Xipeng Yue1, Yan Bai1, Ge Zhang1, Yu Shen1, Xianchang Zhang2, and Meiyun Wang*1
1Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China, 2MR Collaboration, Siemens Healthineers Ltd., Beijing, China
Synopsis
Conventional
static functional connectivity analysis does not capture transient and atypical
changes in functional connectivity between neural networks in the autism
spectrum disorder (ASD) patients. In this study, we evaluated rsfMRI data of
108 adult ASD patients by dynamic functional network connectivity (dFNC)
analysis using sliding time window correlation and K-means clustering methods. Our
results showed that higher dwell time and altered functional connectivity between
multiple nodes in FNC state 2 correlated with clinical ASD scores. Therefore, our
study demonstrates that aberrant and transient functional connectivity changes
between neural networks in ASD patients can be evaluated by dFNC analysis.
Introduction
Autism spectrum
disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by difficulties in
social communication, repetitive behaviors, and limited interests [1].
The symptoms of ASD adversely affect daily living activities and the quality of
life. Traditional static brain functional connectivity analysis in pediatric
ASD patients do not account for the dynamic changes in brain functions as the
children grow older [2]. Moreover,
differences in selective attention abilities and executive motor functions have
been observed between pediatric and adult ASD patients [3]. Besides, static functional connectivity
analysis does not capture dynamic and variable brain functional connectivity in
ASD patients [4]. Therefore,
in this study, we analyzed resting state fMRI data of adult ASD patients using dynamic
functional network connectivity (dFNC) analysis to identify dynamic alterations
in functional connectivity between neural networks
in adult ASD patients. We also evaluated the relationship between altered
functional connectivity and clinicopathological characteristics of ASD patients.Methods
Data
Acquisition
We
acquired neuroimaging data for 108 adult male ASD patients and 90 age-matched healthy male subjects from the open acess ABIDE
database (from 6 different study sites;
http://fcon_1000.projects.nitrc.org/indi/abide/abide_I.html) and Henan Provincial
People's Hospital (0/10, ASD/controls). The rs-fMRI data (Henan
Provincial People's Hospital) was acquired on a MAGNETOM Prisma 3T MRI scanner
(Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) using a single-shot gradient-recalled
echo planar imaging sequence with the following parameters: TR/TE = 2000 ms/35
ms, Flip Angle = 90°, FOV = 207 mm × 207 mm, number of
slices = 75, slice thickness = 2.2 mm,
matrix = 94 × 94, measurements = 240, total acquisition time = 8 mins.
Data
Processing and Analysis
We
only analyzed the first 150 volumes of data for each enrolled subject to
eliminate any scan time variations for acquiring rs-fMRI data at different
sites. We preprocessed the rs-fMRI data using the RESTPlus software V1.22 (http://www.restfmri.net).
This included slice timing, motion correction, registration and nomalizing to the
MNI template with 3x3x3 mm3 resolution, and smoothing with an 8-mm
full-width half maximum isotropic Gaussian kernel. The group ICA package of the
GIFT software (http://mialab.mrn.org/software/gift/)
was used to convert all preproceesed data into 13 independent components (ICs),
which were further categorized into 11 resting state networks (RSNs) using the Standford
functional ROIs as a template, namely, auditory network
(AUDN), basal ganglia network (BGN), language network (LN), sensorimotor
network (SMN), precuneus network (PUCN), salience network (SN), visuospatial
network (VSN), dorsal default mode network (dDMN), high visual network (hVIS),primvisual
network (pVIS), and ventral default mode network (vDMN) (Figure 1). We then
performed dynamic functional network connectivity (FNC) analysis with the
sliding window correlation approach (window length = 30 TRs, step size = 1 TR) using
the GIFT package [5]. We then generated the FNC matrix for each study
subject by evaluating the time course for each pair of the 11 RSNs by
calculating the Pearson’s correlation coefficients. Then, we clustered all the
FNC matrices using the K-means algorithm and evaluated the occurrence frequency
and structure of the FNC states. The optimal cluster (states) number was set to
K=5. Subsequently, we compared the connectivity strengths and dwell times
(average time spent in each state before changing to another state) in all five
states for all ASD patients and healthy control subjects.
Statistical analysis
The
two-sample t-test (p<0.05 with FDR correction) was used to evaluate differences
in connectivity strengths between the HC and ASD patient groups. The dwell time
differences in each state between the HC and ASD patient groups were analyzed using
the Mann-Whitney U-test (P<0.05 with Bonferroni correction). We also used
Pearson’s correlation test to evaluate the relationships between mean dwell
time and the four clinical autism diagnostic observation schedule (ADOS) scores
(ADOS_TOTAL, ADOS_COMM, ADOS_SOCIAL, and ADOS_STEREO_BEHAV).Results
We
identified five FNC states in the clustering analysis (Figure 2). The occurrence frequency for states 1 to 5 were 25%, 28%,
3%, 35%, and 8%, respectively. The dwell time in state 2 was significantly
higher for the ASD group compared to the HC group (P=0.014). Moreover,
the dwell time in the ASD group positively correlated with the ADOS_STEREO_BEHAV
score (R= 0.216, P= 0.029). The connectiviy strength in state 2 was
significantly different between ASD and HC groups, with increased connectivity
between dDMN and SN, and reduced connectivity between SMN and PUCN as well as
SMN and Hvis (P FDR <0.05). Discussion & Conclusion
Our
study showed that mean dwell time in the individual brain functional states was
significantly higher in adult ASD patients compared to the healthy controls. Furthermore,
aberrant dwell time in the adult ASD patients correlated with the ADOS_STEREO_BEHAV
score. The adult ASD patients also showed hypoconnectivity between SMN and PUCN
as well as SMN and hVIS, and hypeconnectivity between dDMN and SN in dFNC state
2. These brain networks are related to cognition, which is significantly
affected in adult ASD patients. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate the
ability of the dynamic functional network connectivity (dFNC) analysis to
identify dynamic and transient alterations in specific neural networks of adult
ASD patients.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement
found.References
1. Philip RC, Dauvermann MR, Whalley HC, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis
of the fMRI investigation of autism spectrum disorders. Neuroscience and
biobehavioral reviews. 2012; 36(2): 901-42.
2. Anagnostou E, Taylor M J. Review of
neuroimaging in autism spectrum disorders: what have we learned and where we go
from here. Molecular autism. 2011; 2(1): 4.
3. Justus SA, Powell PS, Duarte A. Intact
context memory performance in adults with autism spectrum disorder. Sci Rep.
2021; 11(1): 20482.
4. Calhoun VD, Miller R, Pearlson G, et al. The chronnectome: time-varying
connectivity networks as the next frontier in fMRI data discovery. Neuron. 2014;
84(2): 262-274.
5. Du Y, Pearlson GD, Yu Q, et al. Interaction among subsystems
within default mode network diminished in schizophrenia patients: A dynamic
connectivity approach. Schizophr Res. 2016; 170(1): 55-65.