Gregory J. Wheeler1, Quimby N. Lee2, Mary Kate Manhard3, Berkin Bilgic4, and Audrey P. Fan1,2
1Biomedical Engineering, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States, 2Neurology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States, 3Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, United States, 4Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
Synopsis
Vascular magnetic resonance fingerprinting
(vMRF) using both magnitude and phase information can achieve reasonable vascular
parameter maps of the brain without contrast agents. This approach combined with
a rapid, multi-echo pulse sequence enables dynamic vascular function mapping of
brain physiology. Here we begin to investigate the feasibility and tradeoffs of
performing vMRF with only 5 echoes and a temporal resolution of 5 seconds. Initial
findings indicate that reasonable fingerprint matching can be done with only 5
echoes and that the proposed sequence has adequate signal-to-noise ratio for reliable
results.
Introduction
Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) is an innovative MR acquisition
and reconstruction technique for quantitative multiparametric mapping.1 MRF utilizes biophysical simulations, in
parallel to image acquisition, making it adaptable to numerous parameters of
interest. Vascular MRF (vMRF) has leveraged this flexibility to enable simultaneous
mapping of cerebral blood volume (CBV), microvascular vessel radii (R), and
oxygen saturation (SO2).2 Maps are generated by matching
the signal time-course of each voxel to simulated signal time-courses generated
through biophysical simulations of microvascular brain vessels with known
magnetic susceptibilities.
Accurate vascular parameter map reconstruction with
vMRF is dependent on using a MR pulse sequence in imaging and simulations that
is sensitive to changes in blood oxygenation. Previous vMRF studies2,3
have used a gradient-echo sampling of free induction decay and echo (GESFIDE)
sequence and contrast agents to produce vMRF parameters maps. These methods
have relied solely on the signal magnitude of the images, but complex MRI
signals also includes oxygenation-dependent signal phase information that is not
typically exploited. The incorporation of phase information for contrast-free vMRF
reconstruction and a fast spin- and gradient-echo (SAGE) pulse sequence4,5
for acquisition could allow for mapping multiple vascular parameters every few
seconds rather than minutes, potentially enabling new investigations of dynamic
vascular function in the brain.Methods
Simulated signal dictionaries for vMRF were generated using the MRVox toolkit
in MATLAB.6 Complex signal time courses were generated for all
combinations of CBV (0-25%), R (2-25 μm), and SO2 (0-100%) containing 40
values each, resulting in dictionaries with 64,000 entries. Sequence parameters
identical to the GESFIDE and SAGE sequences were used to create a separate dictionary
for each sequence. Matching was performed by finding the simulated complex signal
that resulted in the highest inner product with each voxels’ complex signal evolution,
except in one comparison when coefficient-of-determination (R2) metric
was used to demonstrate difference between magnitude-only and complex-valued
matching (Figure 1B). In addition, all images underwent phase unwrapping and
background removal7,8 prior to fingerprint matching.
One mechanism by which temporal resolution for mapping
is increased by decreasing the number of echo times (TE) acquired. MRF utilizes
the signal evolution across multiple TE, therefore, the tradeoff between mapping
accuracy and TE train length was investigated through a retrospective
subsampling of a GESFIDE dataset. Initial GESFIDE images containing 40 TE was
subsampled to include just 20, 10, and 5 TE as shown in Figure 2A. The
subsampled imaging datasets were then matched to equivalently subsampled GESFIDE
dictionaries using vMRF to generate vascular maps.
With an increase in acquisition speed and
temporal resolution there can be an associated concern of a decrease in
signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). To examine whether the SNR achieved with the SAGE (5
TE, acq. time = 5.1s, voxel size = 2x2x5 mm3) sequence would be
adequate for vMRF, one subject was imaged, and signal averaging was performed
on 4, 16, and 64 consecutive repetitions of the sequence to achieve relative
SNR (rSNR) of 2, 4, and 8 respectively prior to fingerprint matching. These
higher rSNR images, in addition to a single image with no averaging, were matched
to the SAGE dictionary to produce vascular maps.
