Kilian A. Dietrich1,2,3, Sebastian Klüter2,4,5, Jürgen Debus1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Fabian Dinkel9, Gernot Echner9, Mark E. Ladd1,3,8, and Tanja Platt1,2
1Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany, 3Faculty of Physics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany, 4National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany, 5Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany, 6National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany, 7German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany, 8Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany, 9German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
Synopsis
An RF body coil compatible with
particle therapy was built for a clinical MR scanner at 1.5T with a
rotatable patient capsule. The attenuation of 1H+ and 12C6+ ions due
to inelastic scattering was calculated for different materials to
estimate the detrimental effects of the RF coil on the particle beam.
The imaging capabilities could be demonstrated with phantom
measurements at different flip angles, and corresponding transmit and
receive characteristics were analyzed and compared to electromagnetic
field simulations for both a horizontal and a tilted position of a
phantom.
Introduction
As recent studies indicate,
MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) harbors great potential as an
alternative to conventional CT-guided radiotherapy1. Alongside
better soft tissue contrast, NMR
provides an imaging method without
ionizing
radiation. Imaging between irradiation fractions
or real-time gating could permit modifications to the treatment plan
and lead
to adaptive radiotherapy. This concept can also
be applied to particle therapy, which has the potential to further
reduce the dose exposure to
the patient2. Therefore a hybrid device
comprising a treatment table in an MR scanner with access of the ion
beam to the patient would be favorable. However, this configuration
puts strict conditions on the MR system and its components. The ion
beam must not be affected by the RF coil, since scattering or unknown
attenuation may impair the treatment. Ideally, the patient table
provides access from several angles to be more flexible in the
treatment planning. Even for static ion beams, this could be realized
with a rotatable patient capsule. Moreover, uniform and homogeneous
RF transmit field characteristics over a large FOV are necessary for
reliable tissue classification. In this work, an RF body coil with
minimal water equivalent thickness (WET) was designed and constructed
for a clinical MR scanner at 1.5T.Methods
Coil: A single channel Tx/Rx
16-leg high-pass birdcage configuration3,4 with total length of
520mm was chosen to achieve high RF field homogeneity. The coil is
attached to the inner surface of an acrylic glass cylinder with an
inner diameter of 530mm and consists of copper with a thickness of
35µm covered between two sheets of polyimide and multiple layers of
acrylic glue. While the supporting components of the coil and the
capsule can be built homogeneously and corrected for in the treatment
plan, sharp edges near the conductor or at electronic components pose
a bigger obstacle. For that reason, all conductors and other
electronic devices (quadrature
hybrid, Tx/Rx switch, cables,..) are located at the end rings. The
WET of the conductor was calculated for protons and 12C6+ ions in the
clinical energy range of (48-221)MeV and (88-430)MeV/u respectively
via the Bethe-Bloch formula5 to estimate the beam interaction with
the coil.
MR scanner: All measurements were
performed on a 1.5T whole-body MR system (Sola, Siemens Healthcare,
Erlangen, Germany). B1+ mapping was performed using the double-angle
method6 with the following sequence parameters: 2
acquisitions with GRE sequence: TE=10ms, TR=10s, in-plane
resolution=(3.75mm)², slice thickness=5mm, RF spoiling; 1st pulse
voltage=150V; 2nd pulse voltage=300V. For comparison, an MR image was
acquired with a pulse voltage of 200V with equal
parameters except for a resolution of (3.2mm)²×(5mm). Additionally,
the coil performance was examined with the ellipsoidal phantom
rotated 30° within the capsule as detuning
of the body coil
could deteriorate its imaging capabilities.
Phantom: A phantom of size
500×350×200mm3 is filled with a mixture of water, sodium chloride
and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) to imitate the mean permittivity
(εr=47) and mean conductivity (σ=0.42$$$\frac{S}{m}$$$) of the human torso at
64MHz; these values were extracted from a human voxel phantom
(Gustav) in simulation.
Simulation: Crucial
parts of the setup (see Fig. 1) were implemented in a simplified
model to perform electromagnetic field simulations in CST Studio
Suite 20207 from 0 to 150MHz. Insulating materials were specified
as acrylic glass (εr=2.8, tan(ẟ)=0.02
(1MHz)).The mesh for the finite element calculation covers the
structure with approximately 20 million
cells, including an enhanced resolution of 2mm in the vicinity of the
RF coil.
Imaging: The relationship between
MR signal and relative RF field distributions is as follows:
$$$S(\vec{x})\sim sin(α(\vec{x}))×B_{1,~rel}^{-}(\vec{x})$$$ with flip angle $$$α(\vec{x})\sim B_{1,~rel}^{+}(\vec{x})$$$.
Given the transmit field and the
MR signal for a specific flip angle, the receive field distribution
(see Fig. 2) or vice versa the MR signal was calculated (see Fig.
3).Results
For both protons and 12C6+ ions,
the WET of the conductor in the RF coil is less than 215µm in the
applied energy range and thus is deemed negligible for treatment
planning.
In Fig. 2 the transmit and
receive fields are illustrated for a transversal slice of the phantom
in the magnet center. Good
field homogeneity was achieved for 0° and 30° rotation of the
phantom with slight
field asymmetries, especially at the edges of the phantom. However,
the RF fields from measurement and simulation show similar
distributions. The coefficient of variation (COV) values in Fig. 4
quantitatively confirm the uniformity of the B1+ and B1- fields and
the agreement between measurement and simulation. Fig. 3 shows MR
images of the homogeneous phantom and the similarity between directly
measured, scaled, and purely simulated data.Discussion & Conclusion
The built RF coil provides a
concept for MRgRT with particles while maintaining good imaging
characteristics at 64MHz with little asymmetries comparable to those reported in
literature8,9. As the coil is capable of both transmitting and
receiving MR signals, additional receive coils can be omitted,
facilitating particle therapy by avoiding the effect of additional
hardware on the ion beam. To achieve higher flexibility in therapy, a
large range of rotation angles would be beneficial. Therefore,
further investigation of the angular dependence of the RF field
homogeneity will be performed in future experiments with the
presented setup.Acknowledgements
This
work received financial support from the German Federal Ministry of
Education and Research (BMBF, ARTEMIS project WP8, funding reference
13GW0436B)References
1Pollard J. M. et al.,
"The future of image-guided radiotherapy will be MR guided",
The British Institute of Radiology (2017)
2Hoffmann A., et al.,
"MR-guided proton therapy: a review and a preview",
Radiation Oncology 15 (2020); 1-13
3Tropp J., "The
theory of the bird-cage resonator", Journal of Magnetic
Resonance (1989); 82:51-62
4Hayes C. E. et al.,
"An efficient, highly homogeneous radiofrequency coil for
whole-body NMR imaging at 1.5T", Journal of Magnetic Resonance
(1985); 63:622-628
5Bloch, F., "Zur
Bremsung rasch bewegter Teilchen beim Durchgang durch die Materie",
Annalen der Physik (1933); 16,
285.
6Insko
E. K., Bolinger L., "Mapping of the radiofrequency field.",
Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1993); 103:82-85.
7"CST Studio
Suite 2020", Dassault Systèmes, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France
8Vaidya M. V. et al.,
"Dependence of B1+ and B1- field patterns of surface coils on
the electrical properties of the sample and the MR operating
frequency", Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B (2016);
46:25-40
9Cloos M. A. et al.,
"Multiparametric imaging with heterogeneous radiofrequency
fields", Nature Communications (2016); 7:12445