Yi Wang1, Xinqi Wang2, Lu Wang2, Lizhi Xie3, Qinhe Zhang4, and Ailian Liu4
1Department of Radiology, Dalian Friendship Hospital, Dalian, China, 2School of Medical Imaging, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China, 3GE Healthcare, MR Research China, Beijing, China, 4Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
Synopsis
This work aimed for diffusion
tensor imaging (DTI) quantitative parameter texture features based strategy to identify solid pseudopapillary
neoplasm(SPN)and pancreatic neuroendocrine
tumors(PNET),which may represent a
diagnostic challenge due to many overlapping MRI features. The results showed
that Large Area Emphasis (AUC: 0.737, sensitivity: 64.7%, specificity: 80%on
FA signal intensity) was the optimal strategy to identify SPN and PNET.
Purpose
To evaluate the value of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) quantitative parameter texture features in differentiating solid pseudopapillary neoplasm(SPN) from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET).Introduction
SPN
and PNET are all the rare tumor of pancrea, SPN have a low malignant potential
with an excellent prognosis following complete resection and metastases are
uncommon for SPN [1–3], while PNET have malignant behavior and worse
prognosis compared to SPN. Because the clinical
management and patient prognosis significantly differ between these two major
pancreatic lesions, accurate and timely imaging diagnosis is essential[4] . Therefore, differentiating
PNET from SPN based on imaging manifestation may be challenging when the
atypical characteristics are found. DTI is an imaging modality that detects the
microstructural and pathological changes of organisms according to the
diffusive characteristics of water molecules in the tissues, while texture
features is a new image analysis method which has been used for malignant tumor
grade or prognosis evaluations. We hypothesize that it’s feasible to identify
SPN and PNET by DTI texture features based on strategy.Materials and Methods
The study
retrospectively enrolled 32 patients who were pathologically or follow-up
imaging confirmed as SPN(15 case) or PNET(17 case), respectively. All patients
have undergone preoperative MR examinations, including routine scanning (T1WI, T2WI) and additional DTI (b value=0, 600 (s/mm2), in
6 directions). ADC and FA maps were derived using FunctionTool
software on GE AW4.6 workstation, and they were analyzed by Omni-Kinetics
software (GE Healthcare). The radiologist reviewed the MRI images and manually
outlined the region of interests (ROIs) at each slice of the lesion on ADC and
FA signal intensity maps, then texture features were generated automatically
after 3D ROIs covering the whole tumor (Figure 1, Figure 2). Texture
parameters, such as Energy,
Entropy, Kurtosis, Maximum, Mean, Median, Minimum, Skewness, Uniformity,
Cluster Prominence, Cluster Shade, Correlation, Long Run Emphasis, Run Length
Non-uniformity Normalized, Short Run Emphasis, Large Area Emphasisand Small
Area Emphasis were obtained. Data analysis were performed using SPSS 26.0 statistical software. Mann-Whitney
U test was used for texture features, diagnostic performance was evaluated
by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.Results
There
was a significant difference in Energy of ADC signal
intensity between the SPN and PNET groups. Moreover, a significant difference
was observed in Maximum, Long Run Emphasis, Run Length Non-uniformity
Normalized(RLNUN), Short Run Emphasis(SRE), Large Area Emphasis, Small Area
Emphasis(SAM) of FA signal
intensity between the two groups (P<0.05, Table 1). The
remaining parameters were not statistically different. Results
indicated that Large Area Emphasis (AUC: 0.737, sensitivity: 64.7%, specificity: 80% on FA signal intensity) was the optimal strategy to identify SPN and PNET (Table 2, Figure 3).Discussion
The Energy of ADC in SPN group
was higher compared to PENT group. The Maximum, Long Run Emphasis, Large
Area Emphasis of FA in SPN group was higher compared to PENT group. The Run Length Non-uniformity Normalized,Short Run Emphasis, Small Area Emphasis of FA in
SPN group was lower compared to PENT group. Texture features on FA is more valuable than those on ADC. To our best knowledge, this
is the first study of DTI based texture strategy to identify SPN and PENT and further study will be
performed to verify its utility.Conclusion
This study proposed a DTI based texture strategy to
preoperatively identify SPN and PNET, it may provide a
more promising method for tumor differentiation in clinic and facilitate clinical management.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1].Romics L, Jr.,
Oláh A, Belágyi T, Hajdú N, Gyurus P, Ruszinkó V. Solid pseudopapillary
neoplasm of the pancreas–proposed algorithms for diagnosis and surgical
treatment. Langenbecks Arch Surg. (2010) 395:
747–55.
[2].Wang WB, Zhang
TP, Sun MQ, Peng Z, Chen G, Zhao Y. Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the
pancreas with liver metastasis: clinical features and management. Eur J Surg Oncol. (2014) 40:1572–7.
[3].Law JK, Ahmed A, Singh VK, Akshintala VS, Olson MT, Raman SP,
et al. A systematic review of solid-pseudopapillary neoplasms: are these
rare lesions? Pancreas. (2014) 43:331–7.
[4].Reidy-Lagunes D, Thornton R. Pancreatic
neuroendocrine and carcinoid tumors: what’s new, what’s old, and what’s
different? Curr Oncol Rep. (2012) 14:249–56.