelin deficient models differ from high apelin-expressing models.Methods
Tumor Models: Immune-deficient wild-type (WT) mice
were injected with 105 U87NSC (N=4) or hGIC cells (N=2), and APLNKO
mice were injected with 1x105 U87AKD (N=3) or hGIC cells (N=3), targeting
the right caudate putamen of the right brain hemisphere.
Hardware: Small animal 7T preclinical scanner
(Agilent/GE magnet, Bruker AVANCE III HD electronics), with RF coils (RAPID
Biomedical): either a volume resonator (72 mm ID) for RF transmission (Tx) and
a rigid surface receiver (Rx) coil array (20 mm diameter), or a volume
resonator (31 mm ID) for Rx/Tx.
Screening: T2w MRI to follow tumour development. Well-defined tumours, observed as
bright regions at the target location, were selected for DCE MRI.
DCE MRI: T1w 3D FLASH
images (TR 18.5 ms, FA 20°, 0.25x0.25x1 mm3 voxels, FOV 16x16 mm2,
1 s/frame, 360 frames) were acquired for 10 seconds before, during, and after
injection of 1 μmol/g body weight gadopentetate dimeglumine via tail vein
catheter.
DCE
Analysis: Voxel timecourses were first normalized to their pre-contrast signal
averages. Starting from onset of contrast signal changes, T0, semi-quantitative
parameters were calculated:
1. AUC120: Area Under
the Curve from T0 to T0 + 120 s.
2. Late slope: Linear
slope after the trend generally became linear and rapid changes had ceased.
Data were fit with an exponential + linear slope model: $$N(t)-1=A\left(1-e^{-Ct}\right)+St$$ where N(t) is the normalized signal at time t after T0, and A,
C, and S are fit parameters, with the A and C term (equalling 0 at t=0) fitting
rapid changes after contrast administration, and S being the late slope after
those rapid changes stabilize.
3. Initial
slope: Linear slope fit to data from T0 to T0 + 5 s.
Per-voxel maps of these parameters were averaged with ROIs drawn on
tumours, tumour periphery, and contralateral brain.Results
In T1w FLASH
images in Figure 1, U87 tumours showed strong contrast changes against
surrounding brain tissue after contrast agent administration, whereas hGIC tumours
showed very little contrast change.
Example
parametric maps are shown in Figure 2. Scatter plots of ROI average parameter
values are shown in Figure 3.
In AUC120 maps,
U87NSC tumours in WT mice had higher contrast uptake than U87AKD in APLNKO mice.
Both U87 tumour types had higher uptake than hGIC tumours in initial
post-contrast minutes. Uptake in hGIC tumours was slightly elevated compared to
contralateral brain, which was itself similar between mouse types.
In late slope
maps, U87NSC tumours, excluding a single small (~1 mm diameter) tumour, had a distinct
peripheral region with positive late slope with lower values in the tumour
centre, while most U87AKD tumours had a central region with further elevated late
slope. hGIC had no clear intra-tumoural heterogeneity.
In initial linear
slope maps, U87 tumours had similar patterns as in AUC120, while hGIC tumours
have low values. Initial slopes of hGIC in WT mice are slightly higher than
APLNKO mice, however.Discussion
Higher uptake
of contrast over 0-2 min in U87NSC/WT than U87AKD/APLNKO tumours and mice is
consistent with apelin deficient tumours having less developed vasculature.
Lower or negative late slope in U87NSC/WT tumours suggests washout is faster because
of high vessel density and more-functional vessels. A central positive late slope in
U87AKD/APLNKO tumours suggests lower vessel density of lower functionality,
allowing contrast to accumulate over longer periods i.e. outside of vessels.
The peripheral higher late slope in U87NSC/WT tumours might indicate ongoing
angiogenesis in the tumour rim.
Initial linear slope
is less reliable than other fits due to its sensitivity to manually determined
contrast arrival time T0. For high contrast uptake tumours, the
transition is usually clear, but for lower contrast uptake tumours, the scale
of signal change can be comparable to noise and thus unclear.Conclusions
Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI showed higher accumulation of contrast
agent between apelin rich (U87NSC/WT) than apelin deficient (U87AKD/APLNKO)
tumour models, in line with apelin-controlled tumour vascularization. Contrast
accumulation was also heterogeneous within and different between the models.
Area-under-the-curve may capture the overall vascularization of the tumours,
whereas late slope may reveal the level of functional vessels.Acknowledgements
We acknowledge support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG,
German Research Foundation – 391523415, SFB 824).References
1. Michael
Weller et al. (2021) EANO guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of diffuse
gliomas of adulthood. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 18: 170-186.
2.
Kälin RE et al. (2007) Paracrine and autocrine mechanisms of apelin signaling
govern embryonic and tumor angiogenesis. Dev Biol. 305(2): 599-614
3.
Giorgia Mastrella et al. (2019) Targeting APLN/APLNR Improves Antiangiogenic
Efficiency and Blunts Proinvasive Side Effects of VEGFA/VEGFR2 Blockade in
Glioblastoma. Cancer Research 79(9): 2298-2313
4. Anne Frisch et al. (2020) Apelin Controls Angiogenesis-Dependent
Glioblastoma Growth. Int J Mol Sci 21(11): 4179