A second subject underwent imaging with the
SAGE sequence for 100 consecutive repetitions (~8.5 min). Each of these repetitions
was individually matched to the SAGE dictionary to produce vascular maps that could
be compared across time points in the duration of the imaging session.Results
The simulated non-contrast magnitude and phase signal changes
when altering CBV, R, or SO2 can be seen in Figure 1A. Representative
maps obtained when using just the magnitude of the signal for matching (R2)
show unphysiological results for CBV, compared to when using the complex signal
(inner product) for matching (Figure 1B). When subsampling TE in the GESFIDE
images (Figure 2A), CBV and R remain consistent, while SO2 appears
visually to increase slightly in predicted parameters, although still in a physiologically
feasible range (Figure 2B). For maps generated with signal-averaged images, there
are minimal observable differences, and the matching metric remains consistently
high for all rSNR levels (Figure 3). The three parameter maps also appear steady
over the course of the 8.5 minutes imaging session (Figure 4).Discussion and Conclusion
Figure 1A illustrates the similar changes in signal magnitude shapes
when increasing CBV or decreasing SO2. The phase evolution of those
changes is quite different, however, and may represent why the maps in Figure 1B
using this phase information may be able to better disentangle CBV and SO2.
MRF has been shown to be quite robust to noise, but when considering dynamic
MRF, the minimum SNR necessary to generate accurate maps is of critical
importance. The results here indicate that a single repetition of SAGE produces
similar maps to the higher rSNR images. This finding is relevant for dynamic mapping
as one SAGE repetition only takes 5.1 seconds, whereas if the 4, 16, or 64 averages
were necessary, each repetition would take ~20, 82, and 326 seconds
respectively, vastly affecting temporal resolution.
This study began investigating the feasibility of
performing accelerated vMRF without contrast agents. Upon further validation this
accelerated, contrast-free technique will allow us to investigate dynamic
changes in functional vascular biomarkers of disease.Acknowledgements
This study was supported by NIH R00-NS102884. The
project described was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational
Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through grant number UL1 TR001860 and
linked award TL1 TR001861.References
- Ma D, Gulani V,
Seiberlich N, et al. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Nature.
2013;495(7440):187-192. doi:10.1038/nature11971
-
Christen T, Pannetier
NA, Ni WW, et al. MR vascular fingerprinting: A new approach to compute
cerebral blood volume, mean vessel radius, and oxygenation maps in the human
brain. Neuroimage. 2014;89:262-270. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.052
-
Lemasson B, Pannetier
N, Coquery N, et al. MR Vascular Fingerprinting in Stroke and Brain Tumors
Models. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):37071. doi:10.1038/srep37071
-
Schmiedeskamp H, Straka
M, Newbould RD, et al. Combined spin- and gradient-echo perfusion-weighted
imaging: Spin- and Gradient-Echo PWI. Magn Reson Med. 2012;68(1):30-40.
doi:10.1002/mrm.23195
-
Manhard MK, Bilgic B,
Liao C, et al. Accelerated whole‐brain perfusion imaging
using a simultaneous multislice spin‐echo and gradient‐echo
sequence with joint virtual coil reconstruction. Magn Reson Med. Published
online May 8, 2019:mrm.27784. doi:10.1002/mrm.27784
-
Pannetier NA, Debacker
CS, Mauconduit F, Christen T, Barbier EL. A Simulation Tool for Dynamic
Contrast Enhanced MRI. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(3):e57636.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057636
-
Zhou D, Liu T,
Spincemaille P, Wang Y. Background field removal by solving the Laplacian
boundary value problem: Background Field Removal By Solving Laplacian Boundary
Value Problem. NMR Biomed. 2014;27(3):312-319. doi:10.1002/nbm.3064
-
Li W, Wu B, Liu C.
Quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain reflects spatial variation
in tissue composition. NeuroImage. 2011;55(4):1645-1656.
doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.088