Houefa Armelle Lokossou1, Giovanni Rabuffo2, Monique Bernard1, Teodora-Adriana Perles-Barbacaru1, Angèle Viola1, and Christophe Bernard2
1CRMBM UMR 7339, Aix Marseille Université-CNRS, Marseille, France, 2INS, UMR1106, Aix-Marseille University-INSERM-CNRS, Marseille, France
Synopsis
Controlled by the
suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus, circadian rhythm defines the
day-night cycle in most animal species. We evaluated the effect of night and
day cycle on the functional connectome by exploring a group of mice under light
condition (LC) and another one under night condition (NC) using BOLD rs-fMRI.
Our results show a significant increase in functional connectivity in NC group
compared to LC group at the pineal gland level. This result is in line with this
gland’s function. Furthers studies are needed to explore the effects of the
circadian rhythm on both genders at different ages.
Introduction:
In humans but also in rodents, resting state
functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) is used to investigate brain
function at rest. It is known that the activity of most animal species varies
on a 24-h basis controlled by the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus.
Recent study has shown that there is a modulation of neuronal activity due
to circadian rhythm 1. However, to our knowledge there is
no previous work investigating the impact of circadian rhythm on functional
brain connectome in mice. Here, we examined whether functional connectivity
changes during the day-night cycle.Methods:
MRI acquisition: this study
was approved by our institutional committee on Ethics (authorization #26779).
Nine female C57Bl6/J
mice (14 ± 1 months) were studied: 5 in Night Condition (NC) and 4 in Light Condition
(LC). Anesthesia was induced with isoflurane (3-4%) followed by s.c. injection
of Medetor (0.13mg/kg). The
right flank was shaved to facilitate monitoring of the oxygen saturation during
rs-fMRI with an MR compatible mouse oximeter. Animals were scanned on a Pharmascan 70/16 US 7T Brucker system
using Paravison 6 software. Animals in the nocturnal phase were anesthetized
and explored in total darkness. Isoflurane was maintained below 0.6% during BOLD rs-fMRI acquisitions and
body temperature between 33-35°C to prevent awakening. Rs-fMRI was acquired
using a gradient echo EPI sequence: TE/TR/FA=19.91ms/2500ms/45°; 40 interleaved
axial slices, 0.145×0.145×0.4 mm3 spatial resolution, 110 ×110
matrix, 20 dummy scans; 512 repetitions, 22 min total scan duration.
rs-fMRI preprocessing: the data were
converted to nifty using MIPAV script and all the preprocessing was performed using FSL’s
recommended preprocessing pipeline from FMRIB’s Software Library (FSL version 6). Preprocessing included motion correction, outliers
regression using frame displacement (FD) metric 2, registration
to native space, non-brain removal using Brain Extraction Tool (BET), bias
field correction; slice-timing
correction using Fourier-space time-series phase-shifting, grand-mean intensity
normalization of the entire 4D dataset by a single multiplicative factor and
high pass temporal filtering (0.01Hz).
The filtered data were regressed according to the changes in intensity
using the default FSL DVARS 2 metric threshold. Then, global signal regression and low
pass filtering (0.1Hz) were applied and data were registered to Allen template using
FLIRT followed by nonlinear (FNIRT) warping.
Spatial smoothing by a Gaussian kernel and an isotropic resampling
resolution of 4 mm were applied on the preprocessed data during the
multi-session temporal concatenation Independent Component Analysis (ICA) analysis using
Probabilistic ICA 3 as implemented in MELODIC
(Multivariate Exploratory Linear Decomposition into Independent Components)
Version 3.15, part of FSL. The following data pre-processing was applied to the
input data and a total of 40 independent components (IC maps) were extracted
based on a previous work 4.
