Alexandra F Bonthrone1, Andrew Chew1, Megan Ní Bhroin1,2, Christopher J Kelly1, Daan Christiaens1,3, Maximilian Pietsch1,4, J-Donald Tournier1, Lucilio Cordero-Grande1,5, Joseph V Hajnal1,6, Kuberan Pushparajah6,7, John Simpson7, A David Edwards1, Mary A Rutherford1, Chiara Nosarti1,8, Dafnis Batalle1,4, and Serena J Counsell1
1Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom, 2Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems Group, Discipline of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland, 3Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT/PSI), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, 4Department for Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom, 5Biomedical Image Technologies, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid & CIBER-BBN, Madrid, Spain, 6Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom, 7Paediatric Cardiology Department, Evelina London Children's Healthcare, London, United Kingdom, 8Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
Synopsis
Infants with Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) are at
increased risk of neurodevelopmental impairments. Forty-three neonates with CHD
underwent multi-shell high
angular resolution diffusion MRI (HARDI) on a 3T scanner before surgery.
At 22 months parents completed a questionnaire characterising internalizing and
externalizing behaviours. Network-based statistics were used to characterise
the relationship between internalizing and externalizing symptoms and
structural connectivity. Reduced neonatal structural connectivity in
fronto-limbic regions before surgery was associated with increased
externalizing symptomatology in toddlers with CHD.
Introduction
Infants
with Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) are at risk of impaired neurodevelopment,
the origins of which are not well understood1. The aim of this study
was to characterise the relationship between neonatal structural connectivity soon
after birth and behavioural outcomes at 22 months.Methods
Forty-three
infants [21 male; median (range) gestational age at birth = 38.57 (34.86-41.57)
weeks; postmenstrual age at scan median (range) = 39.29 (36.43-41.86) weeks]
with serious or critical CHD (summarised in Table 1) underwent brain MRI before
surgery on a Phillips Achieva 3T scanner situated on the neonatal unit at St
Thomas’ Hospital, London. High
angular resolution diffusion MRI (HARDI)2 was acquired
for all infants (TR/TE 3.8s/90ms, b = 0s/mm2
(n = 20), b = 400s/mm2 (n = 64),
b = 1000s/mm2 (n = 88), b = 2600s/mm2
(n = 128), multiband factor = 4, resolution:
1.5 × 1.5 × 3mm with 1.5mm slice overlap with interleaved
phase encoding, reconstructed voxel size 1.5mm isotropic). HARDI data underwent denoising3,
Gibbs ringing suppression4, and correction for motion and image
distortion using spherical harmonics and radial decomposition (SHARD)5.
To assess network
organisation, we constructed structural connectivity networks for each infant
using a neonatal adaptation6 of the automated anatomical labelling
atlas7 as nodes and SIFT2 weights8 of streamlines
generated in MRtrix39 connecting each region as edges.
We calculated global network features (global
network density, average strength, global efficiency, and local efficiency)
using the Brain Connectivity Toolbox (BCT)10. Edge-wise associations
between structural connectivity and behavioural scores was
assessed using the network-based statistics (NBS) toolbox11. The
t-statistic threshold was set at 3.1 where connections exceeding this value
were considered significant. NBS results are dependent on t-statistic
threshold, so analyses were rerun at t = 2.5–3.5.
Infants
underwent a neurodevelopmental assessment at a median 22.1 months (range
20.3-37.2) corrected age. Cognitive abilities were assessed with the
Bayley-Scales of Infant and Toddler Development 3rd Edition. Parents
completed the Child Behaviour Checklist 1.5-5 years questionnaire and internalizing and externalizing scores were calculated (higher scores indicate
increased symptomatology). The index
of multiple deprivation (IMD) was calculated from postcode at birth for each infant as a
measure of socioeconomic status. It was not possible to calculate IMD for one
infant with CHD.
Partial
Spearman’s rank correlations were used to assess the association between global
network features and internalizing and externalizing scores covarying for postmenstrual
age at scan, gestational age at birth, sex, brain injury severity, cognitive
composite score and IMD. P-values underwent false discovery rate correction and
were reported as pFDR.
For the NBS analysis, general linear models were
generated to test for positive and negative relationships between internalizing
and externalizing scores and structural connectivity controlling for sex,
gestational age at birth, postmenstrual age at scan, brain injury severity,
cognitive composite score and index of multiple deprivation. Models were run with 10,000
permutations and controlled the family-wise error rate (significance threshold
set at p< 0.025).Results
NBS revealed a fronto-limbic network
of 26 nodes sharing 29 edges (Table 2) where reduced connectivity was
associated with higher externalizing scores in infants with CHD (Figure 1). No
networks with significantly increased connectivity were associated with higher externalizing
scores. No networks were associated with internalizing scores. There were also
no significant associations between global network features and
internalizing or externalizing scores (Table 3).
Table 2 lists edges negatively
associated with externalizing scores and the associated t-statistic at a
threshold of t=3.1. Sensitivity analysis revealed no significant
networks at t=2.5-2.8. Significant edges were identified in the fronto-limbic
network at t=2.9-3.5.Discussion
Young
children with CHD are at increased risk of both internalizing and externalizing
behaviour problems12. This study provides evidence that altered neonatal
structural connectivity in a fronto-limbic subnetwork before surgery is
associated with increased externalizing symptoms in toddlers with CHD.
