Siu Lung Tang1, Kristina Sabaroedin2, Will Wilson2, Daniel Pittman2, Paolo Federico2, and Pierre LeVan2
1Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 2Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Synopsis
The potential of using features derived from resting-state fMRI
time series to localize epileptic brain areas was studied. Static and dynamic
correlations between local spike rates measured with intracranial EEG and
regional homogeneity (ReHo), amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF),
and functional connectivity (FC), respectively, were analyzed based on data
collected from 13 subjects with refractory epilepsy. While static measures of ReHo
and ALFF were not statistically correlated with spike rates measured during
long-term monitoring, static correlation with FC was apparent. However, in dynamic analysis, temporal variations in instantaneous
spike rates were associated with synchronous fluctuations of both ALFF and FC.
Introduction
In patients with refractory focal epilepsy, seizure freedom can be best achieved by the surgical
resection of epileptic brain areas, although this depends heavily on whether
these areas can be precisely identified1,2,3. The gold standard to localize those areas is
intracranial EEG (iEEG), an invasive procedure that involves implanting
electrodes in the brain, yet only offers limited brain
coverage4. In contrast, functional MRI (fMRI) is a
non-invasive procedure that measures activity across the entire brain. This
study investigates the possibility of using features from resting-state fMRI
time series to predict the location of epileptic brain areas.Methods
iEEG data were collected at 10 kHz using SynAmps
amplification/digitization system and Scan 4.4 Software (Compumedics NeuroScan)
on 13 subjects. Concurrent resting-state fMRI data were
acquired by a GE Discovery MR750 scanner using
established safety protocols5. The 3T scanner adopted echo
planar imaging sequence with \(\mathrm{TR}/\mathrm{TE}=1500/30\) ms, 24-cm field of view,
\(64 \times 64\) matrix, 24 5-mm thick slices6. The fMRI scans consisted of 1 to 3 20-minute sessions for
each subject.
FMRI data were motion-corrected and normalized
to MNI space using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) software. Motion
parameters were regressed out from the fMRI time series and the data were
bandpass filtered between 0.01-0.1 Hz. Several features readily available in fMRI time
series, which included regional homogeneity (ReHo) and amplitude of
low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) were computed at
every iEEG channel location to enable comparisons with the corresponding spike
rates measured at every channel. Additionally, functional connectivity (FC) was
computed between every channel location and a reference defined as the channel
where interictal spikes were most.
Static correlations were first analyzed,
whereby Spearman’s correlation coefficient (\(\rho\)) was computed between
spike rates measured during long-term monitoring and each of the features
listed above for every session of every subject to obtain
\(\rho_{\mathrm{ReHo}}\), \(\rho_{\mathrm{ALFF}}\), and \(\rho_{\mathrm{FC}}\),
where subscripts denote the corresponding fMRI features. Afterwards, the statistical significance of the correlations at the
group level was determined by a \(t\)-test on the Fisher-transformed \(\rho\) of
every subject (Fig.1).
Dynamic correlations were then analyzed
by decomposing the fMRI time series into segments of 120 \(s\), with
\(50 \%\) overlap. All features were then calculated within each segment and correlated across time with the instantaneous
spike rate fluctuations seen on iEEG during the scan (Fig.2).Results
Among 30 sessions conducted, only 4 of them showed
significant static \(\rho_{\mathrm{ReHo}}\). From all sessions combined, static
\(\rho_{\mathrm{ReHo}}\) was only marginally
significant (\(p=0.03\)) (Fig.1). For
ALFF, 12 sessions showed significant static correlation with spike rate,
although half were positive and half were negative. At the group level, a much
wider distribution of static \(\rho_{\mathrm{ALFF}}\) than that of \(\rho_{\mathrm{ReHo}}\) was thus obtained,
with approximately half of the sessions conducted having static
\(\rho_{\mathrm{ALFF}}\) within \([-0.2, 0.2]\). The
inconsistent sign of \(\rho_{\mathrm{ALFF}}\) across
subjects thus led to it not being significantly different from zero, at the group level. For FC, its distribution of
static \(\rho_{\mathrm{FC}}\) was the widest among them all, with a range of \([-0.4, 0.6]\), and a \(p\)-value \(<
0.001\), indicating FC between channels exhibited significant static
correlations with spike rates.
