Sarah M Schwartz1, Lexiaozi Fan1, Bradley D Allen1, Jeremy D Collins2, Kyungpyo Hong1, James C Carr1, Brandon Benefield1,3, Amit R Patel4, Daniel Kim1, and Daniel C Lee1,3
1Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States, 2Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States, 3Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States, 4Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
Synopsis
This study evaluates visual scores of image quality (conspicuity,
artifact, noise; Likert scale 1[worst]-5[best], 3 acceptable) produced by a wideband
cardiac perfusion sequence in patients with CIED and a standard sequence in
matching non-device patients in the setting of vasodilated stress perfusion
imaging. The median conspicuity scores were not significantly different between
wideband (4) and standard (4). While the median artifact score was
significantly worse for wideband (4) than standard (5), it was above the
acceptable cutoff. The median noise score was significantly better for wideband
than standard. Our wideband perfusion sequence produces diagnostically
acceptable image quality in CIED patients.
Introduction
Over 3 million patients in the United States have a cardiac
implantable electronic device (CIED); there is an increasing rate of
implantation secondary to an aging population and increasing evidence of symptomatic
and mortality benefits from CIEDs [1-2]. CIED patients often require diagnostic
imaging to investigate the cause of new cardiac symptoms. Due to underlying and
often complex heart disease CIED patients are likely to benefit from stress
perfusion MRI which offers a comprehensive examination of function, myocardial
ischemia, and scarring. Previously, image quality was significantly hindered by
CIEDs. However, a recent study demonstrated that a wideband cardiac perfusion
pulse sequence effectively suppresses image artifacts associated with a CIED at
rest [3]. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the image quality of a wideband
cardiac perfusion sequence in CIED patients undergoing vasodilated stress perfusion
imaging in comparison to a standard cardiac perfusion pulse sequence in
matching non-device patients.Methods
We retrospectively identified 19 consecutive patients with a
CIED who had undergone cardiac stress perfusion imaging with the previously
described accelerated wideband pulse sequence [3]. We identified 19 matching controls
from a database of non-device patients who had underwent clinical cardiac stress
perfusion MRI. We chose controls based on gender, age, BMI, LVEF, and when
possible, CAD and diabetes (Figure 1). Both wideband and standard stress
perfusion MRI scans were done on a 1.5 T scanner (Siemens, Avanto) using
identical adenosine and gadolinium dose protocols. Two clinical raters (4-20 years
of experience) independently evaluated the image quality in three categories on
a 5-point Likert scale (1: worst, 3: acceptable, 5: best): conspicuity of the
myocardial wall enhancement, image artifact of the heart region, and noise
throughout the image. The two raters were given training datasets to calibrate
their scores together prior to independent reads. Each rater provided a
composite score for all slices. Inter-rater reproducibility was calculated
using Cohen’s kappa coefficient [4]. For statistical analysis, the rater scores
for patients with a CIED and non-device patients were compared using the
Mann-Whitney’s test. Description of Results
Figure 2 shows a comparison of image quality between
wideband and standard pulse sequences at stress and rest. As summarized in Figure 3, the median conspicuity, artifact, and noise scores were 4 for wideband
at stress and rest; median conspicuity, artifact, and noise scores ranged from
3 to 5 for standard at stress and rest. In two CIED patients, artifact scores
were less than 3 (non-diagnostic) at both stress and rest. As shown in Figure 4, one CIED patient with artifact scores below 3 had large signal voids in the
anterior wall due to the proximity of CIED to the heart (see chest X-ray).
Using the Mann-Whitney’s test, the median conspicuity score
was not significantly different between wideband and standard at stress or rest
(p = 0.269 and 0.238, respectively). The median artifact score was significantly
worse for wideband than standard at stress and rest (p < 0.001, p <
0.001, respectively), but both were above the acceptable cutoff. The median
noise score was significantly better for wideband than standard at stress and
rest (p = 0.01 and 0.018, respectively).
Using Cohan’s kappa coefficient, there was moderate
inter-rater agreement (k=0.595, 95% CI, 0.507 to 0.6832).Conclusions
This study demonstrates that an accelerated wideband cardiac
perfusion sequence produces diagnostically acceptable image quality in CIED
patients in the context of stress testing. It shows that image quality of an
accelerated wideband cardiac perfusion sequence in patients with a CIED is similar
to a standard cardiac perfusion sequence in non-device patients. In all image
quality categories, the median score was 4 for wideband, supporting its
clinical use in patients with a CIED. Future possible studies include
quantification of myocardial blood flow, regional analysis of image quality,
and additional strategies to eliminate residual image artifacts.Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by the following grants: National Institutes of Health (R01HL116895, R01HL138578, R21EB024315, R21AG055954, R01HL151079, R21EB030806) and American Heart Association (19IPLOI34760317).References
[1] Greenspon, A.J., et al., Trends
in permanent pacemaker implantation in the United States from 1993 to 2009:
increasing complexity of patients and procedures. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2012. 60(16): p. 1540-5.
[2] Bradshaw PJ, Stobie P, Knuiman MW, Briffa TG,
Hobbs MS. Trends in the incidence and prevalence of cardiac pacemaker
insertions in an ageing population. Open Heart. 2014 Dec 10;1(1):e000177. doi:
10.1136/openhrt-2014-000177. PMID: 25512875; PMCID: PMC4265147.
[3] Hong K, Collins JD, Freed BH, Fan L, Arai AE, Hsu LY, Lee DC,
Kim D. Accelerated Wideband Myocardial Perfusion Pulse Sequence with Compressed
Sensing Reconstruction for Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification in Patients
with a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2020
Apr 16;2(2):e190114. doi: 10.1148/ryct.2020190114. PMID: 32420548; PMCID:
PMC7207204.
[4] Cohen,
J., A Coefficient of Agreement for
Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1960. 20(1): p. 37-46.