Andreas Reichert1, Samantha Hickey1, Johannes Fischer1, Michael Vogele2, Simon Reiss1, and Michael Bock1
1Dept. of Radiology, Medical Physics, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany, 2Interventional Systems GmbH, Kitzbuehel, Austria
Synopsis
A real-time
sequence is presented with automatic adjustment of the imaging plane parallel
to a needle. The sequence utilizes the phase-only cross correlation (POCC)
algorithm to detect the orientation of an end-effector and to visualize the
planned needle pathway. Additionally, it detects a passive marker at the distal
end of the needle to calculate the position of the needle tip for real-time display
during needle insertion. The sequence is evaluated in a phantom experiment, and
both lateral and longitudinal needle insertion accuracies are determined.
Introduction
MR-guided interventions
benefit from real-time visualization of the anatomy1, but the accurate
and rapid detection of the interventional device remains challenging. In
percutaneous needle interventions, image distortions caused by magnetic
susceptibility differences near the needle make it difficult to predict the
exact needle location and insertion depth. Image artifacts are asymmetric to
the needle shaft, and depend on material, surrounding tissue, acquisition
parameters and orientation to the main magnetic field2,3. Thus, automatic alignment of
the imaging plane parallel to the needle and the needle tip visualization
is challenging.
Passive MR tracking
based on a template-matching algorithm allows delineation of the needle pathway
with a cylindrical needle guide without hardware modifications4–8. Here, an image based template-matching
algorithm (phase-only cross correlation, POCC) is used to detect the position
of the passive marker in two tracking images aligned perpendicular to the
symmetry axis of the needle guide. The insertion of a needle through the needle
guide, however, causes image distortion and renders the algorithm
unreliable to detect the needle guide9.
In this work, a modified end-effector is introduced that decouples the needle
pathway from the cylindrical structures used for template-matching. This
approach allows alignment of a plane parallel to the needle and to predict the position of the needle tip with a spherical maker at the handle. The algorithm is implemented in a sequence and the insertion accuracy is evaluated in phantom
experiments.Methods
For
position detection with the sequence an end-effector (Fig.1) was
manufactured with two coaxial cylinders (small/large cylinder: inner
diameter=5/6.5mm, outer diameter=10/13mm) with a displaced channel for needle
guidance (distance=20 mm) using masked stereolithography (Prusa SL1, Prusa Research, Prague, Czech Republic). Additionally, a hollow
sphere (Fig.1, inner diameter=8mm) was 3D-printed and
fixed to the handle of a MR-compatible needle (length=95mm,diameter=16G; Somatex GmbH, Teltow, Germany). The sphere and the coaxial
cylinders were filled with a contrast agent solution (Magnevist®/H2O=1/200, Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany) for MR visualization. The end-effector was then attached to a mechanical assistance system (GantryMate, iSys,
Kitzbühel) that allows needle manipulations from outside the magnet bore
through extension rods10 (Fig.1).
Detection
of the end-effector is performed with a POCC sequence4–8 that acquires two FLASH tracking images of both
cylinders such that they appear as rings with different diameters (Fig.2). In
each tracking image$$$~I$$$, the position of the rings is determined using the POCC algorithm. Here, for each cylinder, a mask $$$~M$$$ is precomputed
with the known physical dimensions and imaging parameters.
The POCC$$POCC(x,y)=\frac{I(x,y)}{\|I(x,y)\|}\ast\frac{M(x,y)}{\|M(x,y)\|}$$is calculated
after Fourier-Transform in k-space representation using matrix multiplication. First,
the POCC is calculated for the small marker and its position is determined with
subpixel precision. Then, this position is nulled in image$$$~I$$$, and the position of the large
ring is determined with an adapted mask image. Using the determined positions, the cylinder plane is calculated,
and a targeting image is acquired coplanar to the needle with a balanced
steady-state free precession (bSSFP) contrast.
In the targeting
slice, a region of interest (ROI) is defined around the estimated position of
the spherical marker (ROIlength=50mm,ROIwidth=12mm,ROIcenter=40mm above the center of both tracking slices). The magnitude values of all
pixels within the ROI are projected to the needle trajectory, and the position
of the spherical marker is determined from the maximum of this distribution.
The known physical distance between the spherical marker and the needle tip
(125mm) is then used to display the real position of the needle tip on the
image (Fig.2). The cycle is repeated using the previously
found ring coordinates and the position of the spherical marker as the center of the search ROI.
