Alexandra Grace Roberts1, Pascal Spincemaille2, Thanh Nguyen2, and Yi Wang2,3
1Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States, 2Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States, 3Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States
Synopsis
Morphology Enabled Dipole Inversion
(MEDI) is an iterative reconstruction algorithm for Quantitative Susceptibility
Mapping (QSM) that is effective in suppressing streaking artifacts by
exploiting the magnitude image as a morphological prior. However, contiguous
areas of dipole-incompatibility (such as noise) induce shadow
artifacts whose spatial frequency components are not sufficiently regularized
by the gradient based regularization in MEDI.
Regularizing these spatially connected regions reduces shadow artifacts
in Morphology Enabled Dipole Inversion based Quantitative Susceptibility
Mapping reconstructions.
Introduction
Quantitative
Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) is an MRI contrast mapping the magnetic
susceptibility of tissue in vivo from gradient echo measurements. The inverse
problem in QSM is ill-posed requiring the use of regularization. Bayesian inference approaches such as
Morphology Enabled Dipole Inversion (MEDI) use an edge-weighted gradient under
an L1 norm to penalize the streaking artifacts arising from dipole-incompatible
sources (such as noise) in the phase of the gradient echo data [1],
[2]. However, contiguous areas of dipole-incompatibility may exist in
the phase such as low signal regions in bone or air and residual background
field whose source is outside the region of interest. These induce shadow
artifacts that are insufficiently suppressed by this regularization.
Exploiting the spherical mean value (SMV) property of the harmonic background
field [3] and including it in the dipole kernel (MEDI-SMV) suppresses many of
these artifacts at the cost of an eroded brain mask. A downsampled edge-weighted gradient under an L1 norm suppresses shadow artifacts at
the cost of reduced regions of interest (ROI) susceptibilities [4]. Imposing
an L2 norm term to minimize variation within cerebral spinal fluid reduces some shadow artifacts, termed MEDI+0 [5].
The phase error map obtained
during the nonlinear multi-echo field fitting in this study locates
sources of dipole-incompatibilities that may generate shadow artifacts. The
reduction of shadow artifacts via an L2 norm minimizing variation within contiguous
regions in the phase error map is demonstrated in this work.Methods
The cost
function in MEDI+0 is:
$$\chi(\textbf{r})= \mathrm{argmin}_\chi {\lVert w(e^{ib}-e^{id*\chi}) \rVert}_2^2+\lambda_1{\lVert M \nabla\chi \rVert}_1+\lambda_2{\lVert M_{CSF}(\chi-\bar{\chi}_{CSF}) \rVert}_2^2 \tag{1}$$
where $$$b$$$ is the relative
difference field, $$$d$$$ the dipole kernel, $$$\chi$$$ the susceptibility, $$$w$$$ the noise weighting
matrix, $$$M$$$ the morphological weighting
matrix, $$$\nabla$$$ the gradient operator, $$$M_{CSF}$$$ the CSF mask and $$$\bar{\chi}_{CSF}$$$ the mean susceptibility
within such mask.
By considering that shadow originating from larger dipole-incompatible sources can be viewed as streaking artifacts of those same sources
in a lower resolution image, MEDI-d proposed:
$$\chi(\textbf{r})= \mathrm{argmin}_\chi {\lVert w(e^{ib}-e^{id*\chi})
\rVert}_2^2+\lambda_1{\lVert M \nabla\chi \rVert}_1+\lambda_2{\lVert M_{D} D \nabla \chi \rVert}_1 \tag{2}$$
where $$$D$$$ is a downsampling operator and $$$M_D$$$ is the edge mask derived from the downsampled
image $$$Dm$$$ with the sum of squares across echoes of the
gradient echo signal using the same method in which $$$M$$$ was derived from. The downsampling term is retained
in MEDI-FM, which is defined as:
$$\chi(\textbf{r})= \mathrm{argmin}_\chi {\lVert w(e^{ib}-e^{id*\chi})
\rVert}_2^2+\lambda_1{\lVert M \nabla\chi \rVert}_1+\lambda_2{\lVert
M_{CSF}(\chi-\bar{\chi}_{CSF}) \rVert}_2^2+\lambda_3{\lVert M_{S}M_{D} D \nabla \chi \rVert}_1+\sum^{n_{FM}}_j {\lVert M_j(\chi-\bar{\chi}_j) \rVert}_2^2 \tag{3}$$
$$$\chi_{j}$$$ is the mean susceptibility within masks
$$$M_{j}$$$, which are obtained as follows. The local field error
map $$$E_{f}$$$ obtained during multi-echo
complex field fitting is smoothed using a Gaussian kernel
$$$\sigma = 3 \cdot \mathrm{min}(voxel \: size)$$$ obtaining
$$$E_{f}^S$$$. Two masks
$$$M_f$$$ and $$$M_{f}^S$$$ are obtained by retaining those
voxels with intensity larger than half of the mean signal of a 3D patch around that
voxel for
$$$E_{f}$$$ and $$$E_{f}^S$$$, respectively. The connected components in $$$M_{f}^S$$$ are multiplied with $$$M_{f}$$$ to obtain the masks
$$$M_{j}$$$. The additional downsampling mask
$$$M_{S}$$$ is obtained by inverting $$$M_{f}$$$, followed by
erosion.
