Kai Luo1, Jie Chen1, Jinggang Zhang1, and Weiqiang Dou2
1Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, changzhou, China, 2MR Research China, GE Healthcare, Shanghai, China
Synopsis
The purpose was to
explore whether quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) can assess the
dynamic process of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury
(IRI) in rabbits. We found that the magnetic susceptibility values of the outer medulla
were statistically significant among the IRI group. Additionally, the magnetic
susceptibility values of the outer medulla was highly correlated with the
pathological score of renal injury. With these findings, QSM could serve as a
quantitative biomarker to assess the dynamic changes of the outer medulla in the early stage of renal IRI.
Introduction
Renal ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) often occurs in the process of
major cardiovascular surgery, renal transplantation, shock and severe trauma,
which is one of the main causes of acute renal injury and even renal failure[1]. Therefore, early diagnosis and treatment of renal
IRI has become the focus of clinical attention.
At present, biochemical and hematological tests are commonly used to
evaluate renal IRI, but those indicators cannot reflect unilateral renal
function and have a delaying effect. Renal biopsy is the gold standard for the
evaluation of renal injury, but its clinical application is limited by the
associated invasiveness and complications[2].
Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is a relatively novel
magnetic resonance imaging technique for quantitatively measuring tissue
magnetic susceptibility[3]. This technique has been widely used in the disease
diagnosis and treatment effect evaluation such as Neurodegenerative diseases, hepatic
iron overload, and prostate cancer et al[4, 5].
Therefore, the main goal of this study was to firstly explore if QSM has
potential in assessing the dynamic
process of renal IRI in rabbits and to secondly evaluate the relationship between the magnetic
susceptibility and the pathological score of renal injury.Methods
Animal model
In this animal care committee–approved study, thirty-six rabbits were
divided into the IRI group(n=30) and the sham group(n=6). In the IRI group,
rabbits underwent the left kidney surgery by clamping the left renal artery and
vein for 60 minutes and then releasing the clamp to establish renal IRI model. In the sham group, rabbits underwent the same
operation, but without clamping the left renal artery and vein.
MRI experiment
MRI experiments were performed five times (IRI-pre, IRI-1h, IRI-12h,
IRI-24h and IRI-48h) for all rabbits on an 3.0-Telsa MR (750w, GE Healthcare,
USA) with a sixteen-channel phase array body coil employed. Multi-echo fast-gradient-echo
sequence was used to acquire QSM imaging. The corresponding scan parameters
were of field-of-view = 15cm×12cm, matrix size =448×176, repetition time (TR)= 36.7ms,
echo of time (TE): 4.4ms/ 9.2ms/ 14.1ms/ 18.9ms/ 23.8ms/ 28.6ms, flip angle = 10°.
The scan time was 23 seconds.
Data analysis
All data were analyzed with a vendor-provided QSM fitting software on
ADW 4.6 workstation (GE Healthcare). Dynamic Renal the magnetic
susceptibility values were measured in the outer medulla at five time points. In
addition, all specimens of left kidneys were stained
with hematoxylin-eosin (HE).
The
pathological score of renal injury were calculated[6].
All statistical analyses were performed in SPSS software. The
repeated measurement analysis of variance was used to compare the differences in the
magnetic susceptibility among IRI group at different
time points and sham group. Differences in the pathological score
of renal injury were
analyzed by the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test. Spearman correlation analysis was used to
evaluate the relationship between the magnetic susceptibility of outer
medulla and the
pathological score of renal injury in the
IRI group. Significance threshold was
set as P<0.05.Results
In IRI group, the magnetic susceptibility values of the outer
medulla at IRI-pre、IRI-1h、IRI-12h、IRI-24h, and
IRI-48h time
points were (43.23 ± 3.06)×10-3ppm, (﹣5.78 ± 1.82)×10-3ppm, (6.87 ± 3.85)×10-3ppm,
(10.56 ± 2.28)×10-3ppm, (19.93 ± 2.18)×10-3ppm,
respectively, and
showed significant differences between each two of different time points (P<0.05;Fig.1). In comparison, for the sham
group, comparable magnetic susceptibility values of the outer medulla were
revealed between each two of different time points (P>0.05).
In the IRI
group, the magnetic susceptibility values of the outer medulla had negative correlation with the scores
of cell edema (r=﹣0.70, P<0.05), and showed positive
correlation with the scores of necrocytosis, interstitial inflammation, cast
and the total pathological score of
renal injury (r=0.71,
0.60, 0.76, 0.53, P<0.05, respectively).Discussion
This study investigated
the dynamic relationship between the magnetic susceptibility values of the outer medulla and
the early pathological characteristics of renal IRI. The results demonstrated
that the magnetic
susceptibility values could reflect the dynamic changes of renal IRI. The magnetic
susceptibility values of the renal outer medulla decreased decreased at 1 hour after IRI and decreased
from 1 to 48 hours. The magnetic susceptibility values of the renal outer medulla
was positive correlated with the
scores of necrocytosis, interstitial inflammation, cast and the total pathological score of
renal injury, and negative correlated with the scores of cell
edema.Conclusion
QSM has been demonstrated to assess
the dynamic changes of the outer medulla in the early stage of renal IRI of rabbits, and might
thus be used as an effective method to evaluate the early stage of renal IRI.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Munshi R, Hsu C, Himmelfarb J.
Advances in understanding ischemic acute kidney injury [J]. BMC Med, 2011, 9: 11.
[2] Basile D P, Anderson
M D, Sutton T A. Pathophysiology of acute kidney injury [J]. Compr Physiol,
2012, 2(2): 1303-53.
[3] Deistung A, Schweser
F, Reichenbach J R. Overview of quantitative susceptibility mapping [J]. NMR
Biomed, 2017, 30(4): e3569.
[4] Liu C, Li W, Tong K
A, et al. Susceptibility-weighted imaging and quantitative susceptibility
mapping in the brain [J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2015, 42(1): 23-41.
[5] Wang Y, Liu T.
Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM): Decoding MRI data for a tissue
magnetic biomarker [J]. Magn Reson Med, 2015, 73(1): 82-101.
[6] de Carvalho A L, Vital
R B, Kakuda C M, et al. Dexmedetomidine on renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in
rats: assessment by means of NGAL and histology [J]. Ren Fail, 2015, 37(3):
526-30.