Michela Fratini1, Laura Maugeri2, Maria Guidi3, Mauro Di Nuzzo4, Marta Moraschi5, Fabio Mangini6, Irene Egidi3, Daniele Mascali4, Valerio Pisani6, Ugo Nocentini6, and Federico Giove4
1CNR- Nanotec, Roma, Italy, 2CNR- Nanotec, Lecce, Italy, 3Enrico Fermi Reserch Centre, Rome, Italy, 4CREF-Centro Fermi, Roma, Italy, 5campus biomedico, Roma, Italy, 6fondazione Santa Lucia, Roma, Italy
Synopsis
Functional Magnetic
Resonance Imaging (fMRI) has become one of the most powerful tools in
neuroscience research, with promising applications in clinical practice.
Particularly, fMRI
based on blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) contrast has gained a primary
role in the study of human brain and spinal cord, for the characterization of
normal and pathological brain/spinal cord (SC) activity. In this framework, we
have studied and report the characterization of the functional response of the SC
to a multilevel motor task, designed to assess the linearity of the hemodynamic
response as a function of the intensity of a graded task.
Introduction
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging techniques based
on the Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent (BOLD) signal are well established for
the indirect study of the neuronal activity in the brain and spinal cord. Recently, studies on
the task-dependent modulation of the SC fMRI activations signal in response to
innocuous and painful sensory stimuli or motor tasks have been performed, and
an hemodynamic response function (hrf) specific for the SC has been proposed1.
It has been shown that there is a linear relationship between the applied force
and the BOLD signal amplitude during isometric exercis2, and that
there is also a movement rate-dependent increase in spinal fMRI signals3.
All these studies have shown that spinal BOLD fMRI has the potential for
becoming a reliable and sensitive tool for studying the modulation of
functional activity in the SC.
SC fMRI may be of immediate application in
neuroradiology, because a non-invasive tool capable of monitoring the function,
and thus complementing the available anatomical information, is a crucial need
in these fields.
Preliminary studies of people with spinal cord
injuries and multiple sclerosis (MS)
have demonstrated an altered activity in the SC, depending on the injury
severity or the advancement of the disease4-8. In this framework we study
and report the characterization of the functional response of the human SC to a
multilevel motor task, designed to assess the linearity of the hemodynamic
response as a function of the intensity of a graded task in healthy subjects
and in multiple sclerosis patients.Methods
Acquisitions were performed on 45 healthy subjects,
and 22 patients with multiple sclerosis employing a Philips Achieva 3 T MR
scanner (Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands), equipped with a
neurovascular coil array. fMRI data were acquired using a GRE-EPI sequence
along axial directions, with the following parameters: TE/TR = 25/3000 ms, Flip
angle = 80°, FOV = 140x140x143 mm3, acquisition matrix = 96x96x34,
resolution giving a voxel size of= 1.5x1.5x3 mm3. Order of axial runs
was randomized between subjects.
Anatomical reference images were acquired using 3D T1-weighted
gradient echo sequence (TE/TR = 5.89/9.59 ms, flip angle = 9°, FOV =
240x240x192 mm3, resolution = 0.75x0.75x1.5mm3). During all functional runs,
Heart beat and pulse and respiration data were recorded using scanner
integrated plethysmograph and respiratory belt during all functional runs.
The acquisition protocol consisted in five epochs,
each of them divided in task execution and resting state. Task execution
requested to apply a given level of force, randomly selected among 20%, 40% or
50% of the total maximum sustainable voluntary contraction force (MSF), to the
stimulation device.
Immediately before the fMRI session, subjects
underwent a training phase with the stimulation device outside the MR scanner.
In a first trial, the MSF was determined. Subject were asked to press the
device up to their maximum sustainable force, and to keep the force for 30s.
Then, subjects were trained to perform the task.
We also implemented and optimized a scfMRI
preprocessing and data analysis pipeline, built around the Spinal Cord Toolbox
(SCT)9.
The statistical analysis approaches to study the
linear relationship, is based on a standard SC hemodynamic function response1. Results & Discussion
In figure 1 we compare the activation
maps in the PAM50 template space of a control with respect to a patient. The active
voxels in axial images are more consistent with grey matter activation.
The longitudinal level of the
activation is C3/C4. As expected, the functional activation is only found in
ipsilateral spinal cord. We found that the activation is more intense in the
patients.
In figure 2 we report the mean
BOLD change as a function of the grip strength in the patients and in the
control subjects. The results obtained suggest a non parametric dependence of
functional response in the spinal cord on the stimulation strength in an
isometric motor task in the case of the patientsConclusions
In the case of patients, by studying the BOLD signal
as a function of force, a statistically linear trend of activation with respect
to force was not obtained: their ratio is practically constant.
Overall,
the present work provides an optimized methodological tool for advancing fMRI
applied to the spinal cord in basic research, and towards applications in
clinical practiceAcknowledgements
The FISR Project “Tecnopolo di nanotecnologia e fotonica per la medicina di precisione” (funded by MIUR/CNR, CUP B83B17000010001), the TECNOMED project(funded by Regione Puglia, CUP B84I18000540002).References
1. Giulietti, G., et al., Neuroimage, 2008. 42(2): p. 626-634.
2. Madi, S., et al., American journal of neuroradiology,
2001. 22(9): p. 1768-1774.
3. Maieron, M., et al., The Journal of neuroscience, 2007. 27(15):
p. 4182-4190.
4. Agosta, F., et al., Neuroimage, 2008. 39(4): p. 1542-1548.
5. Agosta, F., et al., Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine, 2008. 59(5): p. 1035-1042.
6. Kornelsen, J. and P. Stroman. Spinal Cord, 2007. 45(7):
p. 485-490.
7. Valsasina, P., et al., Journal of Neurology,
Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 2010. 81(4): p. 405-408. 162
8. Wheeler-Kingshott, C., et al., Neuroimage,
2014. 84: p. 1082-1093.
9.De Leener B, Levy S, Dupont SM, Fonov VS, Stikov N, Louis Collins D et al. Neuroimage 2017; 145(Pt A): 24-43.