Zoona Javed1,2, Gary Martinez3, AnaPaula Candiota1,4,5, Miquel Cabanas2,4, and Silvia Lope2,4
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain, 2Servei de Ressonància Magnètica Nuclear, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain, 3Department of Imaging Physics, University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States, 4Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN),, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain, 5Institut de Biotecnologia i de Biomedicina (IBB), Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
Synopsis
This work describes
an improved multi-voxel Chemical shift imaging (CSI) pulse sequence that uses the
semi-LASER localization approach. Bruker CSI sequence containing PRESS
localization block (CSI-PRESS) was modified by replacing the aforementioned PRESS
block with a semi-LASER one resulting in a CSI-semi-LASER sequence. This work
was developed on a 7T Bruker BioSpec 70/30 USR spectrometer running ParaVision
5.1 which does not contain neither built-in blocks for semi-LASER sequence nor
adiabatic pulses. The sequence was tested in wt C57/BL6 mouse brain and
compared with the stock CSI-PRESS sequence. The results show improved
homogeneity and reduction in chemical shift displacement error (CSDE).
INTRODUCTION
Proton
(1H) Chemical Shift Imaging (CSI) is a versatile diagnostic technique that
provides non-invasive metabolic information about living tissues. Our group has
a long track of using CSI-based nosological images to provide metabolomic
information for treatment monitoring in murine brain tumors [1]. However, tumor
inhomogeneities and the small mouse brain volume may compromise spectrum
quality when using the Bruker commercially available PRESS-CSI sequences. The
semi-LASER sequence is a robust localization technique for 1H-MRS and can be
used as an alternative to PRESS sequence for single voxel localization [2]. In
the semi-LASER sequence, the single voxel localization is achieved by using two
pairs of adiabatic full passage (AFP) hyperbolic secant refocusing pulses
instead of the two 180o refocusing pulses for PRESS. For the same
amount of volume excitation, the adiabatic refocusing pulses perform uniform
refocusing of the spins producing a larger net magnetization vector [3]. The
semi-LASER sequence was implemented in-house in a 7T Bruker BioSpec 70/30 USR
using ParaVision 5.1 for single voxel and multivoxel spectroscopy. Our goal was
to increase signal to noise ratio (SNR) for the acquired spectra, which may
allow us to increase the spatial resolution, as well as to have better spatial
distribution homogeneity in order to improve pattern spectral classification in
our murine brain tumor models.METHODS
All experiments
were performed on a 7T Bruker Biospec 70/30 USR preclinical scanner using
ParaVision 5.1 (Bruker BioSpin GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany) equipped with a
mini-imaging gradient set (400 mT/m). For mouse brain in vivo studies, a 72-mm inner diameter linear volume coil was used as
transmitter and a dedicated mouse brain surface coil as receiver.
For the
implementation of the semi-LASER sequence, the PRESS localization block was
replaced by a semi-LASER localization block (Figure 1). For excitation, 90o
Hermite pulses were used in both PRESS and semi-LASER sequences. For
refocusing, 180o adiabatic full passage Hyperbolic secant pulses
were used in the semi-LASER block instead of the conventional Hermite pulses.
The spin echo condition was maintained if
Ƭ1+Ƭ3+Ƭ5 = Ƭ2+Ƭ4, with time delays defined in Figure 1. In our
implementation, we kept the intervals Ƭ2=
Ƭ3 for all values of TE, hence the spin echo condition was satisfied when Ƭ5=Ƭ4-Ƭ1. A pair of crusher gradients
were also positioned symmetrically around AFP pulses in order to suppress
unwanted signals.
The 180o
refocusing adiabatic pulses were generated using the TopSpin stdisp tool. In
PRESS, the excitation pulse bandwidth (BW) = 9 kHz, pulse length = 600 µs,
flip angle = 90o and refocusing pulse bandwidth (BW) = 5.7 kHz,
pulse length = 600µs and flip angle = 180o. In the semi-LASER sequence, the excitation
pulse is the same as PRESS. The two pairs of refocusing pulses have bandwidth
(BW) = 9 kHz, pulse length = 2000 µs and flip angle = 180o.
