Marrissa J McIntosh1,2, Maksym Sharma1,2, Alexander M Matheson1,2, Harkiran K Kooner1,2, Rachel L Eddy3, Christopher Licskai4, David G McCormack4, Michael Nicholson4, Cory Yamashita4, and Grace Parraga1,2,4,5
1Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON, Canada, 2Robarts Research Institute, London, ON, Canada, 3Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 4Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada, 5School of Biomedical Engineering, Western University, London, ON, Canada
Synopsis
129Xe MRI ventilation images
consist of embedded texture features that may help explain ventilation
heterogeneity. We previously showed that 129Xe MRI ventilation
features predicted response to biologic therapy in asthma and thus, we
postulated that texture features may help explain central and peripheral
airways resistance. We employed machine-learning techniques to identify
specific 129Xe MRI features that were related to airway resistance. Ventilation
texture analysis yielded four unique and two common features that independently
explained central and peripheral airways resistance, respectively. These
promising results suggest that 129Xe ventilation texture analysis
may reveal hidden anatomic-physiologic measurements that lead to ventilation
heterogeneity.
Introduction
The forced-oscillation-technique
(FOT) provides a way to directly measure central and peripheral airway
resistance (R), which in participants with asthma, points to airway
abnormalities that may be responsible for ventilation heterogeneity.1 Hyperpolarized noble gas magnetic-resonance-imaging
(MRI) provides a way to spatially locate and quantify inhaled gas abnormalities
related to airway dysfunction, inflammation and remodeling.2-4 In previous
work, MRI ventilation-defect-percent (VDP)5 was shown to be related to peripheral
airways resistance measured using FOT in patients with asthma and chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease.6,7
VDP is a binary
measurement of ventilation-defects which disregards signal intensity
differences and assumes all ventilated regions contribute equally to global
lung function. These signal intensity differences, or ventilation
heterogeneity, may be quantified as texture features extracted from gray-level
run-length (GLRLM) and co-occurrence matrices (GLCM).8 Hyperpolarized
gas MRI-VDP and MRI texture analysis have been previously used to measure post-bronchodilator
improvements9,10 in airway
function and ventilation and to predict methacholine and biologic therapy responsive
participants with asthma. Unfortunately, the physiological interpretation of texture
features in the context of pulmonary ventilation MRI remains uncharacterized.
Here we hypothesized
that MRI-VDP in combination with shape-based, first-order and higher-order
texture features will independently describe central (R19Hz) and
peripheral (R5-19Hz) airways resistance measured using FOT.
Therefore, the two objectives of this work were to: 1) extract texture features
from 129Xe MRI and use a machine-learning regression approach to
identify features that explain respiratory system resistance and 2) perform
principal-component-analysis (PCA) on significant features to relate these
features to oscillometric biomechanics. Methods
Participants and Data Acquisition:
We retrospectively
analyzed 71 participants with eosinophilic-asthma (n=24) or post-acute COVID-19
syndrome (PACS) (n=47) and eight healthy volunteers. Data were randomly split
into training (n=60) and testing (n=19) sets. Anatomic 1H and 129Xe static ventilation MRI were acquired using a 3.0
Tesla scanner as previously described.11 Anatomic 1H MRI was acquired using a fast-spoiled
gradient-recalled-echo sequence (partial-echo acquisition;
total acquisition time=8s; repetition-time msec/echo time msec=4.7/1.2;
flip-angle=30°; field-of-view=40×40cm2; bandwidth=24.4kHz; 128×80
matrix, zero-padded to 128×128; partial-echo percent=62.5%; 15-17×15mm slices).
129Xe MRI was acquired using a three-dimensional fast-spoiled
gradient-recalled echo sequence (total acquisition time=14s; repetition-time
msec/echo time msec=6.7/1.5; variable flip-angle; field-of-view=40×40cm2;
bandwidth=15.63kHz; 128×128 matrix; 14×15mm slices). Supine participants were
coached to inhale a 1.0L bag (400mL 129Xe + 600mL 4He for
129Xe MRI; 1.0L N2 for 1H MRI) from the bottom
of a tidal breath with acquisition under breath-hold conditions. Participants
performed spirometry12 according to
American Thoracic Society guidelines and FOT13 according to European Respiratory Society guidelines using
a tremoFlo C-100 Airwave Oscillometry System to measure R between 5 and 37 Hz.