Preliminary findings revealed that dynamic \(\rho_{\mathrm{ALFF}}\)
and \(\rho_{\mathrm{FC}}\) were strongly correlated with spike rates across
time segments. However, dynamic correlations between
fMRI features and instantaneous spike rates would only be expected in cases where
there were sufficient fluctuations in spike rates during the scan. Therefore,
these correlations are plotted in Fig.2 as a function of the coefficient of variation in spike
rates across time segments, defined as the ratio between standard
deviation (\(\sigma\)) and mean (\(\mu\)) spike rate of all segments in every
time series. In Fig.2a, no
significant relationship is found for dynamic \(\rho_{\mathrm{ReHo}}\).
For ALFF, statistically significant correlation between dynamic
\(\rho_{\mathrm{ALFF}}\) and \(\sigma/\mu\) was recorded (\(r=0.251\),
\(p\)-value \(<0.001\)), demonstrating that channels with high
\(\rho_{\mathrm{ALFF}}\) were likely associated with high temporal variations
in spike rate (high \(\sigma/\mu\)) (Fig.2b). In
Fig.2c, dynamic \(\rho_{\mathrm{FC}}\) between
simultaneously spiking channels followed similar response to \(\sigma/\mu\) as
that depicted in the case of ALFF. Though the magnitude of correlation, \(r\),
between \(\rho_{\mathrm{FC}}\) and \(\sigma/\mu\) was weak, a clear trend of
high \(\sigma/\mu\) accompanying high dynamic \(\rho_{\mathrm{FC}}\) was
evident.Conclusion
The prospect of using features derived from fMRI time series,
specifically, ReHo, ALFF, and FC, to predict the locations of brain areas generating epileptic spikes was
examined. In terms of static correlation, sensitivity of ReHo to changes in spike
rate measured during long term monitoring was minimal. Moreover, \(t\)-test on
the corresponding set of Fisher’s \(z\) scores showed that ALFF was not
statistically significant at the group level, likely
due to inconsistent relationships across subjects and sessions.
Nonetheless, strong static correlation was found between FC and spike rate.
Analysis on dynamic correlations revealed that while no statistically
significant relationship was obtained for ReHo, ALFF
and FC showed significant association with instantaneous spike rates. Overall,
ALFF and FC thus appear to reflect the instantaneous
occurrence of interictal epileptic discharges during the fMRI scan. To be
considered suitable clinical biomarkers to identify the locations of epileptic brain areas, resting-state fMRI features would
thus need to take into account dynamic fluctuations in interictal activity
occurring during the scan.Acknowledgements
This study was funded by NSERC Discovery Grant RGPIN-2021-02797.References
1. Rosenow F, Luders H. Presurgical evaluation of epilepsy. Brain.
2001;124(9):1683-1700.
2. Wellmer J, von der Groeben F, Klarmann U, et al. Risks and
benefits of invasive epilepsy surgery workup with implanted subdural and depth
electrodes. Epilepsia. 2012;53(8):1322-1332.
3. Thomschewski A, Hincapie A, Frauscher B. Localization of the
Epileptogenic Zone Using High Frequency Oscillations. Front Neurol. 2019;10:94.
4. Jobst B, Bartolomei F, Diehl B, et al. Intracranial EEG in the
21st Century. Epilepsy Curr. 2020;20(4):180-188.
5. Boucousis S, Beers C, Cunningham C, et al. Feasibility of an
intracranial EEG-fMRI protocol at 3T: risk assessment and image quality.
Neuroimage. 2012;63(3):1236-1248.
6. Aghakhani Y, Beers C, Pittman D. Co-localization between the
BOLD response and epileptiform discharges recorded by simultaneous intracranial
EEG-fMRI at 3 T. Neuroimage Clin. 2015; 7(7):755-763.