Christine S W Law1, Ken A Weber1, Sean Mackey1, and Gary H Glover1
1Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
Synopsis
We present a novel fMRI acquisition that mitigates susceptibility-induced off-resonance and simultaneously captures brainstem, spinal cord, and brain. Brainstem and spinal cord are imaged in high spatial resolution whereas brain resolution is standard. This fMRI acquisition is applied in a noxious pressure-pain experiment from which we observe activation in brain, spinal cord, and brainstem pons & medulla.
Introduction
To thoroughly investigate the
entire central nervous system, high spatial resolution fMRI is crucial for differentiating
brainstem nuclei and spinal cord dorsal and ventral horns. But longer readout duration, required for high
resolution, will worsen off-resonance caused by susceptibility-induced field
gradients. (Fig.1)
We present a novel
fMRI acquisition that mitigates susceptibility-induced off-resonance and
simultaneously captures brainstem, spinal cord, and brain. Brainstem and spinal cord are imaged in high spatial
resolution whereas brain resolution is standard. This fMRI acquisition is applied in a noxious
pressure-pain experiment from which we observe activation in brain, spinal
cord, and brainstem pons & medulla.Background
Brainstem is the critical link between cortical brain regions and spinal
cord. Nuclei in brainstem, for instance,
are relays for transmitting pain signals between spinal cord dorsal horn and various
brain regions: amygdala, thalamus, somatosensory, insular, anterior cingulate, prefrontal
cortices. Similarly to spinal cord, fMRI of brainstem is challenging due to 1) signal loss from susceptibility-induced field
gradients, 2) physiological noise from cardiac & respiratory cycles, 3)
small organ size.Methods
Using a dynamic shimming procedure
previously reported [1], that optimizes linear x, y, z shims and center frequency
per slice, T2*-weighted images are collected by GE 3T Discovery 750 scanner. fMRI sequence parameters: EPI GRAPPA (R=2),
flip angle=80°, FOV for brain/brainstem/spinal cord = 22/8/8cm, matrix=64x64,
readout BW=±125 kHz, TE/TR=30ms/2.5s, #slices=38 (17 brain, 9 brainstem, 12 spinal cord centered at C5), slice thickness/spacing=5/0mm (Fig.2). We use slice-select excitation pulse in brain,
and echo-planar pulse in brainstem & spinal cord slices.
A mechanical pressure pain fMRI experiment
is designed to induce activation in brain, brainstem, and spinal cord. Scan duration is 6 minutes during which thirty
cycles are repeated. Each cycle consists
of 3s on-period and 7s baseline-period. During the on-period, a pneumatically
driven device delivers pressure to subject’s left thumbnail at 5.5kg/cm2.
Cardiac and respiratory data are
collected during scan. High-resolution structural
scans are collected for location reference: T1-weighted brain scan, T2-weighted
brainstem scan at the same slice locations as the fMRI scan, and T2-weighted
spinal cord scan.
Physiological noise is removed from
all images via RETROICOR [2]. Images are
corrected for slice timing and motion. For spinal cord data, mean CSF signal is
removed using custom software. Images
are then spatially smoothed: 5×5×5 mm3 FWHM Gaussian kernel for
brain, 2×2×2mm3 for brainstem, 2×2×5mm3 for spinal cord. Brain images are spatially normalized to
standard MNI152 template space, spinal cord images to PAM50 space.
Activation analysis of
each region (brain, brainstem, spinal
cord) is carried out separately
using FSL FEAT [3]. For each analysis, the
stimulus is modeled by the same task waveform: on-period convolved with a double-gamma
HRF. Temporal derivative of the task
waveform is included in our model to account for possible temporal shifts. Six motion regressors are used to remove their
confounds. For spinal cord analysis,
motion outliers are also modeled as confounds.Results
Brain regions that are related to pain
processing are activated by mechanical pressure pain (Fig.3). Figure 4 shows brainstem activation, their
corresponding axial locations on T2 images, and sagittal locations on a T1
image. Figure 5 shows spinal cord
activation in segment level C6 which receives signal from the thumb.Conclusion
Our mechanical pressure pain fMRI results validate
feasibility of simultaneous brain, high-res brainstem, and high-res spinal cord
neuroimaging.Moving Forward
There are a number of areas that can be
optimized to improve image quality: 1) develop local shim coils to improve
shimming; to further immunize susceptibility-induced signal dropout and distortion,
[4] 2) develop method for co-registration of reduced-FOV brainstem
images to standard template, 3) cardiac or respiratory gated acquisition
to reduce motion in brainstem and spinal cord, 4) shift brainstem slice
center to include cerebellum, then increase field-of-view in brainstem if
necessary to accommodate larger brains. Acknowledgements
R01 NS109450, P41 EB0015891, K24 DA029262References
1. Islam
H, Law CSW, Weber KA, Mackey SC, Glover GH. Dynamic per slice shimming for
simultaneous brain and spinal cord fMRI. Magn Reson Med. 2019
Feb;81(2):825-838. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27388. Epub 2018 Oct 4. PMID: 30284730;
PMCID: PMC6649677.
2. Woolrich,
M. W., Ripley, B. D., Brady, M., & Smith, S. M. (2001). Temporal
Autocorrelation in Univariate Linear Modeling of FMRI Data. NeuroImage, 14(6),
1370–1386. http://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0931
3.
Glover GH, Li TQ, Ress D. Image-based method for retrospective correction of
physiological motion effects in fMRI: RETROICOR. Magn Reson Med
2000;44:162–167.
4. Hsu JJ, Glover GH. Mitigation of susceptibility-induced
signal loss in neuroimaging using localized shim coils. Magn Reson Med. 2005
Feb;53(2):243-8. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20365. Erratum in: Magn Reson Med. 2005
Apr;53(4):992. PMID: 15678531.