Yulin Chang1, Daniel Nicolas Splitthoff2, Wei-ching Lo1, M. Dylan Tisdall3, and Andre van der Kouwe4
1Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc., Malvern, PA, United States, 2Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany, 3Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States, 4Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
Synopsis
We show
that for navigator-based prospective motion correction MRI, acceleration of 3D
EPI acquisition increases sequence flexibility and improves the navigator image
quality without sacrificing the quality of motion correction.
Introduction
Navigator-based prospective motion correction (PMC) has
become indispensable in MRI to manage motion artifact in both clinic and
research1-3. This approach is relatively easy to set up as it does
not reply on additional hardware for motion tracking. However, the real-time navigator
acquisitions require “dead time” in the MRI pulse sequence and this imposes limits
on the sequence timing. For 3D EPI-based volumetric navigators (vNavs), in
addition to the extended time needed for the full 3D volume acquisition, the
prolonged echo train for each partition also results in signal loss and image distortion.
Accelerated EPI acquisitions have shown improved imaging speed and image
quality4. In this study, we explore the impact of accelerating the navigator
on sequence timing, navigator image quality, and real-time motion correction
for structural imaging of the brain.Methods
The
prototype MR pulse sequence used in this study consists of MPRAGE5
as the “parent” sequence and 3D-EPI as the navigator in each TR between the
inversion RF pulse and the turbo-FLASH readout3. Details of the
MPRAGE: 1 mm isotropic resolution, sagittal orientation, 240×210×160
matrix (with 10% oversampling along partition), phase-encoding acceleration
factor of 2, phase partial Fourier 6/8; TR=2.5 s, 4-echo readout6
with TE=2.08/3.84/5.60/7.36 ms and bandwidth of 720 Hz/pixel. The navigator
details: 256 mm cubic FOV and 32×32×32 matrix; a single-shot EPI readout
for each partition; partition partial Fourier 6/8; binomial water excitation RF
pulses of 2°
or sinc RF of 1°; readout with ramp sampling and bandwidth of 5040
Hz/pixel.
An in-plane
acceleration factor of 3 is used to reduce the single-shot EPI echo train
from 32 echoes to 11 echoes for each navigator partition, which reduced TE from
6.68 ms to 3.60 ms and the total readout duration from 8.96 ms to 3.08 ms. An additional
acceleration factor of 2 along partition was also used in selected scans to
reduce the total navigator acquisition time. GRAPPA7 is used to
reconstruct the accelerated navigators in real-time based on the external GRE
reference scan at the beginning of the sequence. An anthropomorphic head
phantom8 and two volunteers were scanned on a 3 T MAGNETOM Prisma (Siemens
Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) whole-body scanner with a 32-ch receive head
coil. A written consent was obtained from each volunteer. Volunteers were
instructed to move during the scan. Results
With
3×
in-plane acceleration, the total navigator acquisition is reduced from 272 ms
to 125 ms (sinc pulse; from 355 ms to 208 ms for water excitation), and to just
65 ms when combined with 2× partition acceleration. The shortened navigator allows
shorter TI (≤1100
ms) for MPRAGE to optimize the gray-white matter contrast6 compared
to the minimum allowed TI (1260 ms) with no acceleration.
Figure 1 compares the
image quality between fully sampled and 3× accelerated navigators. For
the fully sampled navigators, signal dropout is visible for areas of high
susceptibility, whereas the signals in these areas are visibly improved for the
accelerated navigators (red arrows). In addition, due to the effective TI change
(from 247 ms to 156 ms), the accelerated navigator exhibits enhanced gray-white
matter contrast (yellow arrow). The utility of the accelerated navigator for
PMC is shown in Fig. 2, where two scans with moderate motions were acquired.
Clearly, PMC using the 3× accelerated navigator significantly improves image
quality compared to the one without motion correction. As shown in Fig. 3, at 3×
acceleration, different gray-white matter contrasts can be obtained over the extended
range of effective navigator TIs allowed by partition partial Fourier of
MPRAGE, even though the overall brain signals are suppressed (similar to FatNav9).
These navigators, despite their different appearance, are all shown to be effective in reducing motion artifact with PMC. Figure 4 shows phantom and in vivo
navigator images acquired with the additional 2× partition acceleration. Note
at this level of acceleration (6×) there is nearly no discernible
parallel imaging artifact or g-factor10 penalty.Discussion
Acceleration of the
navigator acquisition in PMC provides several benefits. Most importantly, the
reduced temporal footprint requires less dead time in the sequence, rendering
more flexibility in the timing of a sequence and potentially allowing vNav to
be used in more sequences. Specific for MPRAGE, this translates into shorter TI
for contrast optimization. Second, geometric distortion of the navigator is
substantially reduced in proportion to the acceleration factor. Third, signal
dropouts are reduced by the shorter navigator TE. Finally, since the navigator
itself is acquired on the T1 recovery curve, a steady state
can never be assumed. Therefore, a shorter acquisition window leads to less
image and contrast blurring. For MPRAGE, our data showed that the navigator should
be acquired closer to the inversion pulse in order to maximize SNR.Conclusions
In this study we demonstrated
that accelerated navigators allow for more flexibility of sequence timing and improve
navigator image quality without compromising the motion correction
functionality.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.
White N, Roddey C, Shankaranarayanan A, Han E,
Rettmann D, Santos J, Kuperman J, Dale A, PROMO: Real-Time Prospective Motion
Correction in MRI Using Image-Based Tracking, Magn Reson Med, 2010;63:91-105
2.
Hess AT, Tisdall MD, Andronesi OC, Meintjes EM,
van der Kouwe AJW, Real-time Motion and B0 Corrected Single Voxel
Spectroscopy Using Volumetric Navigators, Magn Reson Med, 2011;66:314-323
3.
Tisdall MD, Hess AT, Reuter M, Meintjes EM,
Fischl B, van der Kouwe AJW, Volumetric Navigators for Prospective Motion
Correction and Selective Reacquisition in Neuroanatomical MRI, Magn Reson Med,
2012;68:389-399
4.
de Zwart JA, van Gelderen P, Golay X, Ikonomidou
VN, Duyn JH. Accelerated parallel imaging for functional imaging of the human.
NMR Biomed 2006;19:342–351
5.
Mugler JP III, Brookeman JR, Three-dimensional
magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo imaging (3D MP RAGE), Magn Reson
Med, 1990;15:152-157
6.
van der Kouwe AJW, Benner T, Salat DH, Fischl B.
Brain morphometry with multiecho MPRAGE. Neuroimage 2008;40:559–569.
7.
Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, Nittka M,
Jellus V, Wang J, Kiefer B, Haase A, Generalized Autocalibrating Partially
Parallel Acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med, 2002;47:1202-1210
8.
Graedel NN, Polimeni JR, Guerin B, Gagoski B,
Wald LL, An anatomically realistic temperature phantom for radiofrequency
heating measurements. Magn Reson Med, 2015;73:442-450
9.
Skare S, Hartwig A, Martensson M, Avventi E,
Engstrom M, Properties of a 2D Fat Navigator for Prospective Image Domain
Correction of Nodding Motion in Brain MRI. Magn Reson Med, 2015;73:1110-1119
10.
Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB,
Boesiger P, SENSE: Sensitivity Encoding for Fast MRI. Magn Reson Med,
1999;42:952-962