Yan Xie1, Yan Zhang1, Weiyin Vivian Liu2, and Wenzhen Zhu1
1Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China, 2GE Healthcare, MR Research China, Beijing, China
Synopsis
The purpose of
this study was to assess the differences in the patterns of NMOSD and
MS-related optic nerve damage by DTI. In this study, the intraorbital optic
nerve was divided anatomically in three equal parts. We found that
NMOSD-related optic neuritis exhibited extensive optic nerve damage,
particularly in the posterior segment of the optic nerve, whereas MS-related
optic neuritis tended to be more anterior-middle optic nerve damage. In addition, the combination of FA with
conventional MRI showed better differential diagnostic efficacy for NMOSD and
MS-related optic neuritis.
Introduction
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) and multiple sclerosis (MS) are both common demyelinating diseases of central nervous system and share similar symptoms of optic neuritis[1]. But treatment strategies have suggested to be utilized in clinics. MS treatment regimens may worsen NMOSD, so it is crucial to differentiate between the two in clinical practice[2; 3]. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) can quantitatively evaluate the integrity of white matter fiber bundles given water movement in random distribution. In this study, factional anisotropy (FA) was computed to assess the optic nerve impairment in NMOSD and MS and investigate the feasibility of FA to differentiate between the two diseases.Materials and methods
31 patients with NMOSD and 25 patients with MS were recruited. NMOSD
and MS patients were divided into vision-impaired (VI) subgroup and
normal-appearing (NA) subgroup according to their visual status, respectively. 17
age- and gender-matched healthy controls (HC) were
included in the study. All subjects underwent MR imaging on a 3T MR scanner
(Discovery MR750, GE Medical
Systems) with a 32-channel head coil. The sagittal CUBE T2WI of head was obtained with the following parameters: TR/TE = 2500/84 ms, NEX = 1, matrix
=256×256, slice thickness = 1 mm, slice spacing = 1 mm, FOV = 256×256 mm2, and acquisition time was 3 minutes
31 s. The axial optic nerve DTI was obtained parallel to the bilateral
optic nerve by using spin-echo echo-planar imaging sequence with 64 non-collinear spatial directions
and the scanning range was from the inferior to superior orbital rim. For DTI
acquisitions, TR/TE = 2000/67 ms, NEX = 1, matrix =
128×128, slice thickness = 2 mm, slice spacing = 0 mm, 16 slices, FOV = 256×256
mm2, b = 0, 1000 s/mm2, and acquisition time was 2
minutes 12 s. The Fractional anisotropy (FA) maps were generated on GE Advantage workstation
(version 4.5) from raw DTI data. FA values
were measured in the anterior, middle, and posterior parts of each intraorbital
optic nerve segment using ITK-SNAP software (version 3.8.0). The signal
intensity ratio (SIR) on T2WI was defined as the optic nerve signal intensity
divided by the brain white matter signal intensity. All statistical analyses were performed by using SPSS (Version 26.0.0, IBM)
and MedCalc (Version 15.8, MedCalc Software). P < 0.05 was
considered statistically significant.Results
FA values in VI NMOSD significantly decreased in the
whole optic nerve than those in HC, especially the posterior segment of the
optic nerve (P<0.001) (Fig.1). FA values
measured in the anterior
and middle segments of optic nerve in VI MS were significantly decreased compared
to HC (P<0.05). Between NMOSD and MS, FA values in the posterior segment of
the optic nerve showed significant differences (VI NMOSD
vs VI MS P<0.001; NA NMOSD vs NA MS, P=0.041, respectively) (Fig. 2).
The signal intensity ratio (SIR) in the posterior segment of optic
nerve significantly increased in VI NMOSD compared to VI MS (P=0.002). The combination of SIR and FA for distinguishing VI NMOSD
from VI MS resulted in better sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative
predictive values of 86.49 %, 80.00 %, 88.9 % and 76.2 %, respectively (Fig. 3).Discussion
Our study found
that FA values, particularly measured in the posterior segment of the optic
nerve, can help to distinguish the different patterns of optic nerve damage
between NMOSD and MS. VI NMOSD appeared a wide range of
optic nerve impairment, from the anterior to the posterior segment of the optic
nerve, but the posterior segment of the optic nerve is more commonly involved[4].
The impairment of the optic
nerve in MS was relatively involved in short segment [5]. FA values significantly
decreased in the anterior and middle segments of the optic nerve in VI MS
patients. We speculated
that NMOSD caused more severe optic nerve damage than MS, with more pronounced
changes in optic nerve fiber structure and more aggressive demyelination, leading
to a widespread decrease in FA. These
findings can be explained by the results of previous studies that Papadopoulos et al [6] found the NMOSD-related
optic neuritis differs from the acute demyelination of MS-related optic
neuritis in that the inflammatory infiltration and necrosis produced by AQP4
antibodies resulted in more severe axonal damage.
Abnormal T2 signal of the optic nerve is one of the current diagnostic criteria
for optic neuritis; however, image quality and sensitivity of results were easily
affected by environment, equipment, technique, patient factors such as layer
thickness and eye movement. FA was sensitive in detecting abnormalities in
optic nerve integrity caused by optic nerve damage. The
combination of FA and SIR on T2WI allowed for more sensitive and accurate diagnosis
of the severity and anatomical site of optic nerve damage, facilitating the differentiation
between NMOSD and MS.Conclusion
NMOSD and MS-related optic nerve impairment cause to decreased FA values in different segments of the optic nerve. DTI may be a simple and effective imaging tool to assess NMOSD and MS-related optic nerve impairment.Acknowledgements
Funding: This
project was supported by the National Natural Science Funds of China (Grants
No.81730049). References
1. Liu Y, Dong D, Zhang L et al (2019)
Radiomics in multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Eur
Radiol 29:4670-4677
2. Palace J,
Leite MI, Nairne A, Vincent A (2010) Interferon Beta treatment in neuromyelitis
optica: increase in relapses and aquaporin 4 antibody titers. Arch Neurol
67:1016-1017
3. Min JH, Kim
BJ, Lee KH (2012) Development of extensive brain lesions following fingolimod
(FTY720) treatment in a patient with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.
Mult Scler 18:113-115
4. Chen Z, Lou
X, Liu M et al (2015) Assessment of Optic Nerve Impairment in Patients with
Neuromyelitis Optica by MR Diffusion Tensor Imaging. PLoS One 10:e0126574
5. Dutra BG, da
Rocha AJ, Nunes RH, Maia ACMJ (2018) Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders:
Spectrum of MR Imaging Findings and Their Differential Diagnosis. Radiographics
38:169-193
6. Papadopoulos
MC, Verkman AS (2012) Aquaporin 4 and neuromyelitis optica. The Lancet
Neurology 11:535-544