Emma Brouwer 1, Nikos Priovoulos1, and Wietske van der Zwaag1
1Spinoza Centre for Neuroimaging, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Synopsis
We investigated the
organisation of the cerebellar digit map with three distinct tasks
(flexing/extending/stroking) using B1-shimmed, high-resolution fMRI at 7T. For all tasks, the positions of the COG of
the digit representations formed an orderly progression in at least one of the
lobules. The distance between the motor task activations for flexing and
extending of the digits were smaller than from either motor task to stroking
clusters, indicating a separation between somatosensory and motor clusters in cerebellar
lobule V.
Introduction
The human cerebellum is an important part of the sensory
and motor networks, though largely unexplored compared to the neocortex, due to
its highly-foliated cortex and challenging B1 profile at higher fields. There
is a sensory somatotopic digit map in the anterior and posterior lobules of the
cerebellum1 which has been suggested to overlap with cerebellar motor digit representations2. By comparison, in the primary motor cortex, flexing and extending are known to result in distinct digit maps3. The precise sensory-motor digit organisation in the
cerebellar cortex has not yet been explored in adequate spatial resolution.
Here, we investigated
the organisation of the cerebellar digit map with three distinct tasks
(flexing/extending/stroking) using RF-shimmed, high-resolution fMRI at 7T.Methods
Five
right-handed participants (22-42years) were scanned in a 7T Achieva (Phillips) with
an 8Tx/32Rx (Nova
Medical) whole-head coil. An RF-shim
was calculated following B1 mapping. A 3D-EPI slab covering the cerebellum (1mm
isotropic, TR/TE=3300ms/21ms, SENSEy/z= 2.6/3.27, FOV=182x60x186mm, partial-fouriery/z =0.8,
flip-angle=20°) was used for functional acquisitions. Each session consisted of
three 15-minute functional runs in which right-hand digit 1, 3 or 5 was flexed into
a ball (motor), extended against an elastic band (motor) or stroked with a
toothbrush (sensory); 12s ON and 6s OFF (Fig-1). fMRI data were motion/distortion-corrected, the cerebellum
was segmented and a GLM (finger-stimulus>rest) was fitted (FSL, SPM12 and ANTs). Dominant clusters (p<0.05) in
lobule V and VIII for each of the three tasks and digits were identified by
visual inspection. When the cluster extended into the left hemisphere of the
cerebellum, the zstat threshold was raised to 4 (n=2). For each cluster, the peak
z-stat value and the centre of gravity (COG) and direction of the somatotopic
gradient in the individual space were extracted. A winner-takes-all (WTA) map
was generated for each task and participant. For each participant, the median
distance between COGs of each digit were calculated for each task, as well as
the distance between groups of COGs for the different tasks.Results
Stroking, flexing and extending typically
resulted in individual-digit significant clusters in both lobule V (anterior
lobe) and lobule VIII (posterior lobe) (Fig-2a). The winner takes all (WTA) maps presented all three
digits in a semi-orderly progression, but not in consistent direction, for most
subjects and tasks. While a posterior-anterior (P-A) progression can be seen in Figure 2a in lobule
V for all tasks, a P-A direction is found for flexing in lobule VIII and a superior-inferior (S-I) direction for extending and stroking. Interestingly,
we found consistent bilateral activation in lobule VIII during the extending task
(Fig-2b), but not for flexing or stroking.
In lobule V, during the flexing task,
a consistent organisation in the P-A direction was found in the
COG positions for all participants (Fig-3), though not for extending and
stroking. In lobule VIII, P-A gradients were found for two participants in all tasks
and a left-right gradient for 2/3/3 participants for flexing, extending and stroking
respectively. The S-I gradient was inconsistent for all participants and tasks.
The distinct tasks
resulted in separated series of COGs within the same lobules. Median distances
between digit COGs were largest for the flexing task (Fig-4a). Between task
groups, the largest distances were found between the two motor and stroking task
in lobule V (Fig-4b). In lobule VIII, groups of COGs were closer together. Discussion
All three tasks reliably engaged the cerebellar motor regions in lobule V and VIII
at single-digit level. More consistently organised activation in lobule V and
larger distances between tasks compared to lobule VIII indicate that the digit
regions cover more cortical surface in the anterior lobe, though both regions
demonstrated digit maps.
The flexing and stroking tasks showed mostly unilateral results. In comparison,
the extending task resulted in bilateral clusters. This could be due to the higher
complexity of the task, as more difficult movements have been shown to yield
more bilateral activation in M14.
Larger distances between the stroking task and the two motor tasks could
potentially indicate a separation between motor and sensory organisation in the
cerebellum similar the neocortex, where distinct sensory (S1) and motor digit
maps (M1) exist3. A separation between flexing and extending,
as has been reported in M13, was not apparent in this cerebellar data,
though flexing demonstrated a more distinct digit progression compared to extending.
With the current 1mm spatial resolution, individual digit representations could
be distinguished, but areas responding to different tasks were close and
overlapping. To
further investigate the intralobular organisation of lobule VIII, a higher
spatial resolution and/or surface-based approaches might be required.Conclusion
To conclude, we employed an
RF-shimmed high-resolution 7T fMRI acquisition to demonstrate that digit-maps
exist both in the anterior (Lobule V) and posterior (Lobule VIII) part of the
cerebellum, across motor and sensory tasks. We found a separation between motor
and sensory digit maps, indicating a similar organisation to the neocortex. Acknowledgements
This study was supported by an NWO TTW VIDI grant (VI.Vidi.198.016)References
1.Van der Zwaag
W, Kusters R, Magill A, et al. Digit somatotopy in the human cerebellum: A 7T
fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2013;67:354-362.
doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.041
2.Wiestler T,
McGonigle DJ, Diedrichsen J. Integration of sensory and motor representations
of single fingers in the human cerebellum. J Neurophysiol.
2011;105(6):3042-3053. doi:10.1152/JN.00106.2011
3.Huber L, Finn
ES, Handwerker DA, et al. Sub-millimeter fMRI reveals multiple topographical
digit representations that form action maps in human motor cortex. Neuroimage.
2020;208:116463. doi:10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2019.116463
4.Chettouf S,
Rueda-Delgado LM, de Vries R, Ritter P, Daffertshofer A. Are unimanual
movements bilateral? Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020;113:39-50.
doi:10.1016/J.NEUBIOREV.2020.03.002