Andrew J Fagan1, Krystal Kirby1, Emily Koons1, and Kirk M Welker1
1Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
Synopsis
This study aimed to investigate the use of 7 Tesla MRI for frameless
pre-surgical planning for tumor resection applications. Image geometric distortions at the locations
of 10 skin-adhered fiducials were minimized in 7 Tesla images, and compared to in
vivo results from a current 3 Tesla frameless imaging protocol. Geometric accuracy of < 1 mm was obtained in
7 Tesla images at the surface of a head-shaped phantom.
Introduction
7T MRI offers significant benefits in terms of spatial and
contrast resolution compared to imaging at lower field strengths1,2. The superior image quality can better
delineate the targets of many interventional neurosurgical procedures such as
the basal ganglia regions which are targeted for deep brain stimulation surgery3, and tumors for surgical resection or
radiation therapy4. However, the potential for increased image
geometric distortions has impaired the use of 7T MRI for these applications,
casting doubt on the fidelity of the planning data5. Such distortions can arise from system-level
sources such as nonlinearity of the magnetic field gradients and inherent B0
inhomogeneity6, which occur
at all field strengths. However,
patient-specific sources of distortion such as increased magnetic
susceptibility-induced B0 inhomogeneities and chemical shift
artifacts are worse at higher fields, and the initial worry was that they would
prevent the use of 7T MRI for planning purposes where high geometric accuracy
is of paramount importance7.
To overcome this limitation, CT images are acquired and registered
to the MR images, thereby ensuring geometrical accuracy. This exposes the patient to an ionizing
radiation dose and further requires a second imaging examination for the
patient, with associated additional expense.
Furthermore, in applications where a stereotactic frame is not used, e.g.
in pre-surgical planning for tumor resection, the registration from MRI to
operating room space is performed using 10 skin-mounted fiducials placed around
the patients head. The location of such
fiducials close to areas where susceptibility and chemical shift effects are
greatest is a further cause for concern at 7T.
The aim of this study was to investigate the use of 7T MRI for
pre-surgical planning for frameless applications. Image geometric distortions at the locations
of 10 skin-mounted fiducials were minimized in 7T images via sequence
optimization, and compared to results from a current 3T frameless imaging
protocol.Methods
An oil-filled 3D grid phantom (150mm diameter, 140mm high; Figure
1) was developed to perform a fine calibration of the 7T system’s
gradients. The phantom’s ground truth
dimensions were determined via high-resolution CT imaging (Somatom Force,
Siemens). Baseline MR images of the
phantom were acquired using a high receiver-bandwidth sequence, repeated with
different frequency-encoding directions;
the average distance measurements between these acquisitions were used. An oil-filled head-shaped phantom with an added
surface fat layer was also imaged (CT and MR) with the fiducials in situ.
Three volunteers were
imaged (with informed consent) consecutively at 3T (Prisma, Siemens) and 7T
(Terra, Siemens). 10 skin-adhesive
fiducials (IZI Medical Products, USA) were placed on the subject’s exposed skin
surface at standard placement locations for frameless procedures (specifically:
nasion, superior mid frontal, and bilateral mastoid, zygoma, and frontal
areas). Care was taken to avoid touching
the fiducials when positioning the subjects in the head coils, per standard
protocol. The imaging protocol was comprised
MPRAGE, T2 SPACE and T2 SPACE FLAIR acquisitions; sequence details are
presented in Figure 2. The vendor’s 3D
distortion correction algorithm was used in each case. An additional GRE fieldmap was acquired on
both scanners using a multi-echo GRE sequence with TE1/2 = 4.76/9.52
ms at 3T, and TE1/2 = 1.14/3.14 ms at 7T. Custom code in Matlab was used to perform
distortion correction of the images using the fieldmap data. Fiducial localization was performed using 3D
Slicer (www.slicer.org), with absolute
fiducial positioning errors determined in phantom experiments following
registration to the CT images. For human
experiments, 3T and 7T images were registered and relative differences in
fiducial locations were determined. A
two-tailed paired t-test was used to detect statistically significant
differences in each case.Results
Phantom measurements at 7T revealed distance scaling errors of 1.1%,
2.2% and 1.0% along the x-, y- and z-axes respectively. These system mis-calibrations were traced
back to deviations from sphericity of the scanner’s vendor calibration
phantom. A global gradient scaling
correction (GSC) factor was applied to correct for this; the effects of this correction factor for one
subject’s images are shown in Figure 3. Geometric
distortion (MR compared to ground truth CT data) was <1mm for the 7T images
acquired with 1020Hz/pixel BW.
Data for the relative fiducial location measurement differences
between 3T and 7T subjects are presented in Figure 4. The GSC factor and higher receiver bandwidth
had the most impact on the fiducial location accuracy, while the fieldmap
correction effected no change. Figure 5
shows corresponding the SPACE and FLAIR data. Discussion & Conclusions
Highly accurate 7T images with <1mm geometric distortion
compared to CT images, were obtained with an optimized imaging sequence. Fieldmap corrections were found to be
unnecessary, once the GSC was applied and high receiver bandwidth images used. Judicious placement of fiducials is still
warranted to avoid potential for skin movement, or dislodgement due to the
close-fitting 7T head coil. Furthermore,
locations low in the head should be avoided due to the signal drop-off at 7T
(due to B0 and B1 issues, and head coil
limitations).
In conclusion, 7T MRI can be used to perform frameless
pre-surgical planning with skin-adhesive fiducials with slight modifications to
standard imaging sequences (using high receiver bandwidth) and provided the
system gradient calibrations are checked. Fiducial location is also an important
consideration.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Fagan
AJ, Welker KM, Amrami KK, et al. Image Artifact Management for Clinical
Magnetic Resonance Imaging on a 7 T Scanner Using Single-Channel Radiofrequency
Transmit Mode. Invest Radiol 2019;54:781-91.
2. Ladd
ME, Bachert P, Meyerspeer M, et al. Pros and cons of ultra-high-field MRI/MRS
for human application. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 2018;109:1-50.
3. Rusheen
A, Goyal A, Owen R, et al. The development of ultra-high field MRI guidance
technology for neuronavigation. Journal of Neurosurgery 2021;accepted.
4. Peerlings
J, Compter I, Janssen F, et al. Characterizing geometrical accuracy in
clinically optimised 7T and 3T magnetic resonance images for high-precision
radiation treatment of brain tumours. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2019;9:35-42.
5. Voormolen
EH, Diederen SJH, Woerdeman P, et al. Implications of Extracranial Distortion
in Ultra-High-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Image-Guided Cranial
Neurosurgery. World Neurosurg 2019;126:e250-e8.
6. Lau
JC, Khan AR, Zeng TY, MacDougall KW, Parrent AG, Peters TM. Quantification of
local geometric distortion in structural magnetic resonance images: Application
to ultra-high fields. Neuroimage 2018;168:141-51.
7. Duchin
Y, Abosch A, Yacoub E, Sapiro G, Harel N. Feasibility of using ultra-high field
(7 T) MRI for clinical surgical targeting. PLoS One 2012;7:e37328.