Image Processing and Statistics:
Quantitative MRI
analysis was performed using a semi-automated segmentation algorithm, as
previously described14 using Matlab 2021b. Texture features were extracted from the 3D-application
of GLRLM and GLCM using the PyRadiomics platform.15 Feature
selection was performed using f-test statistics
to independently rank and identify extracted texture features, including
MRI-VDP, which significantly contributed to each
machine-learning model’s performance. Two machine-learning models were
developed to explain R19Hz and R5-19Hz using Matlab
2021b. Five-fold cross-validation was implemented to prevent over-fitting.
Model performance was evaluated using root-mean-square-error (RMSE). Selected
features from both models underwent PCA to describe the physiology responsible
for MRI ventilation texture features.Results
Table 1
provides demographic characteristics for all 79 participants. Figure 1 provides
129Xe MRI center slice ventilation images for representative
participants with normal or abnormal central or peripheral airways resistance.16
As shown in
Figure 2, we identified six features per model (four unique features per model,
two common features) that were used to explain R19Hz and R5-19Hz;
VDP was not identified as a significant feature (rank: R19Hz-48/72,
R5-19Hz-65/72) in either model. Table 3 shows the five highest
performing models for R19Hz and R5-19Hz. Highest
performance for R19Hz and R5-19Hz was achieved using
coarse regression trees (RMSE=0.97) and medium regression trees (RMSE=0.71),
respectively.
The
ten selected features for both models underwent PCA, which revealed that seven
features described ventilation heterogeneity (Shape: Maximum 2D Diameter Slice;
First Order: Robust Mean Absolute Deviation; GLCM: Difference Average,
Difference Entropy, Inverse Variance, Joint Energy; GLRLM: Gray-Level
Non-Uniformity), two features described whole-lung ventilation (First Order:
Root Mean Squared, Interquartile Range) and one feature described the shape of
the ventilation image (Shape: Flatness).Discussion
We developed two machine-learning regression
models to explain oscillometry-measured central and peripheral airways
resistances using 129Xe MRI texture features. Central and peripheral
airway models each contained four unique and two common features. Both common
features were revealed through PCA to describe ventilation heterogeneity, while
the central airway feature First Order Root Mean Squared describes highly
ventilated pixels while the peripheral airway feature First Order Interquartile
Range describes the number of normally ventilated pixels. This suggests that
highly ventilated pixels are related to the central airways while the number of
normally ventilated pixels are related to the peripheral airways. Conclusion
Hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI texture
features that explained central and peripheral airways resistance in patients
with eosinophilic-asthma and PACS. We showed for the first time that central
and peripheral airway resistance measured using FOT may be explained using
hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI texture features. These promising results
suggest that 129Xe ventilation texture analysis may reveal hidden
anatomic-physiologic measurements that lead to ventilation heterogeneity.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1 Kaczka, D. W. et al. JAP (2011).
2 Svenningsen, S. et al. AJRCCM (2018).
3 Eddy, R. L. et al. AJRCCM (2020).
4 Costella, S. et al. Respirology
(2012).
5 Kirby, M. et al. Proc. SPIE (2010).
6 Young, H. M. et al. JAP (2018).
7 Eddy, R. L. et al. PhysiolRep (2019).
8 Haralick, R. M. et al. IEETSystManCyb (1973).
9 Zha, N.
et al. AcadRadiol (2016).
10 Kirby, M.
et al. Radiology (2011).
11 Svenningsen, S. et al. JMRI (2013).
12 Miller, M. R. et al. ERJ (2005).
13 King, G. G. et al. ERJ (2020).
14 Kirby, M.
et al. AcadRadiol (2012).
15 van Griethuysen, J. J. M. et al. CancerRes (2017).
16 Oostveen, E. et al. ERJ (2013).