Paulien H.M. Voorter1,2, Jacobus F.A. Jansen1,2,3, Merel M. van der Thiel1,2, Julie Staals4,5, Robert-Jan van Oostenbrugge2,4,5, Maud van Dinther4,5, Walter H. Backes1,2,5, and Gerhard S. Drenthen1,2
1Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands, 2School for Mental Health & Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands, 3Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 4Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands, 5School for Cardiovascular Disease, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
Synopsis
Acquisition
of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) images with diffusion sensitization in
at least six directions (IVIM tensor imaging) provides the unique opportunity to
non-invasively measure the anisotropy of both the parenchymal and microvascular
diffusivity (D and D*). We demonstrate the feasibility of whole-brain IVIM
tensor analysis by utilizing a physics-informed neural network fitting approach
to achieve more accurate assessment of D, D*, and the corresponding
tensors. The fractional anisotropy of D*
(FA(D*)) was explored for different
brain tissue regions, which revealed lower FA(D*) in cortical gray matter and higher FA(D*) in deep gray matter compared to white matter.
Introduction
Intravoxel
incoherent motion (IVIM) MRI is a diffusion-weighted technique that is
sensitive to diffusion of water in the parenchyma (D), as well as flow-mediated diffusivity of microvascular blood (D*).1 This technique is
relevant for research on pathologies in which both the microstructural
integrity and microvasculature are altered, e.g. cerebral small vessel disease
(cSVD).2 To estimate the microvascular component,
the IVIM signal attenuation is sampled across a range of diffusion sensitizing
b-values, and can be decomposed (for a given direction) into a parenchymal and a
microvascular component by fitting a bi-exponential model.1 When the
diffusion sensitization is applied in at least six directions, the anisotropy of
diffusing water molecules can be characterized, which is a well-established
method (DTI; diffusion tensor imaging) to measure the direction of large axon
bundles using the D-tensor.3
The
combination of IVIM and DTI has the potential to estimate the anisotropy of
microvascular pseudo-diffusion, which could reveal unique information on the preferred
orientation of the functional microvascular architecture. However, previous
studies that employed IVIM tensor imaging, reported that estimating the D*-tensor was challenging since the fast
signal decay part pertaining to D* is small and strongly suffers from image
noise.4,5 Fitting the bi-exponential IVIM model using a recently developed
physics-informed neural network (PI-NN), was shown to provide a more robust
estimation of D* compared to
conventional fitting methods6, and might yield a more accurate
estimation of the D*-tensor. Therefore,
we utilize this state-of-the-art fitting method to explore the feasibility of
whole-brain IVIM tensor imaging and simultaneously examine the potential
anisotropic behaviour of D* over
different brain tissue regions. Methods
MRI acquisition: Eleven participants (seven patients
with vascular cognitive impairment due to cSVD and four cognitively normal
subjects) underwent whole-brain imaging (3T MRI, Philips, Achieva TX). IVIM tensor
imaging was acquired with fourteen non-zero diffusion sensitive b-values in six
noncollinear gradient directions, and included cerebrospinal fluid suppression (single-shot
spin-echo echo-planar-imaging (EPI), 2.4 mm cubic voxel size, b-values: 0,10,20,30,40,50,60,100,200,300,400,500,600,800,1000
s/mm2). An additional b=0-image with reversed phase-encoding
direction was acquired for distortion correction. Furthermore, T2-weighted
FLAIR and T1-weighted images were acquired for segmentation of
different brain regions of interest (ROIs).
Image analysis: The IVIM images were corrected for
geometric EPI distortions (topup, FSL) and head displacements (ExploreDTI).
Cortical gray matter (cGM), deep gray matter (dGM) and white matter (WM) were
automatically segmented (Freesurfer), whereas white matter hyperintensities (WMH)
were manually delineated. The bi-exponential IVIM model was fitted to the
signal decay curves in a voxel-wise manner by means of a PI-NN.6
Briefly, the PI-NN uses a fully-connected 2-layer neural network for each IVIM
parameter and it learns the physics of the IVIM model due to the implementation
of the IVIM signal decay formula in the loss-function.6
Tensor calculation: The IVIM metrics were calculated
for each of the six gradient directions. Subsequently, the six independent tensor
elements were calculated by the matrix product of the pseudo-inversed B-matrix
and the estimated diffusivities (D
and D*).5 Next, the tensor
was quantified by computing the eigenvalues. From these eigenvalues, the fractional
anisotropy (FA) was calculated for both D
and D*.7 Median FA values
were obtained in the cGM, dGM, normal-appearing WM (NAWM) and WMH.
