Merel JA Eussen1,2, Jacobus FA Jansen2,3, Twan Voncken4, Mariette HJA Debeij-van Hall5, Jos GM Hendriksen4,5, Jeroen R Vermeulen4, Sylvia Klinkenberg4, Walter H Backes2,3, and Gerhard Drenthen2,3
1Department of Biomedical Technology, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 2Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands, 3School for Mental Health & Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands, 4Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands, 5Department of Behavioral Sciences, Kempenhaeghe, Heeze, Netherlands
Synopsis
Cognitive deficits have been reported in children with childhood absence
epilepsy (CAE). Regional alterations in morphology in children with CAE are
likely related to the changes in the underlying network structure. Structural
covariance networks (SCNs) based on interregional correlations of cortical
thicknesses can describe these changes. To relate cognitive performance to
network efficiency, individual SCNs are derived from anatomical MR images of
the control group and one patient. The global efficiency calculated from the
resulting SCNs showed a negative relation with cognitive performance for
children with CAE.
Introduction
Childhood absence
epilepsy (CAE) is a generalized epilepsy and is a common form of epilepsy in
school-aged children, typically between 6 and 12 years old. These children
experience frequent, brief absence seizures during which the child is not aware
or responsive. CAE has been considered as a benign condition, since most
children become seizure-free when reaching adulthood. However, various
cognitive impairments have been previously reported in children with CAE
compared to controls1,2,3. Moreover, a previous neuroimaging study
also revealed regional alterations in cortical thickness in children with CAE4.
Possibly, these regional changes are not independent, but are related to an
underlying network structure, which can be described by the structural
covariance network (SCN). The SCN is constructed using interregional
correlations of morphological properties, such as cortical thicknesses, and
rests on the assumption that functional and/or axonal connected regions share
similar patterns of morphology5. The SCNs can subsequently be
characterized using graph theoretic analysis, which can provide measures
related to network efficiency. The aim of this study is to investigate the
potential relation between network efficiency of individual SCNs and cognitive
performance of children with CAE. Methods
Data
acquisition
Sixteen children
with clinically diagnosed CAE (6-12y, 12 male) and 15 healthy, age- and
sex-matched control subjects (6-12y, 11 male) were included6. The
Full Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ) of all participants was assessed using
the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children third edition (WISC-III). All
subjects were scanned on a 3.0T (Philips Achieva) scanner using a 32-element
phased-array coil. Structural MR images were acquired for each subject using a
T1-weighted three-dimensional turbo field echo sequence (TR = 8.4 ms, TE = 3.8
ms, FA = 8°, voxel size 1 mm3).
Preprocessing
As part of the
Freesurfer pipeline, T1-weighted images were parcellated into 68 cortical
regions based on the Desikan-Killiany atlas, and for each region the mean
cortical thickness was determined. Subsequently, for each region, potential
effects of age, sex and total intercranial volume on the cortical thickness
were regressed out via linear regression models.
SCN
construction
For the SCN
analysis, each brain region is treated as a node in the network, while the
connection strength between the nodes was calculated by the Pearson coefficient
across a group of subjects. Therefore, an individual SCN cannot be obtained
directly. Previously, Saggar et al.7 introduced the Add-One-Patient
approach to estimate the individual contribution of a patient on the SCN of the
control group. In short, the SCN is generated for the control group including
one patient. Next, the graph metric is calculated from the resulting SCN. This
process is repeated for all subsequent patients, resulting in individual graph
metrics for each patient. Negative and non-significant correlations were not
considered, to cope with false positive connections. Subsequently, the
resulting adjacency matrix is binarized using sparsity thresholds ranging from
85.5%-90% with increments of 0.5%. This allows for comparisons of networks with
the same number of connections, which is important since the graph metrics are
influenced by the sparsity of the network (i.e. the number of connections). The
graph metric used to characterize the network efficiency is the global
efficiency, which is inversely related to the mean path lengths between all
pairs of nodes in a sparse graph8. This metric is normalized with
respect to 100 random networks with a preserved degree and strength
distribution. A graphical representation of the method is
given in Figure 1. All preprocessing and SCN analyses were performed in Matlab.
