S Senthil Kumaran1, A Ankeeta1, Himanshu Singh1, and Nisha Chauhan1
1Department of NMR and MRI Facility, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Synopsis
The effects of
cumulative lifetime noise exposure on ascending auditory pathway function in audio metrically normal individuals is explored by sustained and transient fMRI
responses and related auditory brainstem response (ABR). The experiment included continuous (scanner noise) and deviant noise (additional pink noise)
levels that affected mental workload and auditory/visual attention. Our results exhibited reduced attention and
mental workload in central auditory regions in people exposed to higher noise (>85dBA)
in comparison with those exposed to lesser noise (<85dBA).
Introduction
Chronic noise
exposure induces cognitive impairment and oxidative stress in the brain1.
Impact of noise on cognitive function has been the subject of much debate,
considering road rage or aggressive behaviour in certain individuals exposed to
noise. Lower sound-level tolerance resulted in a higher sustained fMRI response
in the inferior colliculus (IC) and medial geniculate body (MGB) in response to
continuous broadband noise, ascribed to central gain augmentation2. It is well established that subcortical regions
(such as the IC) respond to continuous sounds with a sustained fMRI response3, whereas the main auditory
cortex response is yet to be explored. By inducing continuous (scanner noise) and deviant noise (additional pink noise) we studied their effects on mental workload and
auditory/visual attention using fMRI and auditory brainstem response (ABR) in
healthy population.Method
Study was conducted on 52 healthy subjects (13
Females & 39 Males, mean age 29.13±7.43 years), categorized into three
groups i.e., Low (<60dB), Medium (65-85dB) and High (>85dB) noise
exposure groups (all had exposure up to 10hrs/day).
Data
acquisition: MR imaging
(3D T1) and post task rsfMRI studies were carried out on a 3 T MR scanner (Ingenia 3.0T TX, M/s. Philips Medical Systems) using a 32
channel head coil. The BOLD
imaging was carried out using single shot echo planar imaging sequence with 35 slices of
4.0 mm thickness, flip angle = 90°,
transverse orientation, fold-over direction: AP, field of view = 230 mm with TR/TE = 2000/30 ms, number of dynamics = 205.
Data
analysis:
Structural (T1) data was processed with the CAT12
toolbox within SPM12 (version CAT12.6) to extract surface based cortical
thickness (CT) and gyrification index (GI) estimates. Resting state
functional connectivity was evaluated using the CONN toolbox (Ver. 19) with
ROI-to-ROI analysis using the General Linear Model and correlation4.
Results are presented with Holm-Bonferroni
correction and at p<0.05, FDR corrected.Result
Gyrification indices and total intracranial volume revealed
significant differences between high
noise exposed group (HNEG) and medium noise exposed group
(MNEG), but there was no difference between MNEG and low noise exposed groups
(LNEG) (Figure 1, Table 1). A widespread increase in gray matter volume (GMV) was observed in various areas of brain in HNEG
as compared to MNEG
and LNEG (Figure 2).
Increased GMV in frontal, temporal, parietal and occipital regions was evident
in high noise exposed group. Significant differences in MNEG as compared to LNEG was observed in bilateral speech and
language areas (Figure 3).
The ROI analysis in HNEG
exhibited increased functional connectivity between the right lateral
pre-frontal cortex (LPFC) of the fronto-parietal (FP)
network and bilateral supramarginal gyrus nodes of the substantia nigra (SN), and
decreased FC between the medial pre-frontal
cortex (MPFC) and the left lateral parietal (LP) node of the default mode network (DMN) (Figure 4). Bivariate
correlations between right LPFC and bilateral attentional network were observed
in HNEG with respect to LNEG. When comparing MNEG with LNEG, both revealed increased
connectivity of the SN left anterior insula (AI) with all four FP network
nodes, with a shared connectivity of right LPFC and PPC nodes with the left
anterior insular region.Discussion
Noise has an
effect on cognitive function and brain signals3. When people are
exposed to different degrees of noise, their mental effort, visual/auditory
attention, and the relative power of the frequency bands all follow a similar
pattern3. We explored the anatomical and functional changes in the
brain of people who have had high, medium or low levels of noise exposure. An
ROI-to-ROI analysis of the noise-exposed network based on post-fMRI task brain mapping
demonstrated intact connectivity throughout the brain and no atrophy-related
changes in the three groups. On intergroup comparison, the results revealed a
discriminating connectivity in between the three groups, which included the
hearing, speech, and attention networks. When compared to the LNEG, high noise exposure resulted in
increased connectivity and gray matter areas in the auditory, language,
attention networks, salience networks, and frontoparietal network (cognitive
control). In comparison to the LNEG, the default mode network showed strong intrinsic
connectivity in the MNEG. The bilateral supplementary motor area and left insula were
similar to all three groups, according to a multimodal assessment of the
spatial overlap of the structural and two functional outcomes. Auditory
perception and discrimination accuracy were found to be significantly different
in the HNEG compared to the LNEG in neural and behavioral investigations, implying
that the high exposed group had supra-normal capacity to execute in higher
order auditory attention tasks5. The medial geniculate body's dorsal
area and the auditory cortex's association area are critical for maintaining
and directing auditory attention. In a complex multisource auditory scene, the
process of selectively directing attention to a single auditory stream may
actually affect our perceptual structure of the scene's features. Overall,
differentiating foreground from background and extracting signal from noise is
likely to be a multi-stage process including bottom-up gestalt grouping
primitives, auditory memory, attention, and other forms of top-down control6. Conclusion
The results
showed individuals exposed to high noise (at a level of <85 dBA)
exhibited reduced mental
workload and visual/auditory attention, revealing the effects of noise exposure
on cognitive performance.Acknowledgements
The funding from Life Sciences Research Board (LSRB), Ministry of Defence, Government of India is duly acknowledged (vide grant No. LSRB-295/PEE&BS/2017)References
1. Jafari,
M. J., Khosrowabadi, R., Khodakarim, S., & Mohammadian, F. (2019). The
Effect of Noise Exposure on Cognitive Performance and Brain Activity
Patterns. Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences, 7,
2924–2931.
2. Gu,
J. W., Halpin, C. F., Nam, E. C., Levine, R. A., & Melcher, J. R. (2010).
Tinnitus, diminished sound-level tolerance, and elevated auditory activity in
humans with clinically normal hearing sensitivity. Journal of neurophysiology,
104, 3361–3370.
3. Dewey,
R. S., Francis, S. T., Guest, H., Prendergast, G., Millman, R. E., Plack, C.
J., & Hall, D. A. (2020). The association between subcortical and cortical
fMRI and lifetime noise exposure in listeners with normal hearing thresholds.
NeuroImage, 204, 116239.
4. Whitfield-Gabrieli
S, Nieto-Castanon A. (2012) Conn: a functional connectivity toolbox for
correlated and anticorrelated brain networks. Brain Connect., 2:125-41.
5. Dommes,
E., Bauknecht, H. C., Scholz, G., Rothemund, Y., Hensel, J., & Klingebiel,
R. (2009). Auditory cortex stimulation by low-frequency tones-An fMRI study.
Brain Research, 1304, 129-137.
6. Hommel,
B., Fischer, R., Colzato, L. S., Van Den Wildenberg, W. P., & Cellini, C.
(2012). The effect of fMRI (noise) on cognitive control. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 290.