The sequence was implemented on a 1.5T system (Magnetom Aera, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). To perform needle insertion
experiments, the assistance system was placed with the end-effector above a
phantom containing 13 fiducial targets. A head coil was used
for signal reception. For each target, the needle trajectory was aligned from a central position in real-time in two orthogonal views (parameter:TR/TE=3.0/1.5ms,BW=1530Hz/px,SLbSSFP=4.5mm,SLFLASH=10mm,FOV=300×300mm,matrix=192x144,TACycle=1.3s). Afterwards, the needle was inserted until the displayed needle tip position reached the target center (Fig.3). After all
targets were punctured, a high-resolution data set (3D-GRE, resolution=0.25mm³) was acquired and the accuracy was evaluated in a reformatted view. Here, each target was approximated by a circle and the
longitudinal accuracy was measured along the needle axis as the distance of the
needle pathway to the nominal center (Fig.4). The lateral targeting accuracy
was determined from the distance of the insertion to the nominal center in a bulls-eye view. Results
All 13 targets could be punctured successfully using the end-effector in combination
with the sequence. For a target diameter of 7.9±0.7mm and an
insertion depth of 27.2±14.4mm, a lateral accuracy of 1.1±0.7mm and a
longitudinal accuracy of 1.2±0.7mm was measured.Discussion & Conclusion
The results show the method can reliably determine the needle tip position without any hardware modifications. The experiment was performed in a controlled setting with a homogeneous phantom. More realistic scenarios have to be studied, taking into account needle deflections. Here, the simultaneous acquisition of two orthogonal slices11 would allow to detect deviations. In conclusion,
estimation of the needle tip position improves the planning of the needle pathway in percutaneous interventions.Acknowledgements
This work was supported in parts by a grant from the
German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi) under the grant
program “Zentrales Innovationsprogramm Mittelstand (ZIM),” grant number
ZF4535603BA9, as part of the IraSME funding “E‐GantryMate.”References
1. Busse,
H., Kahn, T. & Moche, M. Techniques for Interventional MRI Guidance in
Closed-Bore Systems. Top. Magn. Reson. Imaging 27, 9–18 (2018).
2. Lüdeke, K. M., Röschmann, P. &
Tischler, R. Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging. Magn. Reson. Imaging
3, 329–343 (1985).
3. Ladd, M. E. et al. Biopsy needle
susceptibility artifacts. Magn. Reson. Med. 36, 646–651 (1996).
4. de Oliveira, A., Rauschenberg, J.,
Beyersdorff, D., Semmler, W. & Bock, M. Automatic passive tracking of an
endorectal prostate biopsy device using phase-only cross-correlation. Magn.
Reson. Med. 59, 1043–1050 (2008).
5. Krafft, A. J. et al. Passive
marker tracking via phase-only cross correlation (POCC) for MR-guided needle
interventions: Initial in vivo experience. Phys. Med. 29,
607–614 (2013).
6. Zamecnik, P. et al. Automated
Real-time Needle-Guide Tracking for Fast 3-T MR-guided Transrectal Prostate
Biopsy: A Feasibility Study. Radiology 273, 879–886 (2014).
7. Reichert, A. et al. Simultaneous
slice excitation for accelerated passive marker tracking via phase-only cross
correlation (POCC) in MR-guided needle interventions. Magn. Reson. Mater.
Phys. Biol. Med. 31, 781–788 (2018).
8. Reichert, A., Reiss, S., Krafft, A. J.
& Bock, M. Passive needle guide tracking with radial acquisition and
phase-only cross-correlation. Magn. Reson. Med. 85, 1039–1046
(2021).
9. Reichert, A. & Bock, M. MRI Needle
Tracking with Phase-only Cross-Correlation (POCC) in the Presence of
Susceptibility Artifacts. in Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. vol. 29
(2021).
10. Reichert, A., Bock, M., Vogele, M. &
Joachim Krafft, A. GantryMate: A Modular MR-Compatible Assistance System for
MR-Guided Needle Interventions. Tomography 5, 266–273 (2019).
11. Krafft, A. J., Rauschenberg, J., Maier,
F., Jenne, J. W. & Bock, M. Crushed rephased orthogonal slice selection
(CROSS) for simultaneous acquisition of two orthogonal proton resonance
frequency temperature maps: CROSS Temperature Mapping. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging
38, 1510–1520 (2013).