Statistical analysis: Within-subjects ANOVA with post-hoc
analyses and Bonferroni corrections were conducted to identify significant differences
across the ROIs for FA(D*) and FA(D). Results
Figure 1
visualizes the mean D- and D*-maps and Figure 2 shows FA(D)- and FA(D*)-maps of a patient
with vascular cognitive impairment. The large fiber bundles are clearly enhanced
on the FA(D)-map, and the FA(D*)-map follows the same organization as FA(D), although with lower values.
Figure 3 plots
the median FA(D*) and FA(D) for cGM, dGM, NAWM and WMH. Two
participants had a low WMH load (<3.0 mL), hence the FAs in WMH of these
participants were excluded from analysis.
The within-subjects ANOVA revealed
significant differences of FA(D*)
between the tissue types (F=36.38, p<.001).
Post-hoc analysis showed that the FA(D*)
of cGM was lower compared to dGM (p<.001), NAWM (p=.001) and
WMH (p=.001), and that the FA(D*)
of dGM was higher compared to NAWM (p=.001) and WMH (p=.019). FA(D) was also found to be different
across the tissue types (F=71.85,
p<.001). The
post-hoc test showed lower FA(D) in
WMH compared to cGM (p=.027), dGM (p<.001) and NAWM (p<.001), and lower FA(D) in cGM compared to dGM and NAWM (both p<.001). Discussion & Conclusion
The current
study demonstrated the feasibility of whole-brain IVIM tensor imaging in
combination with a PI-NN for characterising the orientation of the microcirculatory
network. The in vivo results were in line with a prior post-mortem human histology
study, where the FA of microvessels was found to be lower in the cGM compared
to the WM and dGM.8 Furthermore, the mean diffusivity maps (D and D*)
were consistent with biological expectations2,11, and our measured FA(D)
of the ROIs was in agreement with previous DTI studies.9,10 Compared to conventional DTI, IVIM tensor
imaging might provide more accurate estimation of the parenchymal diffusion, as
it adjusts for additional phase incoherence effects due to the microcirculatory
anisotropy. This study opens up new possibilities to gain insight in the preferred
orientation of functional microvascular networks and its alteration, for
instance due to pathology.Acknowledgements
This
work has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and
innovation programme ‘CRUCIAL’ under grant number 848109. References
1. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Grenier P, Cabanis E,
Laval-Jeantet M. MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to
diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology. 1986;161(2):401-7.
2. Wong SM, Zhang CE, van Bussel FC, Staals J,
Jeukens CR, Hofman PA, et al. Simultaneous
investigation of microvasculature and parenchyma in cerebral small vessel
disease using intravoxel incoherent motion imaging. NeuroImage: Clinical.
2017;14:216-21.
3. Alexander AL, Lee JE, Lazar M, Field AS. Diffusion tensor imaging
of the brain. Neurotherapeutics. 2007;4(3):316-29.
4. Zhang XS, Sang XQ, Kuai ZX, Zhang HX, Lou J, Lu Q, et al.
Investigation of intravoxel incoherent motion tensor imaging for the
characterization of the in vivo human heart. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
2021;85(3):1414-26.
5. Finkenstaedt T, Klarhoefer M, Eberhardt C, Becker AS, Andreisek
G, Boss A, et al. The IVIM signal in the healthy cerebral gray matter: a play
of spherical and non-spherical components. Neuroimage. 2017;152:340-7.
6. Kaandorp MP, Barbieri S, Klaassen R, van
Laarhoven HW, Crezee H, While PT, et al. Improved
unsupervised physics‐informed deep learning for intravoxel incoherent motion
modeling and evaluation in pancreatic cancer patients. Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine. 2021;86(4):2250-65.
7. Basser PJ, Pierpaoli C. Microstructural and physiological
features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. J Magn
Reson B. 1996;111(3):209-19.
8. Kochová P, Cimrman R, Janáček J, Witter K, Tonar Z. How to asses,
visualize and compare the anisotropy of linear structures reconstructed from
optical sections—A study based on histopathological quantification of human
brain microvessels. Journal of theoretical biology. 2011;286:67-78.
9. Croall ID, Lohner V, Moynihan B, Khan U, Hassan A, O’Brien JT, et
al. Using DTI to assess white matter microstructure in cerebral small vessel
disease (SVD) in multicentre studies. Clinical science. 2017;131(12):1361-73.
10. Fox R, Sakaie K, Lee J-C, Debbins J, Liu Y, Arnold D, et al. A
validation study of multicenter diffusion tensor imaging: reliability of
fractional anisotropy and diffusivity values. American Journal of
Neuroradiology. 2012;33(4):695-700.
11. Stewart CR, Stringer MS, Shi Y, Thrippleton MJ, Wardlaw JM.
Associations between white matter hyperintensity burden, cerebral blood flow
and transit time in small vessel disease: an updated meta-analysis. Frontiers
in neurology. 2021;12:621.