Corticolimbic
networks are implicated in internalizing and externalizing symptoms across
childhood13. Lower clustering coefficient in the right amygdala during
the neonatal period has been associated with increased internalizing and externalizing
symptoms at two years in healthy infants14. In healthy children and
adolescents, externalizing symptoms have been linked to structure and function within
amygdala-orbitofrontal circuitry15,16,17. Taken together, these data
point to the importance of fronto-limbic circuitry in the development of externalizing
behaviours across childhood.Conclusions
Reduced
structural connectivity in a fronto-limbic network at birth may underlie externalizing
symptoms in children with CHD.Acknowledgements
This
work was supported by the Medical Research Council UK (MR/L011530/1 and MR/V002465/1), the British Heart Foundation
(FS/15/55/31649), and Action Medical Research (GN2630). This research was
supported by core funding from the Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Medical
Engineering (WT 203148/Z/16/Z), MRC strategic grant (MR/K006355/1), Medical
Research Council Centre grant (MR/N026063/1), and by the National Institute for
Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy’s and St Thomas’
NHS Foundation Trust and Kings College London. The views expressed are those of
the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department
of Health and social care. DC is supported by the Flemish Research Foundation
(FWO; grant number 12ZV420N). MP is funded in part by the Bill & Melinda
Gates Foundation (INV-005774).References
1. Marino BS, Lipkin PH, Newburger JW et al. Neurodevelopmental
outcomes in children with congenital heart disease: evaluation and management:
a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2012;
126: 1143–72.
2. Hutter
J, Tournier J-D, Price AN, et al. Time-efficient and flexible design of
optimized multishell HARDI diffusion: Time-Efficient Flexible dMRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2018;79(3):1276–1292.
3.
Cordero-Grande
L, Christiaens D, Hutter J, et al. Complex diffusion-weighted image estimation
via matrix recovery under general noise models. NeuroImage 2019;
200: 391–404.
4. Kellner E, Dhital B, Kiselev VG, et al. Gibbs-ringing
artifact removal based on local subvoxel-shifts: Gibbs-Ringing Artifact
Removal. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
2016; 76(5): 1574–1581.
5. Christiaens D, Cordero-Grande L, Pietsch M et al. Scattered
slice SHARD reconstruction for motion correction in multi-shell diffusion MRI.
Neuroimage. 2021; 225:117437.
6.
Shi F, Yap P-T, Wu G, et
al. Infant Brain Atlases from Neonates to 1- and 2-Year-Olds. PLoS One. 2011;6.
7. Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau
B, Papathanassiou D, et al. Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM
Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject
Brain. NeuroImage. 2002;15(1):273–289.
8. Smith
RE, Tournier J-D, Calamante F, et al. SIFT2: Enabling dense quantitative
assessment of brain white matter connectivity using streamlines tractography. NeuroImage. 2015; 119: 338–351.
9.
Tournier
J-D, Smith R, Raffelt D, et al. MRtrix3: A fast, flexible and open software
framework for medical image processing and visualisation. NeuroImage. 2019; 202: 116137.
10. Rubinov M, Sporns O. Complex network
measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations. NeuroImage. 2010;52(3):1059–1069.
11. Zalesky A, Fornito A, Bullmore ET.
Network-based statistic: Identifying differences in brain networks. NeuroImage. 2010;53(4):1197–1207.
12. Clancy T, Jordan B, de Weerth C, et al. Early Emotional,
Behavioural and Social Development of Infants and Young Children with
Congenital Heart Disease: A Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Psychology
in Medical Settings. 2020; 27: 686-703.
13. Tucker DM, Poulsen C, Luu P. Critical periods for the
neurodevelopmental processes of externalizing and internalizing. Development
and Psychopathology. 2015; 27(2):321-46.
14. Wee C-Y, Tuan TA, Broekman BFP et al. Neonatal neural
networks predict children behavioral profiles later in life. Hum Brain Mapp.
2017; 38(3): 1362-1373.
15. Ameis SH, Ducharme S, Albaugh MD, et al. Cortical Thickness,
Cortico-Amygdalar Networks, and Externalizing Behaviors in Healthy Children.
Biological Psychiatry. 2014; 75(1): 65-72.
16. Thijssen S, Collins PF, Weiss H, et al. The longitudinal
association between externalizing behavior and frontoamygdalar resting‐state
functional connectivity in late adolescence and young adulthood. J Child
Psychol Pyschiatry. 2021; 62(7): 857-867.
17. Andre QR, Geeraert BL, Lebel C. Brain structure and
internalizing and externalizing behavior in typically developing children and
adolescents. Brain Structure and Function. 2020; 225: 1369-1378.
18. Ni Bhroin M, Abo Seada
S, Bonthrone AF, et al. Reduced structural connectivity in
cortico-striatal-thalamic network in neonates with congenital heart disease.
Neuroimage Clinical. 2020; 28: 102423.