The CSI-semi-LASER pulse sequence was
implemented likewise but incorporating stepped phase-encoding gradients along 2
axes, as shown in figure 2.RESULTS
Figure
3 shows the comparison of single voxel PRESS versus semi-LASER acquisitions in
a wt C57/BL6 mouse brain. Water was sufficiently suppressed in both sequences
using a VAPOR water suppression block, and both sequences provided accurately
localized spectra. Semi-LASER spectra showed a 1.6-fold SNR increase compared
to PRESS. CSI-semi-LASER was also successfully implemented and a mouse brain
study (figure 4). CSI grids overlaid on T2-weighted mouse brain MRI for PRESS
and semi-LASER are shown in panels A and B respectively and insets show
representative spectra from the same location. A SNR increase of 9.9% with
respect to PRESS CSI was observed. A reduced chemical shift displacement error (CSDE) is obtained in CSI semi-LASER. For the NAA peak at 2.0 ppm, the CSDE was
calculated in the x, y and z directions and values found were 9%, 8.9% and 8.9%
for the CSI-semi-LASER and 9%, 14.2% and 14.2% for CSI-PRESS. Moreover, the
CSI-semi-LASER showed a more spatially homogenous profile when compared to the
CSI-PRESS sequence as it can be seen in the NAA metabolic maps (Figure 4).DISCUSSION
Single
voxel and CSI-semi-LASER sequences were successfully implemented at 7T for
ParaVision 5.1. The implemented CSI-semi-LASER sequence provided superior
quality spectra when compared to the conventional CSI-PRESS sequence, as a
result of the better excitation profile of the adiabatic refocusing pulses and the
reduction in chemical shift displacement errors. With sharp selection profiles
and a small CSDE, voxels closer to the edge of the VOI will be suitable
evaluation, which is not the current situation. Furthermore, the relative
insensitivity to B1 inhomogeneities offered by the adiabatic refocusing pulses
is an additional advantage when using the semi-LASER technique as a substitute
to the conventional CSI-PRESS sequence. The higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)
of the CSI-semi-LASER sequence, when compared to the conventional CSI-PRESS,
could be used to achieve a higher resolution or to reduce the acquisition time.CONCLUSION
The
implemented CSI-semi-LASER sequence for Bruker Biospec preclinical scanner with
Paravision 5.1 is suitable for high resolution multi-voxel spectroscopic
acquisitions in mouse brain studies, providing an alternative to the
conventional CSI-PRESS sequence, and producing spectra with improved resolution
and higher SNR. Further work will be devoted to make these sequences available to
be fully tested elsewhere.Acknowledgements
This work is funded by the INSPiRE-MED project
2019-2022 (H2020/MCSA COFUND, Grant agreement ID: 813120
All studies
involving animals were approved by the local ethics committee, according to
regional and state legislations (protocol references CEA-OH-9685/CEEAH-3665).
References
1. Arias-Ramos
N, Ferrer-Font L, Lope-Piedrafita S, Mocioiu V, Julià-Sapé M, Pumarola M, Arús
C, Candiota AP. Metabolomics of Therapy Response in Preclinical Glioblastoma: A
Multi-Slice MRSI-Based Volumetric Analysis for Noninvasive Assessment of
Temozolomide Treatment. Metabolites. 2017 May 18;7(2):20
2. Weiss,
K., Melkus, G., Jakob, P.M. et al. Quantitative in vivo 1H spectroscopic
imaging of metabolites in the early postnatal mouse brain at 17.6 T. Magn Reson
Mater Phy 22, 53 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-008-0142-2
3. Scheenen,
T.W.J., Klomp, D.W.J., Wijnen, J.P. and Heerschap, A. (2008), Short echo time
1H-MRSI of the human brain at 3T with minimal chemical shift displacement
errors using adiabatic refocusing pulses. Magn. Reson. Med., 59: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21302