Mehrgan Shahryari1, Pablo Gottheil2, Elisabeth Gertrud Hain3, Helge Herthum4, Heiko Tzschätzsch1, Tom Meyer1, Josef Alfons Käs2, Eberhard Siebert5, Vincent Prinz6,7, and Ingolf Sack1
1Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany, 2Faculty of Physics and Earth Sciences, Peter Debye Institute, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany, 3Department of Neuropathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany, 4Institute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany, 5Institute of Neuroradiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany, 6Department of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany, 7Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Synopsis
Clinical MRI is an important method for the delineation and characterization of gliomas for
resection planning and therapy monitoring in neurosurgery. Here, we used a 3D
curl- and phase-gradient based inversion algorithm in multifrequency magnetic resonance
elastography (MRE) to generate maps of the mechanical tumor properties, wave
speed and wave damping. Overall, our method improved the spatial resolution of MRE
maps in glioma patients and allowed precise measurement of tumor mechanical
properties. In the future, the method could help with characterization,
surgical planning and treatment monitoring of neuro tumors.
Introduction
Gliomas
are the most common primary brain tumors with a very poor survival rate.
Especially patients with a grade IV astrocytoma (glioblastoma), which makes up
75% of all glioma cases, have a 5-year survival rate of only 7%.1 Clinical MRI
plays a crucial role in detection, delineation and characterization of gliomas for
resection planning and therapy monitoring in neurosurgery.2 Conventional
imaging biomarkers are limited in their sensitivity to depict tumor borders,
histological subtype and mutation state.2 Thus, conventional
imaging cannot always provide information about tumor stage and aggressiveness.
Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) quantifies the mechanical properties of
soft tissue and can provide additional information for clinical tumor grading
and surgery planning. So far, only limited MRE data has been reported in glioma.3,4 The aim of this
study was to use multifrequency MRE combined with a 3D phase-gradient based
inversion algorithm to acquire high resolution maps of stiffness and wave
penetration in glioma patients.Methods
The
study protocol is in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was
approved by our institutional ethics review board. All patients gave written
informed consent. Overall, 23 patients with glioma were analyzed, from whom 3, 7
and 13 had a grade II, grade III and grade IV glioma, respectively. All
patients underwent presurgical clinical contrast enhanced (CE) MRI, diffusion
weighted MRI and multifrequency MRE. MRE was performed on a 3-Tesla MRI scanner
(Magnetom Lumina, Siemens Healthineers) using a single-shot, spin-echo, EPI
sequence with externally induced vibrations of 20, 25, 30 and 40 Hz. Eight
phase steps equally spaced over a full vibration cycle were acquired with 3D
flow-compensated motion encoding gradients.5 Up to 36 images
slices with a field of view (FOV) of 201×201 mm² and a resolution of 1.6×1.6×2 mm³
were acquired. Total scan time for a full multifrequency MRE data set was
approximately 7 min. After 2D motion correction, MRE phase images were
unwrapped, Fourier transformed and corrected for phase offsets between slices.6,7 3D curl fields
were calculated and decomposed into 20 3D wave propagation directions.7 MRE data were
then smoothed with a first order low-pass Butterworth filter with a threshold
of 200 m-1. Maps of shear wave speed (SWS) and penetration rate (PR)
were generated based on a 3D phase-gradient inversion. Contrast enhanced (CE) MPRAGE,
T2w images and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from diffusion weighted
images (DWI) were registered to MRE data using ITKsnap.8 Volume of
interest (VOI) of gliomas were manually drawn based on CE MPRAGE, T2w, ADC and
MRE magnitude, excluding cystic regions. For contralateral normal appearing
white matter (NAWM), the glioma VOIs were flipped and adjusted for sulci.
Glioma and NAWM values of SWS, PR and ADC were calculated. After biopsy or
surgical resection, histological tumor stains of hematoxylin and eosin (HE), elastica
van gieson (EvG), reticulin, CD31, p53 were conducted.Results
Figure
1 shows a representative slice of CE MPRAGE, curl wave fields, MRE maps and ADC
of a grade II astrocytoma in the left frontal lobe. The low-grade glioma
appears as a slightly softer mass with a reduced penetrations rate and
increased ADC compared to the NAWM. Figure 2 shows representative elastograms
and ADC of a grade III oligodendroglioma and a grade IV astrocytoma.
