Stephen G Jermy1,2, Elizabeth M Tunnicliffe3, Ntobeko A B Ntusi2,4, and Ernesta M Meintjes1,2
1Division of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Human Biology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa, 2Cape Universities Body Imaging Centre (CUBIC), University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa, 3Oxford Centre for Magnetic Resonance Research (OCMR), Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 4Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
Synopsis
A prospective
respiratory motion correction control system, capable of slice-following, was tested
on a 3 T clinical MRI scanner. The performance of the control system was compared
against the most common respiratory motion compensation technique, namely multiple
breath-holds. Both techniques produced similarly consistent results. The control
system technique was able to reduce the acquisition time by acquiring data with
100% respiratory efficiency
Introduction
Cardiovascular
diffusion tensor imaging (cDTI) has emerged as a technique for investigating
the micro-architecture and orientation of the myocardium1. Its
clinical utility has been somewhat impeded by long scan times and the common
practice of performing cDTI under breath-hold (BH) conditions. To improve the
clinical utility of cDTI, a control system (CS) was implemented in a free breathing
cDTI sequence to perform in vivo slice tracking with 100% respiratory
efficiency2. The sequence was tested on a clinical MRI scanner with
standard gradients (45mT/m).Methods
Briefly,
the CS method uses a series of 90°-180° crossed-pair navigators to repeatedly
measure the position of the diaphragm during non-imaging segments. This is used
as an input to a control system, which then predicts the diaphragm position and
prospectively corrects the slice position during imaging segments (Figure 1). The slice position is
computed assuming a linear factor between diaphragm and heart displacement3.
Six
healthy volunteers underwent cDTI using a 3 T Skyra (Siemens, Erlangen,
Germany). Subjects were scanned using an ECG-gated second-order motion
compensated spin echo (M2SE) sequence with two different respiratory motion
compensation techniques – multiple BH and free breathing (FB) using the CS. For
both techniques, diffusion weighted images (DWI) were acquired using b-values
of 50 and 450s/mm2 with 12 diffusion directions and 5 repetitions. The
order in which the FB and BH scans, and b-values, were acquired was randomised
for each subject. Scan parameters: TR/TE – 1 R-R/86ms; matrix size – 136x50; pixel
size – 2.57x2.57mm2 (interpolated: 1.29x1.29mm2);
slice thickness – 8mm; bandwidth – 2298Hz/pixel; GRAPPA – 2. Cine imaging was
used to position three short axis slices in the basal, mid, and apical regions
of the heart and optimise the trigger delay to acquire the DWI in late systole.
All image
analysis and diffusion tensor calculations were computed offline using a set of
in-house MATLAB tools4 (Mathworks,
Natick, USA). Image registration using affine transformations, heart-rate
correction, and repetition averaging were performed. The mean diffusivity
(MD), fractional anisotropy (FA), helix angle (HA), and secondary eigenvector
angle (E2A) were calculated voxelwise from the diffusion tensor for the entire
myocardium. All
statistical analyses were performed with SPSS v27 using a multifactor ANOVA corrected
for repeated measurements.Results
Each set of 12 DWIs were collected in single breath-hold acquisitions of
approximately 15 seconds for a total of 30 breath-holds, approximately 20
minutes including short breaks between scans. For the CS, all DWIs were
collected in one continuous scan per slice under free-breathing conditions and
completed in approximately 15 minutes including pre-training time3.
There were
no significant differences found between the two respiratory motion
compensation techniques for MD, FA, E2A, or HA (Figures 2 and 3).Discussion and Conclusion
The M2SE
cDTI sequence was implemented on a 3 T clinical scanner using a prospective
motion correction control system.
The
results of the diffusion parameters were similar to previously published
results. The BH and CS techniques produced very similar results with no significant
differences (Figure 4).
These results
show that the prospective respiratory motion correction control system
technique can play a part in improving the clinical viability of cDTI, allowing
for the reduction of exam times, enabling long exams to be performed under
free-breathing conditions, as well as opening the door to performing
multi-slice acquisitions and increasing the number of diffusion directions.Acknowledgements
NRF/RCUK Newton Fund collaboration between the University of Oxford and the University of Cape Town
NRF/DST South African Research Chairs Initiative
E.M. Tunnicliffe is funded by the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
References
1. Mekkaoui,
C., Reese, T. G., et al. (2017). Diffusion MRI in the heart. NMR in
Biomedicine, 30(3).
2. Jermy,
S. G., Hess, A. T., et al. (2019). Towards robust free-breathing cardiac DTI. Proceedings
of the ISMRM, 27, p.228.
3. Burger,
I. H., Keegan, J., et al. (2010). Prospective diaphragm position prediction for
Cardiac MR using multiple navigators. Proceedings of the ISMRM, 18, p.5013.
4. Tunnicliffe, E. M., Scott, A. D., et al. (2014).
Intercentre reproducibility of cardiac apparent diffusion coefficient and
fractional anisotropy in healthy volunteers. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic
Resonance, 16(1), 1–12.