Seven patients (six healthy volunteers and one hemorrhage patient) were scanned at 3T (GE Healthcare) using a 3D
multi-echo spoiled gradient echo sequence. Acquisition parameters were
FOV = 24
cm, partial FOV factor = 0.8, acquisition matrix size = 384 × 384 × 64,
flip
angle = 20°, slice thickness = 2 mm, TR = 52 msec, number of echoes =
11, first
TE = 4.1 msec, echo spacing = 4.4 msec, parallel imaging factor 2, scan
time of
~8 minutes. Regularization
parameters were $$$\lambda_1 = 1000$$$, $$$\lambda_2 = 200 $$$, and
$$$\lambda_3 = 250 $$$ and $$$\lambda_4 = 15$$$ was selected
to balance ROI susceptibility and
shadow reduction in healthy subject reconstructions. The downsampling parameter $$$\lambda_3$$$ was set to 0 for the first 2 iterations of the
Gauss-Newton solver used for minimizing Equation 2 and halved for each iteration
after iteration 3. The hemorrhage reconstruction used $$$\lambda_1 = 1000$$$, $$$\lambda_2 = 200
$$$, $$$\lambda_3 = 1000$$$, and $$$\lambda_4 = 5$$$ for all
iterations, with $$$M_{S}$$$ set to the identity matrix $$$I$$$.Results
Enforcing similar susceptibility
distributions within the masks displayed in Figure 1 reduces shadow artifacts in healthy
subjects (Figure 2, 4) while preserving ROI susceptibilities (Figure 3). The
ROIs evaluated are the
left and right globus pallidus (GP), putamen (PU), caudate nucleus (CN), red nucleus
(RN), dentate nucleus (DN), and the substantia nigra (SN). MEDI-FM also reduces shadow artifacts surrounding the hemorrhage in the hemorrhage case (Figure 5).Discussion
Contiguous
dipole-incompatible points with abrupt changes in susceptibility
and low signal to noise ratio (SNR) are captured in the local field error map. Regularizing these regions reduces shadow artifacts. Future work involves separation of the sagittal sinus vein and the edge of the brain in $$$M_{j=1}$$$ and automatic
parameter tuning to allow each component of the error map to weight
the cost function by error magnitude.Conclusion
Shadow
artifacts are reduced by MEDI-FM, which regularizes susceptibility distribution
in regions with high phase noise as measured by the local field error map.
MEDI-FM reduces shadow artifacts in both healthy subjects and hemorrhage cases,
requiring no brain erosion and preserving ROI susceptibilities.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] J. Liu et al., “Morphology enabled dipole inversion for
quantitative susceptibility mapping using structural consistency between the
magnitude image and the susceptibility map,” Neuroimage, vol. 59, no. 3,
pp. 2560–2568, 2012.
[2] Y. Kee et al., “Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM)
algorithms: Mathematical rationale and computational implementations,” IEEE
Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 2531–2545, 2017.
[3] Y. Wen,
D. Zhou, T. Liu, P. Spincemaille, and Y. Wang, “An iterative spherical mean
value method for background field removal in MRI: Robust Background Field
Removal Using iSMV,” Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 1065–1071,
2014.
[4] A. Roberts, P. Spincemaille, T. Nguyen, and Y. Wang, “MEDI-d: Downsampled
Morphological Priors for Shadow Reduction in Quantitative Susceptibility
Mapping,” International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2021.
[5] Z. Liu,
P. Spincemaille, Y. Yao, Y. Zhang, and Y. Wang, “MEDI+0: Morphology enabled
dipole inversion with automatic uniform cerebrospinal fluid zero reference for
quantitative susceptibility mapping,” Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 79, no. 5,
pp. 2795–2803, 2018.