Laurel Dieckhaus1, Ali Kamali1, Emily C Peters2, Collin A Preszler1, Christa M Sonderer1, Paulo Pires2, Kaveh Laksari1, and Elizabeth B Hutchinson1
1Biomedical Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States, 2Physiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
Synopsis
To examine the first hours after brain injury, we utilized photoacoustic imaging (PAI), ultrasound (US), and color doppler (CD) alongside MRI metrics. We wanted to investigate the early pathomechanisms that involve hemodynamic response such as blood flow, oxygenation, and edema.
Introduction
The first hours after brain
injury are a critical period during which pathomechanisms evolve and give rise
to secondary outcomes that will determine the ultimate outcomes of degeneration
and recovery. At the center of this time course are hemodynamic changes including
decreased blood flow and tissue oxygenation that can be transient or associated
with cell damage and loss. While these cerebrovascular pathomechanisms are
critical, they remain poorly understood in the hyperacute period after injury1.
Non-invasive imaging in animal models of traumatic brain injury and hemorrhage plays
an important role in determining the pathomechanisms. Recently, advances in
imaging technology such as photoacoustic imaging
(PAI) and ultrasound (US) for brain
applications offer the ability to capture this acute time period for us to
better understand and study early pathological mechanisms2. MRI
metrics such as Arterial Spin Labelling (ASL) allow us to measure cerebral
blood flow (CBF), diffusivity, which measures water restriction that is
associated with edema, and T2 all offer important information about disease
pathology. Additionally, PAI measures percent of oxygenation saturation, an important
metric that usually requires invasive techniques3 to quantify along
with color doppler (CD), which quantifies blood flow velocity.
In our study, we set out to combine
metrics from MRI, PAI, CD, and ultrasound (US) to better understand hemodynamic
injury which is characterized by oxygenation, blood flow, and edema. We implemented
this multi-modality experimental design in mice utilizing 2 different injury
schemes, Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and Sub-arachnoid Hemorrhage (SAH).Methods
Baseline scans were acquired prior to injury on both the MRI
and PAI/CD/US equipment. Our PAI/CD/US battery was composed of a structural
image of the brain, B mode, followed by CD and then PAI for oxygenation. All
PAI, CD, and US were obtained at 0.15mm intervals across the entire brain (approximately
99 slices). The MRI battery was composed of Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)
acquired using Echo Planar Imaging (EPI) (b values 800-1600 s/mm2,60
directions; 250x250x400 micron resolution), T2 along
with ASL (which we use to obtain CBF or blood water; 281x281x1000 micron). Following
baselines, we induced either a TBI using controlled cortical impact (CCI) or SAH
using a previously established endovascular perforation model. TBI-sham mice
were placed on stereotaxic frame but did not receive CCI and SAH-sham mice
underwent occlusion of the carotid but no advancement of the filament to induce
hemorrhage. Each group had 6 mice (3 male and 3 female). PAI/CD/US scans were collected 15 minutes
after injury, followed by MRI scans collected at 90 minutes, and then PAI/CD/US
scans again at the 3-hour time point. Animals were kept consistently on
isoflurane anesthesia and 50-50 O2 medical air mixture for the entire duration
of experiments.
All data from both modalities were manually segmented to separate
brain from skull and were separated into 2 hemispheres, ipsilateral and
contralateral. Extents of injury for were manually drawn for MRI T2 and diffusivity
maps such as Trace (TR). Scan types that collected only 3 slices in the brain,
such as ASL were averaged for analysis. MRI data was processed using University
of Arizona’s high performance computing cores which included TORTOISE3,4,5
for DTI. PAI/CD/US scans were processed
utilizing VEVO6 imaging analysis software.
For statistical analysis, we performed repeated measure analysis
of variance (ANOVA) alongside post-hoc
Tukey-Kramer test.Results
Line plots of TBI and TBI-sham
ipsilateral oxygenation showed significant difference from baseline compared to
15 minute and the 3-hour post-injury. A similar trend was also observed for SAH
and SAH-sham. Ipsilateral VVF was significantly different from baseline for TBI
at 15 minutes and 3 hours post-injury but was not observed in TBI-sham. Both
SAH and SAH-sham had a significant difference in VVF from baseline to the other
2 post-injury time points. No significant difference was observed when
comparing CBF on the ipsilateral side of TBI or TBI-sham. This is in stark
contrast to what we observed in SAH and SAH-sham, which both had significant
difference in CBF value from baseline. Hyperintensities were observed in T2 while
hypo intensities were observed in TR for both injury types. Extent of injury
location for T2 and TR maps differed in both injury types. We observed smaller
extent of TR compared to T2. Discussion
Multi-modal assessment of blood
flow, oxygenation and edema were combined to assess the first hours following TBI
or hemorrhage. For all metrics assessed the SAH model produce far more prominent
outcomes. Both ASL and CD/US demonstrated reduced blood flow for both TBI and
SAH models and Oxygenation was also significantly
reduced in both injury models at 15 minutes and 3 hours after injury. Diffusivity
was found in both models to be far less extensive than ASL or sO2 reductions
suggesting differential outcomes for tissue with the same level of blood flow
or oxygenation levels acutely. In the TBI model, the extent of reduced diffusivity
was very small and T2 hyperintensities were found to be more extensive in
volume. Conclusions
We successfully were able to investigate
oxygenation, CBF, and edema which are all important facets involved in
vasculature injury. The characterization of differences between TBI and SAH models
was made more rigorous by the multi-model assessment using PAI, CD, US, and MRI
across the whole mouse brain. Acknowledgements
All imaging was performed in the UA translational bioimaging
resource (TBIR) and made possible by the NIH small instrumentation grant: S10
OD025016. References
1. W Tong , P Zheng , J Xu, Y Guo, J Zeng, W Yang, et al. Early
CT signs of progressive hemorrhagic injury following acute traumatic brain
injury. Neuroradiology. 2011 May;53(5).
2. P Yushkevich, J Piven, H Hazlett, R Smith, S Ho, J Gee, and
G Gerig. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures:
Significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 2006 Jul
1;31(3):1116-28.
3. C.Pierpaoli, L.Walker, M.O.Irfanoglu, A.Barnett, P.Basser,
L-C. Chang, C.Koay, S.Pajevic, G.Rohde, J.Sarlls,
and M. Wu. TORTOISE: an integrated software package for processing of diffusion
MRI data. ISMRM 18th annual meeting,Stockholm,Sweden,
2010; #1597.
4. M. O. Irfanoglu,
A. Nayak, J. Jenkins, and C. Pierpaoli.
TORTOISEv3:Improvements and
New Features of the NIH Diffusion MRI Processing Pipeline, ISMRM 25th annual
meeting, Honolulu, HI, abstract #3540
5. M.O. Irfanoglu,
P. Modi, A. Nayak, E. B. Hutchinson, J. Sarlls,
C. Pierpaoli.
DR-BUDDI (Diffeomorphic Registration for Blip-Up blip-Down
Diffusion Imaging) method for correcting echo planar imaging distortions,
Neuroimage. 2015 Feb 1;106:284-99. doi:
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.042. Epub 2014
Nov 26
6. Vevo 3100 Preclinical Imaging System, FUJIFILM VisualSonics;
https://www.visualsonics.com/product/imaging-systems/vevo-3100.