Belinda Ding1, Catarina Rua1,2, and Christopher T Rodgers1
1Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2Invicro LLC, A Konica Minolta Company, London, United Kingdom
Synopsis
Most
7T MRI sites have two head coils available for neuroimaging: a single-transmit
coil and one capable of parallel transmission (pTx, or 8Tx). The 8Tx coil has a
circularly polarised (CP) mode, allowing it to play RF waveforms identical to
its 1Tx counterpart. This study compares the performance of a 1Tx coil against
an 8Tx coil from the same manufacturer for routine neuroimaging. The 8Tx coil
gave better B1+ profiles in posterior brain regions which
translates into improvements in other imaging sequences. It also enables the
inclusion of pTx-enabled sequences. However, more detailed studies are needed
before pooling data.
Introduction
Most
7T MRI sites have two head coils available for neuroimaging: a 1Tx head-coil for
the single transmission (1Tx) system and an 8Tx head-coil for the parallel
transmission (8Tx) system. In the circularly polarised (CP) mode (also known as
TrueForm) the 8Tx coil should be identical to its 1Tx counterpart. However, no
study has assessed this.
Thus,
we want to compare the performance of both systems for some commonly used
sequences1 to determine any potential
impact of switching routine 7T neuroimaging from 1Tx to 8Tx system in CP mode.Methods
Six
volunteers (2 female; age = 31.3±4.5 years; BMI=21.3±1.2 kg/m2)
were scanned on a MAGNETOM Terra 7T MRI (Siemens Healthineers). Two scans were
performed per participant: one on the 1Tx system with the 1Tx32Rx head coil (Nova
Medical, USA) and another on the 8Tx system in CP mode with the 8Tx32Rx head
coil (Nova Medical, USA). The CP mode’s per-channel complex weightings should
give similar B1+ to the birdcage 1Tx coil. Thus, both
coils should give similar B1+ spatio-temporal waveforms.
Scans
were performed on the same day with a 15-minute break to allow switching
between the systems. The time taken for the switch (inclusive of coil change)
was also recorded.
Data acquisition:
Six imaging sequences were acquired:
dual-echo GRE for B0-mapping, turbo-FLASH for B1+-mapping,
MP2RAGE, multi-echo GRE, GRE-EPI (5 subjects), and DTI with SE-EPI (3 subjects).
The transmit voltage was determined automatically by the scanner. B0-shimming
was performed using the scanner’s auto-calibration routine and manual tuning of
shim currents to minimise measured linewidths. All imaging scans had the same
shim volume. Figure
1 shows the scanning parameters used.
Data analysis:
Data
analysis was conducted using FSL (v6.0.3, FMRIB, UK)2 unless otherwise specified,
and the workflow is shown in Figure 1. All ROI analyses were done in the native
imaging space. A paired two-tailed Student’s t-test was used for statistical
testing.
Results
On
average, switching from 1Tx to 8Tx took 6:30 min and switching from 8Tx to 1Tx
took 5:58 min.
Histograms
of whole-brain B0 and B1+ values are presented
in Figure
2.
There were no significant differences in the mean and standard deviations (std)
of B0. There is a split peak in the 8Tx B0-histogram for
subject 2 due to a possible operator’s error when performing manual shimming.
We saw
significantly higher mean-B1+ values with the 8Tx system
in the caudate, insula, putamen, and temporal lobes. This improvement did not come with a penalty
on the homogeneity: the 8Tx system showed significantly lower std-B1+
in six out of nine ROIs.
Both
coils showed similar MP2RAGE image quality in the cerebrum, with no significant
differences in grey, white matter, and ventricular volumes (Figure
3).
However, differences were seen in the brainstem and cervical spine. The spinal
cord was only defined in 50% of the subjects with the 1Tx system, while clear
boundaries between the spinal cord and spinal canal were seen in all volunteers
with the 8Tx system.
Figures
4A,
B and C show the EPI tSNR maps with the mean and std-tSNR measurements. There were
no significant changes in tSNR in any ROIs. Considering homogeneity in tSNR,
the 8Tx system showed significantly higher std-tSNR in four basal-ganglia ROIs
but significantly lower std-tSNR in the occipital-lobe ROIs. In terms of R2*, the largest differences were
observed in vessels and edges of the cortex (Figure 4D and E), but no
significant differences in the mean and std-R2* values were detected.
DTI
images are shown in Figure 5. The b=0s/mm2 images show a reduction of dropouts in
the temporal lobes and cerebellum using the 8Tx system. The increased signal in
those areas translates into more defined fitted white matter tracts.Discussion
The
two coils are often considered to be approximately equivalent (in CP mode). However,
it is clear that the 8Tx coil actually provides better B1+
efficiency in posterior brain regions. This translates into improved image
quality for MP2RAGE and DTI without compromising other imaging sequences.
Switching
to 8Tx mode and back took on average 12:28 min in total. With careful
scheduling, it is feasible to run routine research protocols on the 8Tx system.
Running protocols on the 8Tx system also opens up the possibility of including
B1-shimmed/parallel transmission (pTx) protocols as add-on scans.
Although
scanning on the 8Tx host does show some advantages, there are issues to
consider before fully migrating protocols onto it. For example, changes in DTI
signal intensity in the temporal lobes might affect a study if data acquired
from the two different coils must be pooled. A future intra-coil and inter-coil
reproducibility study will be needed to understand whether data can be pooled
from both coils.Conclusion
Overall,
both systems give comparable image quality for routine neuroimaging (MP2RAGE
structural, GRE-EPI, ME-GRE and DTI). The 8Tx coil gives more B1+
in the posterior brain regions which could benefit studies targeting those
areas. It also allows pTx-enabled sequences to be run as an “add-on” to standard
clinical protocols. Thus,
we believe other sites could usefully investigate migrating their routine
neuroimaging protocols to the 8Tx coil.Acknowledgements
BD is funded by Gates Cambridge. CTR is funded by the
Wellcome Trust and Royal Society (098436/Z/12/B). This research was supported
by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC-1215-20014). The views
expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or
the Department of Health and Social Care. References
-
Clarke, W. T. et
al. Multi-site harmonization of 7 tesla MRI neuroimaging protocols. NeuroImage
206, 116335 (2020).
- Jenkinson,
M., Beckmann, C. F., Behrens, T. E. J., Woolrich, M. W. & Smith, S. M.
Review FSL. Neuroimage 62, 782–790 (2012).
- Pei,
M. et al. Algorithm for fast monoexponential fitting based on
Auto-Regression on Linear Operations (ARLO) of data. Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine 73, 843–850 (2015).