Mean SWS
was 0.91±0.08m/s, 1.14±0.16 m/s, and 0.88±0.15 m/s, for grade II, III and IV
gliomas, respectively. Mean PR was 0.48±0.07 m/s, 0.59±0.09 m/s, and 0.48±0.1 m/s,
for grade II, III and IV gliomas, respectively. Mean ADC was (1.59±0.28)×10-3
mm²/s for grade II, (1.27±0.03)×10-3 mm²/s for grade III, and (1.15±0.23)×10-3
mm²/s for grade IV gliomas. SWS was lower in gliomas than in NAWM (mean
difference: -0.15±0.19 m/s, P<0.001), whereas ADC was increased (mean
difference: (-0.4±0.3)×10-3 mm²/s, P<0.001). Figure 3 shows box
plots of the mechanical parameters grouped by WHO grade.
Grade
II and III glioma showed higher SWS values than glioblastoma (grade IV) (1.07±0.17
m/s vs. 0.88±0.15 m/s, P<0.05), while no difference was observed for ADC and
PR (P=0.056 and P=0.074, respectively). Soft glioblastoma tended to be heterogeneous
in terms of SWS. Figure 4 demonstrates a heterogenous, yet rather stiff
glioblastoma that was described as firm mass by the neurosurgeon.
Histopathological examination revealed high accumulation of elastin and
reticulin in the ECM of this glioblastoma. Automatic and quantifiable analyses of
histological stains are ongoing to reveal the association of tumor microenvironment
with MRE parameters (Figure 5).Discussion and Conclusion:
This study
shows the feasibility of 3D curl- and phase-gradient inversion-based
multifrequency MRE in glioma patients. Overall, the proposed method allows
generation of high-resolution MRE maps of shear wave speed and penetration rate
of the brain including glioma. We reproduced previous results, which indicate that
gliomas are softer than NAWM.3 Although
glioblastoma are heterogeneous in terms of morphology and viscoelastic
properties, they are softer than grade II and III gliomas. To understand the micromechanical
changes that determine the macroscopic mechanical properties and water
diffusivity of glioma across different WHO grades, a quantitative histopathological
analysis is needed and currently performed in our institution. The proposed multifrequency
MRE protocol and inversion pipeline can easily be integrated into a standard
neuroradiological workflow, thereby adding valuable information of tumor
consistency and aggressiveness for surgical planning and therapy monitoring.Acknowledgements
Funding
from the German Research Foundation (Sa901/17-2, GRK 2260 BIOQIC, SFB1340
Matrix in Vision) is gratefully acknowledged.References
1. Robert-Koch-Institut & Gesellschaft der epidemiologischen Krebsregister in Deutschland e, V. Krebs in Deutschland 2015/2016, (Berlin, 2019).
2. Weller, M., et al. European Association for Neuro-Oncology (EANO) guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of adult astrocytic and oligodendroglial gliomas. The Lancet Oncology 18, e315-e329 (2017).
3. Pepin, K.M., et al. MR Elastography Analysis of Glioma Stiffness and IDH1-Mutation Status. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39, 31-36 (2018).
4. Bunevicius, A., Schregel, K., Sinkus, R., Golby, A. & Patz, S. REVIEW: MR elastography of brain tumors. NeuroImage: Clinical 25, 102109 (2020).
5. Hirsch, S., Braun, J. & Sack, I. Magnetic Resonance Elastography: Physical Background And Medical Applications, (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2017).
6. Shahryari, M., et al. Reduction of breathing artifacts in multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography of the abdomen. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 85(2020).
7. Herthum, H., et al. Magnetic resonance elastography of the in vivo human brain using multifrequency wavenumber analysis in 2D and 3D. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of ISMRM. Virtual Conference. Abstract nr. 1023, (2021).
8. McCormick, M., Liu, X., Ibanez, L., Jomier, J. & Marion, C. ITK: enabling reproducible research and open science. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics 8(2014).