Statistical
analysis
After visual
assessment, a Box-Cox transformation is performed on the non-normally
distributed global efficiency values. To investigate whether the global network
efficiency relates significantly to the FSIQ of children with CAE, a linear
regression model was applied. Age and sex are added to the model as covariates.
Statistical significance was inferred when p < 0.05.Results
A significant
negative relation between global efficiency and FSIQ was found at a sparsity
level of 88.5% (β = -1.21, p = 0.03) and 89% (β = -1.21, p = 0.04). This indicates
that at both sparsity levels, a lower FSIQ is associated with a higher global
efficiency in children with CAE. A scatterplot of the Box-Cox transformed
global efficiency as function as FSIQ at sparsity level
88.5% is shown in Figure 2.Discussion & Conclusion
This study
demonstrates that the global efficiency calculated from individual cortical thickness
derived SCNs is significantly related to the FSIQ of children with CAE. The
negative relation for global efficiency and FSIQ indicates that for
a more efficient network the FSIQ score is lower. This is in line with the
findings of a prior SCN study in epilepsy, which reported that higher clustered
(i.e. more efficient) networks related to epilepsy severity, in terms of lower
cognitive performance scores, younger age at onset and higher seizure frequency9.
From
the results presented here, a relation between global efficiency and epilepsy
severity cannot be formally drawn, therefore, this needs to be further
investigated in future work.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Fonseca Wald ELA, Hendriksen JGM,
Drenthen GS, Kuijk SMJV, Aldenkamp AP, Vles JSH, Vermeulen RJ, Debeij-van Hall
MHJA, Klinkenberg S. Towards a Better Understanding of Cognitive Deficits in
Absence Epilepsy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Neuropsychol Rev.
2019;29(4):421-449.
2. Caplan R., Siddarth P, Stahl L,
Lanphier E, Vona P, Gurbani S, Koh S, Sankar R, Shields W. Childhood absence
epilepsy: Behavioral, cognitive, and linguistic comorbidities. Epilepsia.
2008;49(11):1838–1846.
3. Fonseca
Wald ELA, Klinkenberg S, Voncken TPC, Ebus SCM, Aldenkamp AP, Vles JSH,
Vermeulen RJ, Hendriksen JGM, Debeij-Van Hall MHJA. Cognitive
development in absence epilepsy during long-term follow-up. Child
Neuropsychol. 2019;25(8):1003-1021.
4. Kim E, Shim W, Lee J, Yoon H, Ko T,
Yum M. Altered structural network in newly onset childhood absence epilepsy. Journal
of Clinical Neurology. 2020;16(4):573.
5. Wright IC, Sharma T,
Ellison ZR, McGuire PK, Friston KJ,
Brammer MJ, Murray RM, Bullmore ET. Supra-regional brain systems and
the neuropathology of schizophrenia, Cerebral Cortex. 1999;9(4):366-378.
6. Drenthen
GS, Fonseca Wald EL, Backes WH, Debeij-Van Hall MH, Hendriksen JG, Aldenkamp
AP, Vermeulen RJ, Klinkenberg S, Jansen JF. Lower
myelin‐water content of the frontal lobe in childhood absence epilepsy. Epilepsia.
2019;60(8):1689–1696.
7. Saggar M, Hossein, SMH, Bruno JL,
Quintin EM, Raman MM, Kesler SR, Reiss AL. Estimating individual contribution
from group-based Structural Correlation Networks. NeuroImage.
2015;120:274–284
8. Rubinov M, Sporns O. Complex network
measures of brain connectivitiy: Uses and interpretations. NeuroImage.
2010;52(3):1059-1069.
9. Drenthen GS, Backes WH, Rouhl RPW,
Vlooswijk MCG, Majoie MHJM, Hofman PAM, Aldenkamp AP, Jansen JFA. Structural
covariance networks relate to the severity of epilepsy with focal-onset
seizures. NeuroImage: Clinical. 2018;20:861–867.