Zakia Gironda1, Mihály Vöröslakos2, Youssef Wadghiri3, Omid Yaghmazadeh4, and Leeor Alon3
1Radiology, NYU School of Medicine, NEW YORK, NY, United States, 2Neuroscience Institute, NYU School of Medicine, New york, NY, United States, 3NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States, 4Neuroscience Institute, NYU School of Medicine, NEW YORK, NY, United States
Synopsis
Despite their costly nature, the inexactitude of design in off-the-shelf
MRI animal holders translates to a fastidious setup, iso-center misalignment,
and incorrect animal body positioning. Our open-source 3D-print design provides
precise iso-center alignment and minimizes motion artifact using its various
head fixing mechanisms. It ensures comfortable positioning for rats and mice during
in-vivo anesthetized and awake animal scan acquisition. The modular holder
parts enable the same design to be used with other imaging modalities with
minimal intervention. The design is low cost, ensures reproducibility and time
efficiency of setup.
Introduction:
Efficient solutions for animal conditioning
suitable for well-controlled and repetitive MRI experimentation are limited in
number, costly and most of the time lack flexibility. With recent advances,
affordable 3D printers have expanded the capability of the research community
to design, prototype, and apply parts and systems that best suit their
experiments1,2. Here, we introduce an open-source modular 3D-printable
rodent conditioning fixture with a precise and adjustable head-fixing system
for anesthetized and awake rodents. Method/results:
The
proposed holder was designed using Fusion 3603. Small
parts are made with resin-based printer (Form2, Formlabs) to achieve desired
resolution. Larger parts were printed using Tough PLA material (Replicator-Z18,
MakerBot).
Our holder accommodates
both anesthetized and awake rodents. Its base has an embedded ear-bar guiding
mechanism for head-fixation of anesthetized mice and rats. The ear-bar system
enables the user to achieve a fixed, precise, and repeatable head positioning
while continuously delivering anesthetic agent. The adjustable bed platform enables proper body
positioning and physiological comfort to the mouse. The base
can also host a pair of removable stands for head fixation of awake mice. These
stands can support matching fixtures formerly attached to animals’ skulls in a
stereotaxic surgery. The holder design along with our extensive experience in
training and employing head-fixed mice in neuroscientific experiments4 allows us
to image awake animals. The flexible positioning of the isoflurane delivery
mechanism, alongside with an interchangeable tooth bar sub-system, allows the
utilization of the same setup for both mouse and rat with minimal intervention.
The tooth-bar stand can be extended by an add-on that permits attachment of
customizable holders for experiments requiring fiber optics, cables, etc. In
awake mice experiments the nose-cone system can also be used for odor
stimulation. Other add-on parts include a mouse bed platform, and heating
covers.
The base of
the holder can be attached to various imaging modalities (e.g. MRI, CT, etc)
with minor adjustments. In addition, the awake mice head-fixation system can be
used in several neuroscientific experiments such as calcium imaging. These
characteristics facilitate the design and execution of multi-modal
investigations.
Tapping 3D-printed plastic materials often comprises the quality
of screw connections and can wear off in a short time. To avoid such quality
issues and their dependency on printing technology, a tap-free approach was
applied to assemble different parts of the system using nylon nuts (fixed to
the 3D printed parts by UV cured superglue, Loctite) to secure the screws.
For mouse imaging in both anesthetized and awake subjects, a birdcage
RF-coil (ID=86-mm) was used in transmit-only for the excitation pulse and a
single receive-only loop surface coil (ID=10mm) for the signal acquisition. A T2-weighted RARE sequence
was used in both cases to test the stability of the setup using the following
pulse parameters: TR=2500-ms, TE=33-ms, Turbo-factor=8, FOV=20-mm x 20-mm,
Matrix size=256 x 256 resulting into 78-µm x 78-µm in-plane resolution with a
total of 19 slices of 800-µm thickness. Scans were repeated over 10 times
resulting into an imaging time of 13-min. While repetitions were averaged
online in anesthetized mice, individual repetitions were acquired separately
for the awake mouse. The corresponding image sets were subsequently realigned retrospectively
using ImageJ (NIH) prior to averaging to account for erratic motions of the
awake mouse. For anesthetized rat
imaging, the birdcage volume coil (ID=86mm) was used in Tx/Rx to acquire the
same RARE sequence under identical parameters and imaging time as in mouse
experiments but with a FOV = 35-mm x 35-mm resulting into 137-µm x 137-µm
in-plane resolution
We performed preliminary
experiments on brain imaging of both mice and rats to examine our 3D printed
design. Figure 2.A illustrates the experimental setup for anesthetized mice. Vitals
sign were monitored via a rectal probe for body temperature and an air cushion
located underneath the abdomen to monitor pressure variations during
respiration. The body temperature was controlled via a water-circulating heating
cover on top of the mouse. Figure 2.B and C illustrate example T2 scans of two
anesthetized mice with minimal adjustments in between, confirming the
repeatability of scanning using our platform. Figure 3.A depicts the identical
setup but this time configured for awake animal scanning. The awake animal,
formerly trained for head-fixation, is placed on the base while its head is
secured with a skull fixture coupled to matching pieces embedded in the holder.
Side structures surrounding the animal help reduce its stress. Figure 3.B depicts
the ability of this setup to perform motion-artifact-free MR imaging in awake
mice.
Figure 4.A shows a separate copy of the holder dedicated to experiments
involving anesthetized rats. A formerly anesthetized rat was accommodated into
the set-up in a similar way as for the mouse. A sample MR scan is illustrated
in Figure 4.B.
Discussions/Conclusions:
Our open-source modular design is easy-to-assemble, easy-to-use,
and compatible with various animal MRI experiments. It can also be adapted to
other imaging and recording modalities. Our preliminary experiments demonstrate
the effectiveness of the set-up in awake and anesthetized animal conditioning
for different image acquisition.
Provided with open-source
CAD design files5, our system is easy-to-modify and low-cost to build
and can be tailored to the researcher’s need.Acknowledgements
“This
work was supported, in part, by NSF-DMREF under Award Number DMR 1728858 and
was also performed at the NYU Langone Health Preclinical Imaging Laboratory, a
shared resource partially supported by the NIH/SIG 1S10OD018337-01, the Laura
and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center Support Grant NIH/NCI P30CA016087 and the
NIBIB Biomedical Technology Resource Center Grant NIH P41 EB017183”.References
[1] Fan et al., “Progressive 3D Printing Technology and Its Application in
Medical Materials”,
Fron. In Pharma., 2020, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00122
[2] Vöröslakos et al., “Metal Microdrive and Head Cap
System for Silicon Probe Recovery in Freely Moving Rodent.” ELife, 2021,
elifesciences.org/articles/65859.
[3] https://www.autodesk.com/products/fusion-360/overview
[4] English et al., “Pyramidal Cell-Interneuron Circuit Architecture and
Dynamics in Hippocampal Networks”, Neuron, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.09.033
[5] https://github.com/zbenyouss/Modular-3D-printed-Platform-For-In-vivo-MRI