We used dual regression (DR) (v0.6) for between-subject analysis
allowing voxel-wise comparisons of rs-fMRI data 5,6. Non-parametric permutation based inference analysis 7 was performed with subject-specific component spatial
maps concatenated across subjects and submitted to voxel-wise between-subject
analysis testing for effect of night and day cycle using FSL-randomise 8. FSL’s general linear model (GLM) was used to define design
contrasts based on unpaired t-test, testing circadian condition effect among
the two groups. For each analysis we ran 5000 randomized permutations as
recommended, while threshold-free cluster enhancement (TFCE) 9 was used for statistical inference to validate the
likelihood of extended areas of signal, which also considers information from
neighboring voxels. Correction
for multiple comparisons across space was applied assuming an overall
significance of p < 0.05 using permutation testing and TFCE.
Results:
Of the 40 components derived from group-ICA, 15 were identified as
plausible resting state networks according to the networks reported in the
literature 4,10,11 after discarding components at the brain surface and
those involving vascular structures and ventricles.
Among the interesting ICA components, one appeared statistically
different between the two groups. The cluster was significantly increased in
the group in Night Condition (figure 1).Discussion:
Figure 1 shows the only significant difference found in NC for pineal
gland which is in accordance with its role in the circadian rhythm by the
nighttime secretion of melatonin 12,13. One caveat of this study is
that the animals were disrupted during the diurnal phase (rest phase) because
of the MRI exploration. Another limitation is the small number of exclusively
female animals. The analysis of the effect of the circadian rhythm on both
males and females at different ages is under way.Conclusion:
Our study showed that functional connectivity increases in the pineal
gland during night condition. Our ongoing studies will include more animals and
more time points for a better coverage of the day and night cycle, which could
lead to the identification of other networks depending on the circadian rhythm.Acknowledgements
ANR Connectome (grant ANR-17-CE37-0001-03)
France Life Imaging (grant ANR-11-INBS-0006 from the French “Investissements d’Avenir” program)
References
1. McCauley, J. P. et al.
Circadian Modulation of Neurons and Astrocytes Controls Synaptic Plasticity in
Hippocampal Area CA1. Cell Rep. 33, 108255 (2020).
2. Power, J. D., Barnes, K. A., Snyder, A. Z.,
Schlaggar, B. L. & Petersen, S. E. Spurious but systematic correlations in
functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. NeuroImage
59, 2142–2154 (2012).
3. Beckmann, C. F. & Smith, S. M. Probabilistic
Independent Component Analysis for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. IEEE
Trans. Med. Imaging 23, 137–152 (2004).
4. Bukhari, Q., Schroeter, A., Cole, D. M. &
Rudin, M. Resting State fMRI in Mice Reveals Anesthesia Specific Signatures of
Brain Functional Networks and Their Interactions. Front. Neural Circuits
11, (2017).
5. Filippini, N. et al. Distinct patterns
of brain activity in young carriers of the APOE -ε4 allele. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 7209–7214 (2009).
6. Veer, I. M. Whole brain resting-state
analysis reveals decreased functional connectivity in major depression. Front.
Syst. Neurosci. 4, (2010).
7. Nichols, T. E. & Holmes, A. P.
Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with
examples. Hum. Brain Mapp. 15, 1–25 (2002).
8. Winkler, A. M., Ridgway, G. R., Webster, M.
A., Smith, S. M. & Nichols, T. E. Permutation inference for the general
linear model. NeuroImage 92, 381–397 (2014).
9. Smith, S. & Nichols, T. Threshold-free
cluster enhancement: Addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and
localisation in cluster inference. NeuroImage 44, 83–98 (2009).
10. Bajic, D., Craig, M. M., Mongerson, C. R. L.,
Borsook, D. & Becerra, L. Identifying Rodent Resting-State Brain Networks
with Independent Component Analysis. Front. Neurosci. 11, 685
(2017).
11. Grandjean, J. et al. Common functional
networks in the mouse brain revealed by multi-centre resting-state fMRI
analysis. NeuroImage 205, 116278 (2020).
12. Macchi, M. M. & Bruce, J. N. Human pineal
physiology and functional significance of melatonin. Front. Neuroendocrinol.
25, 177–195 (2004).
13. Sapède, D. & Cau, E. The Pineal Gland from
Development to Function. in Current Topics in Developmental Biology vol.
106 171–215 (Elsevier, 2013).